当代大学生尚“和”心理测量量表的编制
发布时间:2018-02-14 13:13
本文关键词: 尚“和” 大学生 量表编制 初步应用 出处:《四川师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:摘要:中国传统文化非常重视“和”,尚“和”已经成为中国人的集体潜意识。当代大学生既受传统文化以和为贵的影响,又受到西方竞争意识、个性张扬、自我等思想的影响。有些大学生对待尚“和”的态度已经出现歪曲理解。他们认为尚“和”会丧失自我、失去机会等等。因此研究尚“和”具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。 本研究采用文献法、语义分析法、访谈法、问卷调查法对当代大学生的尚“和”心理进行系统探讨,包括探讨分析尚“和”心理的内涵、运作过程、建构尚“和”心理理论及编制尚“和”心理测量量表。 本研究将尚“和”划分为四个维度,即尚“和”认知、尚“和”情绪、尚“和”动机、尚“和”行为。编制了大学生尚“和”心理测量量表,量表具有良好的信效度。 本研究得到如下结论: (l)尚“和”心理是一个多层次、多维度的心理结构。研究结果与大学生尚“和”心理理论的构想是一致的,大学生尚“和”心理可以分为尚“和”认知、尚“和”情绪、尚“和”动机、尚“和”行为四个维度。 (2)大学生尚“和”测量量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为测量尚“和”的适宜工具。 (3)总体而言,大学生的尚“和”水平普遍偏高,大部分的学生都比较认同尚“和”,认为在人际交往过程中应该以和为贵。 (4)在性别上,,尚“和”情绪和尚“和”行为两个维度上存在男女性别差异,女大学生尚“和”情绪得分高于男大学生;女大学生尚“和”行为得分低于男大学生。这说明,女生在情绪上表现的较为尚“和”,但在行为上却不如男生。 (5)在城乡上,尚“和”情绪维度和总分上存在城乡差异。城镇大学生尚“和”情绪得分低于农村大学生;城镇大学生尚“和”总分得分低于农村大学生。这说明农村大学生要比城镇大学生尚“和”水平高。 (6)所有维度和总分不存在独生子女与非独生子女、年级差异性。这说明,年级、独生子女与非独生子女对尚“和”水平没有明显的影响。
[Abstract]:Abstract : China ' s traditional culture attaches great importance to " and " , yet " and " has become the collective subconscious of Chinese people . Contemporary college students are influenced by traditional culture , and are influenced by western competition consciousness , personality , self - and so on . Some college students have distorted understanding of attitude towards " and " . They think that " and " will lose their self , loss of opportunity and so on . Therefore , the study of " and " has important theoretical value and practical significance . This research adopts the literature method , the semantic analysis method , the interview method , the questionnaire method to the contemporary college students ' " and " psychology , including the analysis of the " psychology " and " the psychological connotation , the operation process , the construction " and " psychological theory and the preparation of the Shang " and " psychological measurement scale . " This research has divided the " and " into four dimensions , namely " Shang" and " cognition , Shang " and " emotion , Shang " and " motivation , Shang " and " behavior " . The college students " and " psychological measurement scale " have been prepared , and the scale has good faith validity . The study has the following conclusions : ( l ) The " psychology is a multi - level , multi - dimensional psychological structure . " The results of the study are consistent with the concept of " college students " and " psychological theory " , " university students " and " psychology can be divided into " and " cognition , still " and " emotion , Shang " and " motive , Shang " and " behavior " four dimensions . ( 2 ) The college students " and " measurement scale have good reliability and validity , which can be used as a suitable tool for measuring " and " . ( 3 ) Generally speaking , college students ' " and " level is generally high , most students agree with " and " , think that in the process of interpersonal communication should be very harmonious . ( 4 ) There are gender differences between male and female , female college students and emotional scores above male students in two dimensions of gender , sex , and behavior , while female college students and behavior scores are lower than that of male students . This shows that girls are more " and " in emotional performance , but they are not as good as boys in behavior . ( 5 ) There are urban and rural differences in both the urban and rural areas , the " emotional dimension and the total score " . The " urban college students " and " mood scores are lower than that of the rural students " . The " urban college students " and " total scores " are lower than that of the rural students . This means that the rural students are still " and " higher than the urban students . ( 6 ) All dimensions and total scores do not have the difference between the only one child and the non - single child , the grade difference . This shows that there is no obvious influence on the " and " level between the first grade , the only child and the non - single child .
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:B841
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 黄如金;;和合管理的真谛:和气生财,合作制胜[J];管理学报;2007年03期
2 方克立;;关于和谐文化研究的几点看法[J];高校理论战线;2007年05期
3 赵凤娟;大学生人际冲突应对教育浅探[J];思想理论教育导刊;2004年09期
4 汪凤炎;尚“和”:中国人的集体潜意识[J];江西师范大学学报;2001年01期
本文编号:1510781
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1510781.html