在完全随机且不同SOA条件下的情绪与语义启动比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-14 04:26

本文选题：情绪启动 + 语义启动　；参考：《辽宁师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的：在完全随机情况下通过设置不同的启动刺激与靶子刺激的时间间隔来比较情绪、语义启动之间的强弱，先后等问题。方法：使用E-prime软件，进行实验的编程，后在完全随机且启靶时间间隔不同的实验设计条件下完成实验任务。合理的使用SPSS17.0与excel软件对实验数据进行处理。结果：实验数据以正确率为指标：（1）SOA=50ms，图片情绪与启靶一致性二者交互作用显著，F（1,31）=5.758，P＜0.05。结果显示消极图片条件下，一致性正确率高于不一致性。其次，图片情绪、启靶一致性与靶子类型三者交互作用显著，F(1,31)=5.359，P＜0.05。进一步简单简单效应分析显示：消极一致的语义启动中出现了促进效应，而消极不一致的语义启动中出现了阻碍效应。（2）SOA=250ms，靶子类型、图片情绪、启靶一致性三者交互作用边缘显著，F（1，31）=3.594，p=0.067。（3）SOA=500ms，图片情绪与启靶关系一致性交互作用显著，F（1,31）=22.201，p＜0.01，启动刺激为消极图片时，，一致条件下正确率高于不一致条件。其次，靶子类型、图片情绪、启靶关系一致性交互作用显著，F(1，31)=11.277，P＜0.01。进一步简单简单效应分析结果：消极、积极一致的情绪启动中均出现了促进效应，不一致条件下出现了反转效应。实验数据以反应时为指标：（1）SOA=50ms，一致性主效应显著，启靶关系一致快于启靶关系不一致，F=（1,31），p＜0.05。其次，靶子类型与图片情绪的交互作用显著，F=（1,31），p＜0.05，情绪启动条件下，消极情绪图片反应快于积极图片。（2）SOA=250ms，图片效价主效应显著，F（1,31）=19.473，p＜0.01，积极情绪快于消极情绪。其次，启靶关系一致性主效应边缘显著，F(1，31)=8.855，P=0.05，一致性快于不一致性。图片效价，图片性别与启靶关系一致性交互作用显著。（3）SOA=500ms，图片性别与启靶关系一致性交互作用边缘显著，F（1,31）=4.037， p=0.053，启动图片为男性时被试的反应快于启动图片为女性。其次，靶子类型、图片性别、启靶关系一致性三者交互作用显著，F(1，31)=10.607，P＜0.05。进一步简单简单效应分析结果：启动刺激为男性图片的语义启动在启靶关系一致、不一致出现了反转效应，相同情况的女性启动图片一致条件下出现促进效应、启靶关系不一致条件下出现了阻碍效应。结论：（1）SOA影响情绪启动和语义启动的比较研究；（2）完全随机条件下，自动化加工以及控制加工的情绪、语义启动优先性，强弱尚未可定；（3）完全随机条件下，自动化加工以及控制加工均易产生反转效应。
[Abstract]:Aim: to compare emotion, the strength between semantic priming and the sequence of stimuli by setting different time intervals between priming and target stimuli under complete random conditions.Methods: E-prime software was used to program the experiment, and then the experiment task was completed under the condition of complete randomness and different time interval.Reasonable use of SPSS17.0 and excel software to process the experimental data.Results: the correct rate was used as the index of 50 ms.The interaction between image emotion and target initiation consistency was significant (P < 0.05).The results showed that the accuracy of consistency was higher than that of inconsistency.Secondly, the interaction among image emotion, target initiation consistency and target type was significant (P < 0.05).Further simple effect analysis showed that there were promotive effects in negative consistent semantic priming, and hindrance effect in negative inconsistent semantic priming, target type, image emotion, and hindrance effect in negative inconsistent semantic priming.The interaction edge of the three factors was significant (F ~ (1)) ~ (31) ~ (1) ~ (3.594) ~ (0.067.3) ~ (3) SOA ~ (5) ~ (500) m 路s, and the interaction between image emotion and the relationship between initiation and target initiation was significant (P < 0.01). When the priming stimulus was a negative picture, the correct rate was higher in the consistent condition than in the inconsistent condition.Secondly, the interaction of target type, picture emotion, and consistency between the two groups was significant (P < 0.01).The results of simple and simple effect analysis were as follows: both negative and positive consistent emotional priming had a promotive effect and a reverse effect under inconsistent conditions.The experimental data take the reaction time as the index of 50 ms, and the consistency of the main effect is significant, and the consistent relation is faster than that of the inconsistency of the starting-target relationship, and the consistency of the starting-target relationship is lower than that of the starting-target relationship (P < 0.05).Secondly, the interaction between target type and image emotion was significant (P < 0.05). Under the condition of emotional priming, the response of negative emotional picture was faster than that of positive picture. The main effect of image titer was significantly higher than that of F1 / 31 / 19.473p < 0.01, and that of positive emotion was faster than that of negative emotion.Secondly, the consistency of the main effect edge of the starting-target relationship is significantly higher than that of the inconsistency, and the consistency is faster than that of the inconsistency.The interaction between image sex and target initiation relationship was significant. The interaction between image sex and target initiation relationship was significant. The edge of the interaction between image sex and target relationship consistency was significant (4.037, p0.053). The response of the subjects when the starting picture was male was faster than that of female.Secondly, the interaction among target type, image sex and the consistency of the relationship between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05).The results of simple and simple effect analysis showed that the priming stimulus was the semantic priming of male image, and the reverse effect appeared in the inconsistency, and the promotion effect appeared in the same condition in the female priming image.The hindrance effect appears under the condition of the inconsistency of the starting-target relationship.Conclusion A comparative study on the influence of SOA on emotional priming and semantic priming;2) under completely random condition, the emotion and semantic priming priority of automatic processing and control processing are not determined;3) under complete random condition, automatic machining and controlled machining are prone to reverse effect.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842

【参考文献】