自媒体时代公众人物言论自由与隐私权的冲突与协调——由毕福剑不雅视频事件说开去

发布时间：2018-06-14 13:45

本文选题：言论自由 + 隐私权　；参考：《学海》2015年04期

【摘要】：自媒体时代的言论表达方式和途径均呈现复杂多样态势,言论自由可以并且也日益得到最大化的享有。然而,在民主法治社会,言论的自由并非漫无边际,宪法法律的禁止性规定和其他基本权利构成对言论自由的基本限制。前不久发生的毕福剑不雅视频事件,再一次将言论自由与隐私权的话题炒热。从法律的视角观察,该事件为我们呈现出言论自由与隐私权之间多样态关系,使其有别于以往一方主体言论自由对另一方主体隐私权(或名誉权)的单维度冲突。通过剖析言论自由与隐私权之间的紧张关系,旨在找寻到调和权利间冲突的衡平之策,使言论自由继续保持生命力,而隐私权又能依法得以保全;让法治中国建设中的所有公民均免于恐惧,人与人之间更加信任而和谐相处。
[Abstract]:Since the media era, the ways and means of expression of speech have presented complex and diverse situation, freedom of speech can and increasingly get the maximum enjoyment. However, in a democratic society under the rule of law, the freedom of speech is not boundless. The prohibition of constitutional law and other basic rights constitute the basic restrictions on freedom of expression. Not long ago, the Bi Fujian indecent video incident, once again the topic of freedom of speech and privacy speculation. From the point of view of law, this event presents us with a multi-modal relationship between freedom of speech and privacy, which distinguishes us from the single dimension conflict between the freedom of speech of one party and the right to privacy (or reputation) of the other. By analyzing the tense relationship between the freedom of speech and the right to privacy, the aim is to find a balance between the conflicts of rights, so that freedom of speech can continue to maintain its vitality, and the right of privacy can be preserved in accordance with the law. To free all citizens of China under the rule of law from fear and to live in greater trust and harmony.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：G206

【参考文献】