独处的满足状态对情绪的影响
发布时间：2018-04-04 13:19
本文选题：独处需要 切入点：满足状态 出处：《哈尔滨师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】：目的：（1）探讨被试在独处满足和不满足条件下情绪的差异；（2）探讨不同独处能力者在独处不满足条件下情绪的差异；（3）探讨被试在不同独处延迟满足情境下情绪的差异。方法：（1）实验一：以招募自愿报名的大学生为被试，使用CAPS情绪图片系统，采用单因素重复测量实验设计，自变量为测量时间（2个水平）：前测和后测；因变量为情绪的效价和唤醒度的得分。（2）实验二：以《独处能力量表》为筛选工具，筛选出独处能力高分组8名、独处能力中分组13名和独处能力低分组8名，使用CAPS情绪图片系统，采用3×2混合实验设计，被试间变量为被试类型（3个水平）：高独处能力组、中独处能力组和低独处能力组，被试内变量为测量时间（2个水平）：前测和后测；因变量为情绪效价和唤醒度的得分。（3）实验三：从实验二中筛选的独处能力中分组选取30名被试，使用仪器皮阻皮温计，采用3（延迟满足情境：奖励物条件、无奖励物条件和问题解决条件）*6（测量时间：T1、T2、T3、T4、T5、T6、）混合实验设计，其中延迟满足情境为被试间变量；实验阶段为被试内变量，基线值T1作为协变量，因变量为皮肤电阻数值。结果：（1）实验一中，独处满足组：情绪的积极效价差异不显著（F=0.234，p=0.630），中性效价差异不显著（F=0.642，p=0.424），消极效价差异不显著（F=2.888，p=0.091），积极唤醒度差异不显著（F=0.005，p=0.944），中性唤醒度差异不显著（F=2.792，p=0.096），消极唤醒度差异显著（F=6.858，p=0.010）；独处不满足组：情绪的积极唤醒度不显著（F=0.733，p=0.393），中性唤醒度差异不显著（F=1.845，，p=0.176），情绪的积极效价差异显著（F=35.861，p=0.000），中性效价差异显著（F=18.669，p=0.000），消极效价差异显著（F=21.567，p=0.000），消极唤醒度差异显著（F=24.108，p=0.000）。（2）实验二中，积极效价：独处能力主效应不显著（F=2.082，p=0.126），测量时间主效应显著（F=63.256，p=0.000），独处能力与测量时间的交互作用显著（F=15.921，p=0.000）；积极唤醒度：独处能力主效应显著（F=3.304，p=0.038），测量时间主效应不显著（F=0.368，p=0.545），独处能力与测量时间交互作用不显著（F=0.448，p=0.639）；消极唤醒度：独处能力主效应显著（F=13.840，p=0.000），测量时间主效应显著（F=12.108，p=0.001），独处能力与测量时间交互作用显著（F=7.837，p=0.000）。（3）实验三中，测量时间主效应显著（F=4.125，p=0.004），延迟满足情境主效应显著（F=4.683，p=0.020），测量时间与延迟满足情境交互作用不显著（F=0.193，p=0.991）。结论：（1）在独处满足条件下，被试情绪差异不显著；在独处不满足条件下，情绪差异显著。（2）在独处不满足条件下，独处能力高分组的情绪差异显著。（3）在独处的延迟满足情境中，问题解决条件下情绪差异显著。
[Abstract]:Objective: (1) to explore the emotional differences of subjects under the conditions of solitude satisfaction and discontentment. (2) to explore the emotional differences of individuals with different solitude abilities under the condition of solitude discontentment. (3) to explore the emotional differences of subjects in different solitude delayed satisfaction situations.Methods: experiment 1: using CAPS emotion picture system, single factor repeated measurement design was used. The independent variables were measured time (2 levels: pre test and post test).The dependent variable was emotion titer and arousal degree. Experiment 2: using the solitude ability scale as a screening tool, 8 patients with high solitude ability, 13 with solitude ability and 8 with low solitude ability were selected.Using the CAPS emotion picture system, the 3 脳 2 mixed experiment design was used. The variables among the subjects were the type of subjects (three levels: high solitude ability group, middle solitude ability group and low solitude ability group), and the inner-subjects variables were measuring time (two levels: pre-test and post-test);The dependent variable is the score of emotional titer and arousal degree. Experiment 3: from the solitude ability selected in experiment 2, 30 subjects were divided into three groups.The mixed experimental design of no reward condition and problem solving condition (measuring time: T1T1T2OT3T4T4T5T6) was designed, in which the delayed satisfaction situation was the inter-subjects variable, the experiment stage was the in-test variable, the baseline value T1 was the covariable, and the dependent variable was the skin resistance value.Result: 1) experiment 1,鐙婊¤冻缁
本文编号：1710117
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1710117.html
