思想史与学术史:异同之辨与观念自觉——以当前的马克思主义哲学研究为例

发布时间：2018-04-04 03:58

本文选题：思想史　切入点：学术史　出处：《河北学刊》2014年01期

【摘要】：思想是对客观事物及其本质和规律的理性把握,学术则是指在各个专业领域中发生作用的、学理性的系统知识。思想活动与学术活动存在很多相通之处,同时又在活动主体、活动特点、活动原则等方面存在着差异。与此相对应,思想史研究和学术史研究具有很大的交织性,但在研究目标、理论任务、对象范围、功能性质等方面又具有一定的差异性。这就要求我们于实际的研究活动中在二者之间保持一个相对合理的界限。当前马克思主义哲学研究中存在的片面倾向是未能合理区分这种差异的表现。与此同时,强调区别与差异,并非否认它们之间的统一性,而且绝不能把二者对立起来,否则同样会造成研究中的片面倾向。学术史的书写应当注意学术研究的基本要求,从而保持学术史的固有特征。
[Abstract]:Thought is the rational grasp of objective things and their essence and law, while scholarship refers to the systematic knowledge of learning reason which plays an important role in various professional fields.There are many similarities between ideological activities and academic activities, while there are differences in the subject, characteristics and principles of activities.Correspondingly, the study of the history of thought and the study of academic history are intertwined, but there are some differences in the research objectives, theoretical tasks, object scope, functional properties and so on.This requires us to maintain a relatively reasonable boundary between the two in actual research activities.At present, the one-sided tendency in the study of Marxist philosophy is that it is unable to distinguish this kind of difference reasonably.At the same time, the emphasis on distinction and difference is not to deny the unity between them, and they must not be opposed to each other, otherwise, it will also lead to one-sided tendency in the research.The writing of academic history should pay attention to the basic requirements of academic research so as to maintain the inherent characteristics of academic history.
【作者单位】：苏州大学哲学系;
【基金】：江苏省高校“青蓝工程”项目苏州大学“东吴学者计划”第三批高层次人才资助项目资助
【分类号】：C092

【共引文献】