社会保障的正义论基础
发布时间：2018-08-15 11:47
【摘要】：我国社会保障制度的形成与发展始终被视为再分配的一种工具和手段，试图缩小收入差距。特别是当下正义理念的提出更加推动了这一趋势。然而，正义是否等同于结果的平等，是否意味着劫富济贫，是否应由特定的主体来判定。显然，目前学界尚未给予明确地回应和翔实地阐释，导致对制度转轨中呈现的多方面问题无法进行根源性的反思。因此，笔者认为有必要以规范性的正义观作为研究的视角，来考察制度背后的价值准则是否合乎正义，反思现行制度是否良好地践行了正义的核心原则。 本文主要是通过对相关经典文献的阅读和比较，，向前追溯正义内涵的发展历程，并以有限理性和制度演化为理论基础，综合得出规范意义上的正义观，继而将其融入到社会保障制度的研究中。笔者发现，合乎正义的社会保障制度应该以不侵犯他人财产和自由为首要前提，提供有限的、规则平等的遵循市场竞争机制的多元主体的保障形式。遗憾的是，我国社会保障制度恰恰表现出与这些准则相违的各种非正义。最大的问题恐怕在于单中心治理模式下的强制缴费与再分配的扩大化。因此，笔者认为当下我们急需扭转与化解制度的畸形状态，特别是以正义原则作为依据，提出了若干解决思路。
[Abstract]:The formation and development of China's social security system has always been regarded as a tool and means of redistribution in an attempt to narrow the income gap. In particular, the concept of justice in the present put forward even more to promote this trend. However, whether justice is equal to equality of results, whether it means robbing the rich and helping the poor, should be judged by specific subjects. Obviously, the academic circles have not given a clear response and detailed explanation at present, which leads to the failure to reflect on the root causes of the various problems in the system transition. Therefore, the author thinks that it is necessary to take the normative view of justice as the research angle to examine whether the value criterion behind the system conforms to justice, and to reflect on whether the current system has carried out the core principles of justice. Through reading and comparing the relevant classical literature, this paper traces the development course of the connotation of justice, and based on the theory of limited rationality and institutional evolution, synthesizes the concept of justice in the sense of norm. Then it will be incorporated into the study of social security system. The author finds that a just social security system should be based on the premise of not infringing upon the property and freedom of others, and provide a limited, regular and equal form of protection for multiple subjects who follow the mechanism of market competition. Unfortunately, the social security system of our country just shows the injustice that disobeys these norms. The biggest problem is the expansion of mandatory payment and redistribution under the single-center governance model. Therefore, the author believes that we urgently need to reverse and resolve the malformation of the system, especially on the basis of the principle of justice, and put forward some solutions.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D632.1
本文编号：2184105
[Abstract]:The formation and development of China's social security system has always been regarded as a tool and means of redistribution in an attempt to narrow the income gap. In particular, the concept of justice in the present put forward even more to promote this trend. However, whether justice is equal to equality of results, whether it means robbing the rich and helping the poor, should be judged by specific subjects. Obviously, the academic circles have not given a clear response and detailed explanation at present, which leads to the failure to reflect on the root causes of the various problems in the system transition. Therefore, the author thinks that it is necessary to take the normative view of justice as the research angle to examine whether the value criterion behind the system conforms to justice, and to reflect on whether the current system has carried out the core principles of justice. Through reading and comparing the relevant classical literature, this paper traces the development course of the connotation of justice, and based on the theory of limited rationality and institutional evolution, synthesizes the concept of justice in the sense of norm. Then it will be incorporated into the study of social security system. The author finds that a just social security system should be based on the premise of not infringing upon the property and freedom of others, and provide a limited, regular and equal form of protection for multiple subjects who follow the mechanism of market competition. Unfortunately, the social security system of our country just shows the injustice that disobeys these norms. The biggest problem is the expansion of mandatory payment and redistribution under the single-center governance model. Therefore, the author believes that we urgently need to reverse and resolve the malformation of the system, especially on the basis of the principle of justice, and put forward some solutions.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D632.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张承惠;;国外社会保障与商业保险相结合的经验与启示[J];中国发展观察;2009年03期
2 张承惠;;国外社会保障与商业保险相结合的经验与启示[J];发展;2009年04期
3 张映芹;杨楠芝;;企业与行政事业单位养老金支付水平比较[J];南京人口管理干部学院学报;2012年04期
4 张克中;;公共治理之道:埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆理论述评[J];政治学研究;2009年06期
5 阳东辰;;社会转型期资源分配正义的结构性路径:一个框架性阐释[J];改革;2011年06期
6 房亚明;;民主、不平等与再分配:结果正义的维度[J];人文杂志;2010年03期
7 李琳;;中产阶层与分配正义[J];生产力研究;2009年07期
8 徐积平;;经济正义与社会公正的不相容性研究[J];学术界;2007年03期
9 张守夫;;社会保障的政治哲学基础:正义诸原则[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
10 马晓燕;;论当代中国社会转型期的正义问题[J];思想战线;2011年04期
本文编号：2184105
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/2184105.html
