心理治疗循证实践中“证据”的四个基本问题

发布时间：2018-05-02 00:58

本文选题：心理治疗 + 循证实践　；参考：《心理学报》2017年06期

【摘要】：循证实践正在成为西方心理治疗发展的主流方向。但如何理解循证实践的"证据"仍是见仁见智。部分社会大众甚至心理学专家仅将"循证"当作一种"修辞"或"时尚",顾名思义地界定"证据",或按主观信仰随意地选择与应用"证据"。文章以"证据"为研究焦点,试图建构系统理解"证据"的全面图景,探讨了心理治疗循证实践中关于"证据"的4个基本问题:(1)从历史考察与理论分析的视角出发,探讨了"心理治疗为什么需要证据";(2)从证据的类型范围、生产者及存在形式三个视角,描述了"心理治疗存在哪些证据";(3)从证据的科学程度、研究设计的严谨程度及解决实践问题的契合程度出发,阐述了"哪些证据才是好的证据";(4)从6个步骤推广证据及创新研究设计两个方面展开,分析了"在现实世界中如何推广与应用证据"。
[Abstract]:Evidence-based practice is becoming the mainstream of the development of western psychotherapy. However, how to understand the evidence of evidence-based practice is still a matter of opinion. Some social and even psychological experts only regard "evidence-based" as a kind of "rhetoric" or "fashion", define "evidence" as its name implies, or choose and apply "evidence" at will according to their subjective beliefs. Taking "evidence" as the research focus, this paper attempts to construct a comprehensive picture of the systematic understanding of "evidence", and probes into the four basic questions of "evidence" in the evidence-based practice of psychotherapy: 1) from the perspective of historical investigation and theoretical analysis. This paper probes into why psychotherapy needs evidence from three angles of view: the category of evidence, the producer and the form of existence, and describes the scientific degree of "what evidence does psychotherapy exist" from evidence. Starting from the degree of rigor of research and design and the degree of conformity of solving practical problems, this paper expounds "what evidence is good evidence" and "what kind of evidence is good evidence" from six aspects of popularizing evidence and innovating research design. This paper analyzes how to popularize and apply evidence in the real world.
【作者单位】：广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心;南方医科大学公共卫生学院心理学系;加拿大卡尔加里大学心理学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金教育学青年项目(CBA130124)资助
【分类号】：B849

【相似文献】