王道与民主:评陆台新儒家之争——兼与刘悦笛先生商榷

发布时间：2018-06-09 17:14

本文选题：王道 + 民主　；参考：《探索与争鸣》2016年03期

【摘要】："港台新儒家"的继承者李明辉与"大陆新儒家"的中心人物蒋庆之间的争论,主要聚焦点在儒学与民主这一百年老问题。李明辉认为,儒学与民主没有根本性矛盾,儒家也应该接纳民主。蒋庆试图以其"王道政治"否定或超越民主政治,从而表现出原教旨儒学的特色。然而,蒋庆的"王道三重合法性"和"三院制"的设想,却未必尽合原始儒家的义理,亦难适用于现代社会。实际上,儒家王道政治的核心在于民本理念,民主政治是儒家民本理念的内在发展要求。应当承认儒家王道与西式民主各有其弊,中国民主政治的实践,应该是儒学与民主相辅相成而非互相拆台。至于儒学的发展前途,无论是心性儒学、政治儒学,还是情理儒学,抑或其他任何形式的儒学,恐都难以独占鳌头。对儒学的复兴与发展应该秉持一种健康的开放的心态。
[Abstract]:The dispute between Li Minghui, successor of the New Confucianism in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and Jiang Qing, the central figure of the New Confucianism in the mainland, mainly focused on the century-old issue of Confucianism and democracy. Li Minghui believes that there is no fundamental contradiction between Confucianism and democracy, and that Confucianism should accept democracy. Jiang Qing tried to negate or transcend democratic politics with his "royal politics", thus showing the characteristics of fundamentalist Confucianism. However, Jiang Qing's ideas of "the triple legitimacy of Wang Dao" and "three courts" may not fully accord with the justice of the primitive Confucianism and can hardly be applied to the modern society. In fact, the core of Confucian monarchical politics lies in the people-oriented concept, and democratic politics is the internal development requirement of the Confucian people-oriented idea. It should be acknowledged that Confucian monarchy and Western-style democracy have their own disadvantages. The practice of Chinese democratic politics should be that Confucianism and democracy complement each other rather than break down each other. As for the future of Confucianism, it is difficult to dominate the Confucianism, whether it is mental Confucianism, political Confucianism, rational Confucianism, or any other form of Confucianism. The revival and development of Confucianism should have a healthy and open mind.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学哲学系副教授暨中国现代思想文化研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“义观念研究”(14CZX021) 教育部基地重大研究项目“实践智慧:历史与理论”(11JJD720004)
【分类号】：B26

【相似文献】