城市重大工程引发的社会抗争事件研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 16:38

本文选题：重大工程 + 社会抗争　；参考：《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着中国社会经济变革的不断深入,导致了利益格局的急剧变化和价值观念的深刻变迁,社会抗争事件不断发生。近年来,上海城市建设日新月异,由此引发了一系列社会抗争事件,对此类社会抗争事件进行深入研究具有一定的价值和现实意义。本文在梳理国内外研究社会抗争的文献基础上,提出了自己的理论假设：城市重大工程在征求意见、决策和建设、运营过程中,一定数量行动者的利益受损及政府行为不规范是引发社会抗争事件的关键因素,抗争的激烈程度取决于(a)利益受损的程度,(b)政府在城市重大工程的各个环节中是否与行动者进行了有效的互动。重大工程引发的社会抗争事件,已经成为促进民主成长和制度变迁的重要力量。对政府行为和社会抗争机制各自进行阐述以后,结合抗争政治理论,本文尝试构建政府行为与社会抗争之间的动态分析框架。在城市重大工程征求意见、建设、运营三个敏感阶段,民众利益受损前提下,如果政府行为不规范就容易引发社会抗争事件。社会抗争事件发生以后,如果政府与民众缺乏深入有效的互动,就会造成抗争规模的转移和扩大。在完成了理论构建以后,本文转入现实层面去验证所提出的理论假设。首先,我们在面上回顾了上海近五年来城市重大工程的建设情况,以及由此引发的社会抗争事件。我们发现对民众利益没有造成损害或者损害较小的重大工程都没有引发社会抗争事件,凡是引发社会抗争的城市重大工程都对民众的利益造成了较大的损害,而且政府在推进工程建设的过程中许多行为不规范。其次,我们选择了沪杭磁悬浮上海机场联络线、虹桥综合交通枢纽两个案例进行深入分析。通过考察不同的案例以及同一个案例中的不同的人,我们发现利益受损的程度越大,民众抗争的强度越大。此外,我们发现在抗争事件动员、认同、抗争和规模扩大四个环节中,政府虽然与民众进行了一定程度的互动,但是互动的时机、方式、层级、角色、目的都存在问题,导致抗争规模不断扩大。再次,本文就城市重大工程建设过程中如何预防社会抗争事件的发生,以及在社会抗争事件中如何避免抗争规模的扩大提出自己的对策建议。最后,我们发现社会抗争事件一方面增强了民众的民主意识和丰富了民众的抗争经验,另一方面促进政府官员进行制度规范的反思,进而推动制度改革。社会抗争事件对我国的政治民主化进程有着积极的意义。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of China's social and economic changes, the rapid changes in the pattern of interests and the profound changes of values have led to social protest events. In recent years, the urban construction in Shanghai has changed with each passing day, which has led to a series of social protest events. It is of certain value and practical significance to study such social protest events. On the basis of combing the domestic and foreign literature on social protest, this paper puts forward its own theoretical hypothesis: in the process of soliciting opinions, making decisions and building and operating major urban projects, The damage to the interests of a certain number of actors and the non-standard behavior of the government are the key factors leading to social protest events. The intensity of the protest depends on the degree of the (a) interests being damaged. Whether the, (b) government interacts effectively with the actors in every aspect of the major urban projects. The social protest caused by major projects has become an important force to promote democratic growth and institutional change. After expounding the government behavior and the social resistance mechanism, and combining the theory of resistance politics, this paper tries to construct the dynamic analysis frame between government behavior and social protest. In the three sensitive stages of city major projects, such as soliciting opinions, construction and operation, and the interests of the public are damaged, if the government's behavior is not standardized, it is easy to cause social protest events. After the events of social protest, if the government and the people do not interact deeply and effectively, the scale of the struggle will be transferred and expanded. After completing the theoretical construction, this paper turns to the practical level to verify the proposed theoretical assumptions. First of all, we review the construction of major urban projects in Shanghai in the past five years, and the social protest events. We found that major projects that did not cause harm to the interests of the public or caused less damage did not lead to social protest events. All major urban projects that caused social protests did great harm to the interests of the people. And the government in the process of promoting the construction of many non-standard behavior. Secondly, we choose Shanghai-Hangzhou Maglev Shanghai Airport Liaison Line and Hongqiao Comprehensive Transportation Hub to carry out in-depth analysis. By examining different cases and different people in the same case, we find that the greater the degree of loss of interest, the greater the intensity of public protest. In addition, we find that in the four links of mobilization, identification, resistance, and scale expansion of the protest incident, although the government and the public interact to a certain extent, there are problems in the timing, manner, level, role, and purpose of the interaction. Leading to the scale of the struggle continues to expand. Thirdly, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to prevent the occurrence of social protest events and how to avoid the expansion of the scale of the social protest events in the construction of major urban projects. Finally, we find that the social protest event on the one hand strengthens the people's democratic consciousness and enriches the people's resistance experience, on the other hand, promotes the government officials to reflect on the system norms, and then promotes the system reform. The social protest event has the positive significance to our country's political democratization process.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：C913

【相似文献】