杨幼炯的宪政思想
[Abstract]:Yang Youjiong's academic research mainly centers on political and legal ideological issues such as constitutionalism, constitutionalism and legislative theory. Especially in constitutionalism, he has been at the forefront of the research field at that time. Besides, he also made a thorough and meticulous study of modern legal thoughts, and made a comparison between the evolution and transformation of this trend of thought and the legislative spirit of the Five-Power Constitution. In addition to the above major research contributions, he also expressed his views on the issue of the rule of officials in China - no matter what kind of law is the code of conduct of the government and the people, if only the rule of law but no rule of man, the law is equivalent to nothingness. Yang Youjiong's viewpoint is of positive significance under the current situation of China's holding high the banner of anti-corruption. We should attach equal importance to the rule of law and the rule of man according to law, and regard the rule of man as an important part of the rule of the country. From the standpoint of science, the crystallization of the urgent political appeal is based on all social facts of ancient and modern history at home and abroad. The Three People's Principles are centered on people's survival, which coincides with the idea that law is created to meet the needs and requirements of human life. The Three People's Principles are completely self-established. In other words, social change is accompanied by changes in people's livelihood, and the form of social organization varies with changes in people's livelihood. As a result, the relations between the politics of the nation and the laws have been formed. The Three People's Principles are the comprehensive expression of the survival methods and relations. Democracy and constitutionalism are an inseparable system, but democracy and constitutionalism seem irreconcilable, because the focus of democracy is not entirely on the law, but more like a permanent human being. Every social civilization inevitably has to answer this question. Yang Youjiong specializes in the theme of democratic constitutionalism in many articles. In theory, we can divide democracy into direct democracy and representative democracy. Direct democracy is the citizen of the state. Everyone has the right to participate in state administration. In the current world situation, because of the huge population and the participation of everyone in state administration, there is bound to be chaos, so no country takes the form of direct democracy. But the chief drawback of this democracy is that, although these people were elected, their will was not enough to reflect the will of the majority of the electorate. Moreover, people lived in a much wider range than in ancient times and knew little about the candidates. Therefore, in reality, in order to make democracy possible to implement, democratic countries generally adopt a compromise approach, that is, representative democracy. The most obvious carrier is the representative body, that is, the House of Representatives. The first is that nationalism is revolutionary. On any occasion, nationalism has always been aimed at resisting the oppression of alien and foreign invaders, and then transforming and upgrading the country's comprehensive environment in order to seek its national personality, national freedom and long-term development of the nation itself. The first movement is the full practice of this spirit. Second, nationalism is democratic. Nationalism must not only overthrow the oppression of foreign nations, but also take the people as the main body to realize democratic politics. The civil rights movements in the 19th century, with democracy as the core, coincided with nationalism as the core. The French Revolution is the vanguard on this road when the national movement of the heart is united. Thirdly, nationalism is unified. Nationalism must unite the people under a whole and carry out a common political life. Nationalism without unity can never be called true nationalism because it loses the important condensation of nationalism. The realization of civil rights and the establishment of the system of civil rights are embodied in constitutionalism. "The implementation of constitutionalism is based on the use of civil rights. The implementation of constitutionalism is the beginning of building a strong legal force that supports people's freedom and equality, that is, the founding of a nation for the accomplishment of revolutionary purposes." His concept of constitutionalism differs from the early concepts of Europe and the United States, which are based on a bloody revolution. The unremitting efforts of the nationals within the country are the motive force, which eventually gives them the power to make a constitution, while the former is realized through the awakening of the national ideology and the efforts of the ruling party, thus avoiding the bloody revolution.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D909.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邹永达;应普及“宪政思想”[J];创造;2004年08期
2 孙婧;李大钊早期宪政思想研究[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2005年02期
3 田威;中国近代宪政思想述略[J];人大研究;2005年01期
4 林琳;浅谈李浩培的宪政思想[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2005年02期
5 杨红芳;;论五四宪法的宪政思想[J];沧桑;2008年02期
6 常建峰;;我国宪政思想的发展特点[J];法制与社会;2008年15期
7 张小花;;浅评孙中山宪政思想[J];法制与社会;2009年03期
8 杨振宏;;近代中国移植宪政思想失败的原因探析——以中日宪政思想发展历史对照为切入点[J];云南行政学院学报;2009年04期
9 赵秀芳;;毛泽东宪政思想研究综述[J];湖北社会科学;2010年08期
10 陈洪有;;梁启超宪政思想及其评析[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 袁伟东;;略论孙中山开放的宪政思想[A];“孙中山与近代中国的开放”学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
2 王连峰;;董必武宪政思想与政治文明[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第四辑)[C];2005年
3 冯朝勇;;1954年中华人民共和国宪法的宪政思想[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第四辑)[C];2005年
4 陈秋云;龙宪华;赵立;;传播与阻隔——美国宪政思想在清末的输入[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——英美法系及其对中国的影响[C];2008年
5 冯卓慧;;英美法对中国清末宪政思想的影响[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——20世纪外国经济法的前沿[C];2001年
6 吴家林;;简论李大钊早期宪政思想之基本内容及其实践活动[A];纪念李大钊诞辰120周年学术论文选集[C];2009年
7 韩大元;;董必武宪政思想初探[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第一辑)[C];2001年
8 朱最新;;浅论董必武的宪政思想[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第二辑)[C];2003年
9 王继军;;董必武宪政思想的历史解读——以法权观念为视角[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第五辑)[C];2006年
10 王继军;;董必武宪政思想的历史解读——以法权观念为视角[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第四辑)[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 吴茜;精彩诠释孙中山宪政思想[N];光明日报;2003年
2 吴茜;解读孙中山之宪政思想[N];中华读书报;2003年
3 林海曦;必须对权力进行规范[N];吉林日报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前7条
1 国怀林;孙中山宪政思想的发展阶段研究[D];南开大学;2009年
2 陈静熔;《独立评论》的宪政思想[D];重庆大学;2008年
3 李默海;孙中山的宪政思想及其实践问题研究[D];山东大学;2006年
4 杨阳;严复宪政思想研究[D];重庆大学;2008年
5 宋俭;新民主主义宪政思想研究[D];武汉大学;2004年
6 王人博;中国近代宪政思潮研究[D];中国政法大学;2001年
7 魏吉华;陈独秀宪政思想研究[D];扬州大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 史明磊;张佛泉的宪政思想研究[D];华中师范大学;2009年
2 韩星梅;合法性视阈下孙中山宪政思想研究[D];燕山大学;2015年
3 刘薇;中国共产党宪政思想研究[D];西安工业大学;2015年
4 戚艳婷;萧公权宪政思想述评[D];山东大学;2015年
5 朱超;康有为宪政思想研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年
6 赵冰玉;英国都铎王权的变化对宪政思想的影响[D];湘潭大学;2015年
7 董渊;康有为宪政思想研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2015年
8 刘灵香;戴季陶联邦宪政思想研究[D];湖南大学;2016年
9 刘伟超;杨幼炯的宪政思想[D];西南政法大学;2015年
10 张們;民国初期调和派宪政思想研究[D];山东大学;2009年
,本文编号:2249703
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2249703.html