民主制下少数人权利的保护

发布时间：2018-04-29 14:18

本文选题：民主 + 少数人　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文从学界对于少数人概念的争论入手,阐述了民主制下少数人权利保护的必要性、可行性。站在宪法的高度,以民主制为切入点,对少数人的保护予以尝试和初探。少数人作为单个人,应该享有最基本的人权,抛开民主制,少数人就是社会生活中的普通人,当然应该享有宪法和法律所赋予给公民的权利,并且履行公民的义务。民主制的建立,能够相对公平、高效的解决争端、处理事务,但是从法理的角度上看,没有人可以没有限制的剥夺少数人的基本人权,尽管民主为其披上了貌似合法的外衣,也属于“多数人的暴政”,也是近代民主制的弊病。本文进一步阐述了对于少数人的特别保护的必要性,这种形式上的不平等是为了追求实质上的平等。以史为鉴,对于少数人的这些保护是必要的,给予少数人的保护,没有违背平等,也没有新一轮的歧视,而正式现代民主制的精髓体现,也是实现实质的平等的需要。
[Abstract]:Starting with the debate on the concept of minority in academic circles, this paper expounds the necessity and feasibility of minority rights protection under democratic system. Standing at the height of the Constitution and taking democracy as the breakthrough point, the protection of minorities is tried and explored. Minorities, as individuals, should enjoy the most basic human rights. Apart from democracy, minorities are ordinary people in social life. Of course, they should enjoy the rights granted to citizens by the Constitution and the law, and fulfil their duties as citizens. The establishment of democracy can be relatively fair and efficient in resolving disputes and handling affairs. But from a legal point of view, no one can deprive minorities of their basic human rights without limits, even though democracy has put on a seemingly legitimate cloak for them. It also belongs to the tyranny of the majority and is also the malady of modern democracy. This paper further expounds the necessity of special protection for minorities, the formal inequality for the pursuit of substantive equality. Taking history as a mirror, these protections for minorities are necessary. The protection of minorities is not contrary to equality and there is no new round of discrimination. The essence of formal modern democracy is also the need to realize substantive equality.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D998.2

【相似文献】