协商民主的伦理价值基础
发布时间:2018-08-18 18:40
【摘要】:协商民主的伦理价值基础包括协商民主的良善性、合理性和正当性,协商民主的良善性表现为目的善和手段善,两者是相对的。协商民主的合理性分为实质合理性和形式合理性,两者多数情形下是统一的,但也可能形成对立和冲突。协商民主的正当性表现在协商理念的孕育变迁,原则的遵循,制度的建构以及实践行为的运作上。三者虽然意涵不一,侧重不同,但相互依托,相互促进,具有耦合性和协调性,共同夯实了协商民主的伦理道德支撑。
[Abstract]:The ethical value foundation of deliberative democracy includes the good nature, rationality and legitimacy of the deliberative democracy, and the good nature of the deliberative democracy is shown as the purpose good and the means good, and the two are relative. The rationality of deliberative democracy can be divided into substantive rationality and formal rationality, both of which are unified in most cases, but they may also form opposites and conflicts. The legitimacy of deliberative democracy lies in the gestation and change of the idea of negotiation, the adherence of principles, the construction of system and the operation of practice. Although they have different meanings and different emphases, they rely on each other, promote each other, have coupling and coordination, and together consolidate the ethical and moral support of deliberative democracy.
【作者单位】: 中南大学;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国政治论理思想通史”(项目编号:16ZDA103)
【分类号】:D621
本文编号:2190341
[Abstract]:The ethical value foundation of deliberative democracy includes the good nature, rationality and legitimacy of the deliberative democracy, and the good nature of the deliberative democracy is shown as the purpose good and the means good, and the two are relative. The rationality of deliberative democracy can be divided into substantive rationality and formal rationality, both of which are unified in most cases, but they may also form opposites and conflicts. The legitimacy of deliberative democracy lies in the gestation and change of the idea of negotiation, the adherence of principles, the construction of system and the operation of practice. Although they have different meanings and different emphases, they rely on each other, promote each other, have coupling and coordination, and together consolidate the ethical and moral support of deliberative democracy.
【作者单位】: 中南大学;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国政治论理思想通史”(项目编号:16ZDA103)
【分类号】:D621
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈爱华;当代家庭伦理价值取向的变革及伦理价值[J];人文杂志;1997年04期
2 霍红伟;;科学发展观的伦理价值分析[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年12期
3 薛晓萍;张国伏;;浅谈科学发展观的伦理价值[J];河北省社会主义学院学报;2009年02期
4 刘丽伟;;发达国家公共行政中伦理价值的确立与启示[J];学术交流;2006年02期
5 陈钧;孙中山“振兴中华”口号的伦理价值——兼论其对“黄祸论”的批驳[J];江汉论坛;2001年12期
6 王正平;徐铁光;;科学发展观的伦理价值[J];云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期
7 熊韵波;;构建节约型社会之政治伦理价值[J];山西大同大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
8 张建国;;构建社会主义和谐社会的伦理价值[J];福建省社会主义学院学报;2008年04期
9 傅鹏;刘云飞;;科学发展观的伦理价值研究[J];金田;2013年07期
10 林国治;;科学发展观的伦理透视[J];中共南昌市委党校学报;2009年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 潘亚玲;;论爱国主义:内涵与伦理价值[A];和谐世界 和平发展与文明多样性——上海市社会科学界第四届学术年会文集(2006年度)(世界经济·国际政治·国际关系学科卷)[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 刘广登;和谐社会建设中的政府义务[N];徐州日报;2006年
,本文编号:2190341
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2190341.html