当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 法治论文 >

徐复观:独立舆论,民主评论

发布时间:2019-07-22 06:32
【摘要】:正以治史为长的徐复观,政论写作时明显多了一些历史的穿透力和厚重感。前不久,我所任职的凤凰网评论部组织策划了"有声之年——2015年度影响中国十大评论评选"。为什么要做十大评论评选?我们的期待有三:勾勒一张评论人眼中的中国问题之新闻地图,打捞那些渐行渐远渐无影的评论记忆,树立一个好评论标准的参照体系。关于好评论的标准,在"凤凰纵议院"访谈节目《好评论的标准是什么》中,我说好评论至少有四个标准,分别是选题价值、判断立场、人性标尺和预见性。按这个标准来衡量,徐复观的评论,
[Abstract]:Xu Fuguan, who is based on the history of governance, obviously has some historical penetration and heavy feelings in the writing of political theory. Not long ago, Phoenix New Media, who I worked for, organized and planned the "year of Sound-the Top Ten Review selection of influence on China in 2015." Why do you want to make the top ten reviews? There are three expectations: to outline a news map of China's problems in the eyes of commentators, to salvage memories of comments that are fading away, and to set up a good reference system for comment standards.? With regard to the criteria for good comments, in the Phoenix Longitudinal House talk program "what are the criteria for good comments," I said that there are at least four criteria for good comments, namely, the value of the topic, the judgment position, the measure of human nature and foresight. By this standard, Xu Fuguan's comments,
【作者单位】: 凤凰网;
【分类号】:G206


本文编号:2517434

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2517434.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b99fc***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com