法治原则下的行政裁决制度研究

发布时间：2019-04-27 20:37

【摘要】：在我国,随着依法行政的逐步推进,更多的行政行为被纳入法治化的轨道。法治的关键在于治权,治权的重中之重就是如何控制行政权。行政裁决权作为行政权的一种,在社会主义经济生活中发挥着有效配置经济资源、迅速化解社会矛盾的重要作用,它能否依法行使与人们的生活有着密切的关系。在和谐社会的背景下,行政裁决作为一种解纷的方式既能做到有效保障当事人的合法利益,又能减轻法院的负担,是一种理想的解纷方式。市场经济下行政管理对象的复杂化和贯彻司法程序的公正性决定了行政裁决产生和存在的必要性。但是现在国内对行政裁决制度的研究还不够全面,没有进行有效的整合,不能适应现代社会法律制度变迁的需要。本文的目的就是希望通过对我国行政裁决制度的历史与现状进行分析,在对其属性进行科学界定的基础上,进一步说明我国的行政裁决制度符合我国的法治原则,有其存在的必要,应加以完善。并通过对这一制度理论上的分析,揭示其在社会实践中存在的弊端,提出相应的对策,进行重构性设计。正文共分为四个部分：第一部分是对行政裁决的概念、特征进行界定和概括,明确行政裁决的性质,即行政裁决是一种准司法行政行为。然后阐述行政裁决的社会功能,明确其在解决社会纠纷,构建和谐社会中发挥着重要的作用。通过对比,分析我国行政裁决制度的事项范围存在的问题。第二部分是使用比较分析的方法,从行政裁决的主体、程序、以及救济制度等方面与国内外类似制度进行比较和区分,揭示我国行政裁决制度现存的问题,并分析症结所在,结合国内外已有的成功经验,提出对策。第三部分是通过描述行政裁决制度在不同历史时期的产生和发展变化,来分析这一制度的一般规律和特殊性,对其符合我国的法治原则进行论述,并分析制约我国行政裁决制度发展的因素。第四部分在客观评估和实证分析我国行政裁决现状的基础上,综合国外行政裁决制度与我国法治实践经验,对行政裁决制度提出重构性设计。行政裁决所具有的独特魅力,既适应了市场经济时代人们对司法救济迅速、低廉的要求,又弥补了行政诉讼的不足。因此我们必须完善行政裁决的相关制度,加强立法工作和执法力度,才能充分发挥行政裁决的作用。
[Abstract]:In our country, with the gradual advancement of administration according to law, more and more administrative acts have been brought into the track of rule by law. The key to the rule of law lies in the administration of power, the most important of which is how to control the executive power. As a kind of administrative power, administrative adjudication power plays an important role in the effective allocation of economic resources and the rapid resolution of social contradictions in socialist economic life. Whether it can be exercised in accordance with the law has a close relationship with people's lives. Under the background of harmonious society, administrative adjudication, as a way of resolving disputes, can not only effectively protect the legitimate interests of the parties concerned, but also lighten the burden of the court. It is an ideal way to resolve disputes. Under the market economy, the complexity of the administrative object and the justice of the judicial procedure determine the necessity of the emergence and existence of the administrative decision. However, the domestic research on the administrative adjudication system is not comprehensive enough, without effective integration, can not meet the needs of the changes of the modern social legal system. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the history and present situation of the administrative adjudication system in our country, and on the basis of the scientific definition of its attribute, the author further explains that the administrative adjudication system of our country conforms to the principle of rule of law in our country. There is a need for its existence, which should be perfected. Through the theoretical analysis of this system, the disadvantages of the system in the social practice are revealed, and the corresponding countermeasures are put forward, and the reconstruction design is carried out. The main body is divided into four parts: the first part is to define and generalize the concept and characteristics of the administrative award, and to clarify the nature of the administrative award, that is, the administrative award is a quasi-judicial administrative act. Then it expounds the social function of administrative adjudication and makes clear that it plays an important role in resolving social disputes and constructing harmonious society. Through the comparison, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the scope of the administrative adjudication system in China. The second part uses the method of comparative analysis, compares and distinguishes with the similar system at home and abroad from the subject, procedure and relief system of the administrative award, reveals the existing problems of the administrative adjudication system in our country, and analyzes the crux of the problem. Combined with the successful experience at home and abroad, the countermeasures are put forward. The third part is to describe the emergence and development of the administrative adjudication system in different historical periods, to analyze the general law and particularity of this system, and to discuss the principle of rule of law in accordance with the rule of law in our country. It also analyzes the factors that restrict the development of the administrative adjudication system in our country. In the fourth part, on the basis of objective evaluation and empirical analysis of the present situation of administrative adjudication in our country, combining the foreign administrative adjudication system with the practical experience of our country's rule of law, the author puts forward the reconstruction design of the administrative adjudication system. The unique charm of administrative adjudication not only adapts to the requirement of judicial relief rapidly and cheaply in market economy era, but also makes up for the deficiency of administrative litigation. Therefore, we must perfect the relevant system of administrative adjudication, strengthen the legislative work and enforce the law, in order to give full play to the role of administrative adjudication.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】