独生与非独生大学生16种人格因素差异的Meta分析

发布时间：2018-01-14 10:32

本文关键词：独生与非独生大学生16种人格因素差异的Meta分析　出处：《现代预防医学》2016年22期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的了解独生与非独生大学生16种人格因素是否存在差异及其影响因素。方法采用Meta分析法对2004-2013年间的13篇入组研究文献(均采用16PF量表)共14组数据进行统计分析。结果 (1)独生大学生在乐群性、敢为性、敏感性、幻想性上的得分均高于非独生子女,平均效果量分别为d=0.10(P0.001),d=0.11(P0.05),d=0.09(P0.05),d=0.12(P0.001);失效安全系数Nfs0.05分别为48、17、36、10。(2)在多层线性模型中,恃强性、独立性受被试年级的影响(β1=-0.097,-0.097;均P0.05);兴奋性受发表刊物质量的影响(β1=0.095;P0.05);怀疑性受被试来源地(β1=0.075,P0.05)和量表版本(β1=0.097,P0.05)的影响。结论独生与非独生大学生在乐群性、敢为性、敏感性、幻想性4种人格因素方面存在统计学差异;恃强性、独立性与被试年级相关,兴奋性与发表刊物质量相关,怀疑性与被试来源地和量表版本相关。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate whether there are differences in 16 personality factors and their influencing factors between only and non-only college students. Methods Meta analysis was used to analyze 13 articles of study in the period 2004-2013 (. All the 14 groups of data were analyzed by 16PF scale. Results 1) the only students were in the group of music. The scores of daring, sensitivity and fantasy were higher than those of non-only children, and the average effect was 0.10g / P 0.001D ~ (0.11) / P ~ (0.05)). DX 0.09 (P0.05P0.05) 0.12m P0.001C; The failure safety factor (Nfs0.05) was 48 / 1717 / 36 / 10 / 2 respectively) in the multilevel linear model, the reliability and independence were affected by the grade (尾 _ 1 / -0.097). -0.097; P0.05; The excitability was affected by the quality of published publications (尾 1 0. 095; P0.05; Suspected sex was affected by the origin of the subjects (尾 1 / 0.075 / P 0.05) and the version of the scale (尾 1 / 0.097 / P 0.05). Conclusion\\\; There were significant differences in sensitivity and fantasy among the four personality factors. On the basis of strength, independence and grade, excitability was related to the quality of the publication, suspicion to the origin of the subjects and the version of the scale.
【作者单位】：贵阳中医学院医学人文学院心理学教研室;
【基金】：2014年贵州省教育厅高校人文社科规划研究项目,编号:14GH066
【分类号】：B848
【正文快照】： 近年来,研究者们采用卡特尔16种人格因素问卷(16 Personality Factor Questionnaire,简称16PF)对独生与非独生大学生人格差异进行了较多的研究,认为二者在人格特征上存在不同程度的差异。但具体是在哪些人格特征上存在差异,其结果又不尽一致。为此,本研究对近10年(2004-2013年

【相似文献】