社会排斥情境下死亡凸显对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响
发布时间:2018-04-17 18:32
本文选题:社会排斥 + 死亡凸显 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:社会上反社会行为频繁发生,回顾以往研究发现大多数反社会行为是因社会排斥而产生,而社会排斥本身无论是来自社会还是来自他人,都很难做到从源头上避免,因此,探究如何减少社会排斥情境下的反社会行为显得尤为重要。但纵观研究,目前很少有研究把死亡凸显与反社会行为相联系,尚无研究探究在社会排斥情境下死亡凸显对反社会行为的影响。本研究旨在探究在社会排斥情境下,死亡凸显对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响,主要考察死亡凸显的作用。本文一共包括三个主要实验,实验一拟通过操纵被试的社会排斥,并测量二选一博弈框架来研究被试的反社会行为博弈偏好。实验二拟通过操纵被试的死亡凸显,并测量二选一博弈框架来研究被试的反社会行为博弈偏好。实验三拟通过操纵被试的社会排斥和死亡凸显并测量二选一博弈框架来研究社会排斥情境下死亡凸显对被试反社会行为博弈偏好的影响。研究得到以下结论:(1)实验一验证了社会排斥对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响,即社会排斥对反社会行为博弈偏好具有显著正向影响,相比于非社会排斥组被试,社会排斥组被试更容易进行反社会行为选择;(2)实验二探究了死亡凸显对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响,即与非死亡凸显组被试相比,死亡凸显组被试更少进行反社会行为博弈选择;(3)实验三探究了在社会排斥情境下,死亡凸显对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响,与社会排斥情境下无死亡凸显相比,死亡凸显明显削弱了社会排斥对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响。本研究发现,社会排斥可以显著影响反社会行为博弈偏好,即受到社会排斥的被试更容易做出反社会行为选择,而加入死亡凸显后,反社会行为选择明显减少。回顾以往研究,多从社会排斥角度研究反社会行为,但在社会排斥情境下,引入死亡凸显来进行反社会行为研究的相对较少。社会排斥难以避免,而反社会行为却急需解决,若引入死亡凸显,让人们在无意识中对死亡进行思考,从而降低反社会行为的几率未尝不是一件好事。本研究基于现实出发,探究在社会排斥情境下,死亡凸显对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响。不仅论证了社会排斥、死亡凸显、反社会行为博弈三个变量之间的关系,还为反社会行为的研究提供了更多的实验支持,丰富了以往的研究,并为反社会行为的解决与补救提供了新思路。
[Abstract]:Antisocial behavior occurs frequently in society. Reviewing previous studies, it is found that most antisocial behaviors occur as a result of social exclusion, and social exclusion itself is difficult to avoid at its source, either from society or from others.It is very important to explore how to reduce the anti-social behavior in the situation of social exclusion.However, there are few studies on the relationship between death salience and antisocial behavior, and there is no research on the influence of death highlight on antisocial behavior in the social exclusion situation.The purpose of this study is to explore the influence of death highlight on antisocial behavior game preference under the social exclusion situation.There are three main experiments in this paper. Experiment one is to study the preference of antisocial behavior game by manipulating the social exclusion of the subjects and measuring a game framework from two out of the two.In the second experiment, the death salience of the subjects was manipulated, and the antisocial behavior game preference of the subjects was studied by choosing a game framework from two out of the two.By manipulating the social exclusion and death salience of the subjects and measuring the influence of death salience on the antisocial behavior game preference of the participants in the social exclusion situation, the third experiment was designed to measure the two game frameworks to study the influence of death salience on the antisocial behavior game preference of the participants.The following conclusions are obtained: 1) experiment 1 verifies the influence of social exclusion on antisocial behavior game preference, that is, social exclusion has a significant positive effect on antisocial behavior game preference, compared with non-social exclusion group.The second experiment explored the influence of death highlight on the preference of antisocial behavior game, that is, compared with the non-death salient group.Death highlight group less antisocial behavior game selection 3) the third study explored the impact of death highlight on antisocial behavior game preference under the social exclusion situation, compared with no death highlight in social exclusion situation. 3. The third experiment explored the influence of death highlight on antisocial behavior game preference in the social exclusion situation, compared with no death highlight in the social exclusion situation.Death highlights significantly weaken the influence of social exclusion on antisocial behavior game preference.This study found that social exclusion can significantly affect the preference of antisocial behavior game, that is, subjects who are subject to social exclusion are more likely to make antisocial behavior choices, but after death highlights, the choice of antisocial behavior significantly decreases.In retrospect, antisocial behaviors are mostly studied from the perspective of social exclusion, but in the context of social exclusion, relatively few studies are carried out by introducing death salience to study antisocial behaviors.Social exclusion is hard to avoid, but antisocial behavior needs to be solved urgently. It is not a bad thing to introduce death highlight to make people think about death in the unconscious, thus reducing the probability of antisocial behavior.Based on reality, this study explores the influence of death on antisocial behavior game preference in the context of social exclusion.It not only demonstrates the relationship among the three variables of social exclusion, death highlight and antisocial behavior game, but also provides more experimental support for the study of antisocial behavior, and enriches the previous research.It also provides a new idea for the solution and remedy of anti-social behavior.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B848
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈欣;叶浩生;;行为博弈视野下信任研究的回顾[J];心理科学;2009年03期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 肖芳;周方召;;存在监管的司法寻租行为博弈分析[A];2005年中国法经济学论坛会议论文集[C];2005年
2 余竞;李竹渝;鲁万波;H.Hennig-Schmidt;;议价行为博弈中的不确定性因素最后通牒式谈判的实验研究[A];加入WTO和中国科技与可持续发展——挑战与机遇、责任和对策(上册)[C];2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 苑馨竹;社会排斥情境下死亡凸显对反社会行为博弈偏好的影响[D];吉林大学;2017年
2 林李亚;投资期权的行为博弈分析[D];华中科技大学;2006年
3 丁荣;城市房屋征收补偿的行为博弈分析[D];中南大学;2012年
4 陆媛媛;高校新校区建设贷款行为博弈分析[D];西南交通大学;2005年
5 范雪莲;从行为博弈视角探讨几个经典博弈模型的改进[D];云南大学;2012年
6 陈云燕;转轨时期我国征纳行为博弈分析[D];西南财经大学;2004年
,本文编号:1764772
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1764772.html