我国农村土地所有权制度的历史变迁及改革分析

发布时间：2018-06-01 19:24

本文选题：土地 + 所有权　；参考：《西南财经大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：土地是人类生存与发展的基础,是社会财富的源泉。土地所有权制度是对土地权益的法制化设定,其核心是解决土地资源的高效率配置,以实现土地产出的社会效益最大化,同时兼顾土地收益在社会范围内的公平分配问题。当前,我国面临着土地资源短缺且利用效率不高、不同性质土地收益差距较大且利益分配不均的矛盾,进而引发了对现行土地所有权制度合理性的思考,以及对如何实现高效率配置土地资源、公平分配土地收益的研究。本文梳理了我国自夏、商、周时期以来的土地制度,对历史上不同时期土地制度的建立、特征和变更进行了简单的介绍,为解决当前土地问题提供了宝贵的历史借鉴。同时,在对我国农村土地所有权制度的相关理论研究与实践做了较为全面的回顾与梳理后,本文还详细介绍了我国当前农村土地集体所有制的历史演变及其面临的困境,对其做出了较为客观的评价。最后,笔者对当前存在的三种改革方向(农村土地所有制私有化改革、国有化改革、集体土地所有制的自我完善)进行了详尽的对比,主要从各种改革方向的支持原因和面临困境这两个方面来分析研究,得出笔者对我国现行农村土地集体所有制国有化改革的支持,并提出了对国有化改革的一些具体政策与建议：第一,重新构建土地所有权结构,明确土地资源开发利用中的各种权益以及相应的义务；第二,加快健全民主与法制建设,切实保障土地资源各项权益主体的合法利益。
[Abstract]:Land is the foundation of human existence and development and the source of social wealth. Land ownership system is a legal system of land rights and interests, the core of which is to solve the problem of efficient allocation of land resources in order to maximize the social benefits of land output and at the same time to give consideration to the fair distribution of land income in the social scope. At present, our country is faced with the contradiction of land resources shortage and low utilization efficiency, the difference of land income of different nature and the uneven distribution of benefits, which leads to the consideration of the rationality of the current land ownership system. And how to achieve efficient allocation of land resources, equitable distribution of land income research. This article combs the land system of our country since the summer, the Shang, the Zhou period, has carried on the simple introduction to the establishment, the characteristic and the change of the land system in different periods in the history, has provided the valuable historical reference for solving the present land question. At the same time, after reviewing and combing the theory and practice of rural land ownership system in China, this paper also introduces the historical evolution of collective ownership of rural land in China and the difficulties it faces. A more objective evaluation is made. Finally, the author makes a detailed comparison of the three existing reform directions (privatization reform of rural land ownership, nationalization reform, self-improvement of collective land ownership). Mainly from various reform direction support reason and the difficult position these two aspects to analyze the research, obtains the author to our country present countryside collective ownership nationalization reform support, Some specific policies and suggestions on nationalization reform are put forward: first, to rebuild the structure of land ownership, to clarify the rights and interests and corresponding obligations in the development and utilization of land resources; second, to speed up the construction of democracy and legal system. Effectively protect the legitimate interests of all rights and interests of land resources.
【学位授予单位】：西南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F321.1

【参考文献】