社会排斥归因对内隐攻击的影响

发布时间：2018-10-13 07:13

【摘要】：人们在受到社会排斥后往往会寻找被排斥的原因，而不同的归因会使人们产生不同的社会态度，随之影响人们的相关行为。本研究以辽宁师范大学的在校学生为研究对象，使用网络投球游戏启动排斥感，根据Sara Banki的研究编制了社会排斥的归因问卷，并采用三种不同的内隐攻击测量方式考察了社会排斥归因对内隐攻击的影响。实验一采用了攻击性词汇偏好的方法，探讨了社会排斥归因对内隐攻击的影响。结果表明：（1）情境类型对内隐攻击有显著影响，排斥情境中的内隐攻击得分显著高于接纳情境；（2）归因类型对内隐攻击没有显著的影响；（3）情境类型与归因类型的交互作用显著，当个体进行能力归因时，排斥情境中的内隐攻击得分显著高于接纳情境。实验二采用了攻击性词干补笔的方法，探讨了社会排斥归因对内隐攻击的影响。结果表明：（1）情境类型对内隐攻击有显著影响，排斥情境中的总体内隐攻击得分显著高于接纳情境，其中排斥情境中的身体内隐攻击得分与言语内隐攻击得分均显著高于接纳情境；（2）归因类型对内隐攻击有显著的影响，意图归因的总体内隐攻击得分显著高于能力归因，能力归因的总体内隐攻击得分显著低于综合归因，，其中意图归因的言语内隐攻击得分显著高于能力归因，能力归因的言语内隐攻击得分显著低于综合归因；（3）情境类型与归因类型交互作用显著，当个体进行能力归因与综合归因时，排斥情境中的总体内隐攻击得分显著高于接纳情境，但在身体内隐攻击得分与言语内隐攻击得分上情境类型与归因类型交互作用均不显著。实验三采用了内隐联想测验的方法，探讨了社会排斥归因对内隐攻击的影响。结果表明：（1）情境类型对内隐攻击有显著影响，且排斥情境组的内隐攻击程度显著高于接纳情境组；（2）归因类型对内隐攻击有显著影响，且意图归因的内隐攻击程度显著高于能力归因；（3）情境类型与归因类型的交互作用显著，当个体进行意图归因时，排斥情境中的内隐攻击程度显著高于接纳情境。综上所述，本研究得出以下结论： 1．不同情境类型对个体的内隐攻击程度有显著的影响，相对于社会接纳情境，社会排斥情境中的内隐攻击程度更强； 2．不同归因类型对个体的内隐攻击程度有显著的影响，意图归因的内隐攻击程度显著高于能力归因； 3．情境类型与归因类型的交互作用显著，且当个体进行能力归因、意图归因时，相对于社会接纳情境，社会排斥情境中的内隐攻击程度均更强。
[Abstract]:People often look for the reasons of exclusion after being excluded, and different attribution will make people have different social attitudes, and then affect people's related behavior. This study takes the students of Liaoning normal University as the research object, uses the network pitching game to start the rejection, according to the research of Sara Banki, compiled the attribution questionnaire of social exclusion. The effects of social exclusion attribution on implicit attack were investigated by using three different implicit attack measurement methods. In experiment 1, the influence of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression was investigated by using aggressive lexical preference. The results showed that: (1) situation type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the score of implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation, (2) attribution type had no significant effect on implicit attack. (3) the interaction between situational type and attribution type was significant, and the implicit attack score in exclusion context was significantly higher than that in receptive situation. In experiment two, the effect of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression was investigated by using the method of aggressive stem complement. The results showed that: (1) the type of situation had a significant effect on implicit attack, and the score of total implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. The score of body implicit attack and speech implicit attack in exclusion situation were significantly higher than that in acceptance situation; (2) Attribution type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the total implicit attack score of intention attribution was significantly higher than that of ability attribution. The total implicit attack score of ability attribution is significantly lower than that of comprehensive attribution, in which the score of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution, and the score of ability attribution is significantly lower than that of comprehensive attribution. (3) the interaction between situational type and attributional type was significant. When individuals were attributing ability and comprehensive attribution, the score of total implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. However, the interaction between situational type and attribution type was not significant in the score of body implicit attack and verbal implicit attack. Experiment 3 uses implicit association test to explore the effect of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression. The results showed that: (1) situation type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the degree of implicit attack in exclusion situation group was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation group, (2) attribution type had significant influence on implicit attack. The implicit attack degree of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution; (3) the interaction between situation type and attribution type is significant. When individuals make intention attribution, the degree of implicit attack in exclusion situation is significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. To sum up, this study draws the following conclusions: 1. Different types of situations have a significant impact on the degree of implicit aggression, compared with social acceptance situations, the degree of implicit aggression in social exclusion situations is stronger; 2. 2. Different attribution types have significant influence on the degree of implicit attack, the implicit attack degree of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution; 3. The interaction between situation type and attribution type is significant. And when individuals attribute ability and intention, the degree of implicit attack in social exclusion is stronger than that in social acceptance.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：C912.6

【参考文献】