中国父母教养方式评价量表的编制及其信效度的研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 01:21

本文选题：中国 + 父母教养方式　；参考：《皖南医学院》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的：通过调查研究确定具有中国国情和文化背景下的教养方式的评价维度，编制一套适用于国内教养方式的评价量表，并对其进行信效度检验。研究父母教养方式特点，探讨人口学变量对父母教养方式差异的影响。方法：研究严格按照心理学量表编制的程序。在文献综述的基础上，根据理论构想结合对150名专家和大学生开放式问卷调查，，编制了父母教养方式的初试量表。然后对390名大学生进行初试量表的调查后，运用探索性因素分析进一步形成了正式量表，并运用验证性因素分析验证研究的结构模型。最后收集1458份正式量表，运用多种信效度检验方法验证量表的信效度，并调查研究中国父母教养方式的特点。结果： 1.探索性因素分析KMO值为0.931，验证性因素分析，χ2/df、RMSE、NFI、NNFI、IFI、CFI、GFI、AGFI指数分别是3.605、0.039、0.835、0.882、0.806、0.805、0.892、0.860。 2.信度：量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.717-0.893之间；分半信度在0.691-0.875之间；重测信度在0.725-0.871之间。 2.效度：各维度得分与量表总分的相关系数在0.770—0.894之间；各个维度之间的相关系数在0.457—0.755之间。与效标量表比较，民主关怀因子与情感温暖型的相关系数为0.675，；情感联系因子与情感温暖型的相关系数为0.722，；专制粗暴因子与专制型的相关系数为0.806；管教引导因子与信任鼓励型的相关系数为0.599；宽容理解与信任鼓励型的相关系数为0.649；两个量表总分的相关系数为0.830。结论： 1.父母教养方式是受多种因素影响的动态和静态不断交替变换的行为方式和风格，本研究编制的评价量表是由民主关怀、情感联系、专制粗暴、管教引导、宽容理解构成的多因子结构，该量表具有很好的模型结构。 2.参照父母教养方式结构的理论构想，编制了父母教养方式评价量表对1458名中学生进行调查研究,结果表明该量表的内部一致性系数、分半信度、内容效度、效标效度等信效度指标均比较好，所以父母教养方式评价量表适宜作为评价父母教养方式的评价工具。 3.父母教养方式的情感联系得分最高，其次为管教引导、宽容理解、民主关怀，专制粗暴得分最低。 4.父母教养方式在不同的子女性别、居住地、家庭类型以及父母的职业和文化等方面得分差异很大。
[Abstract]:Objective: to determine the evaluation dimension of upbringing style under Chinese national conditions and cultural background, and to develop a set of evaluation scale for domestic upbringing style, and to test its reliability and validity. To study the characteristics of parental rearing style and the influence of demographic variables on parental rearing style. Methods: the program of psychological scale was studied. On the basis of literature review, an open questionnaire survey of 150 experts and college students was carried out according to the theory and conception, and the first test scale of parental rearing style was compiled. After the investigation of 390 college students, the formal scale was further formed by exploratory factor analysis, and the structural model of the study was verified by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, 1458 formal scales were collected to verify the reliability and validity of the scale by various reliability and validity tests, and the characteristics of Chinese parental rearing styles were investigated. Results: 1. Exploratory factor analysis (KMO) was 0.931, and confirmatory factor analysis (蠂 ~ 2 / dfN) showed that the AGFI index of KMO was 3.6050.39 卤0.8350.882n 0.806U 0.8050.8920.860, respectively. 2. Reliability: the Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of the scale was 0.717-0.893, the split-half reliability was 0.691-0.875, and the test-retest reliability was 0.725-0.871. 2. Validity: the correlation coefficient between the scores of each dimension and the total score of the scale was 0.770-0.894, and the correlation coefficient between each dimension was between 0.457-0.755. Compared with the effect scale, The correlation coefficient between democratic care factor and affective warmth type is 0.675, the correlation coefficient between affective relation factor and affective warm type is 0.722, the correlation coefficient between autocratic and autocratic factor is 0.806, and the relationship between correctional guidance factor and trust and encouragement type is 0.806. The correlation coefficient between tolerance, understanding and trust and encouragement was 0.649, and the correlation coefficient of the total score of the two scales was 0.830. Conclusion: 1. Parental rearing style is a dynamic and static alternating behavior style and style influenced by many factors. The evaluation scale developed in this study is guided by democratic concern, emotional connection, tyranny and discipline. Tolerance and understanding of the multi-factor structure, the scale has a good model structure. 2. According to the theoretical conception of parental rearing style structure, 1458 middle school students were investigated with the parental rearing style evaluation scale. The results showed that the internal consistency coefficient, split-half reliability, content validity of the scale were analyzed. The reliability and validity of standard validity were good, so the parental rearing style evaluation scale was suitable as an evaluation tool for parents' rearing style. 3. Parental rearing style had the highest score of emotional connection, followed by guidance of discipline, tolerance and understanding, democratic care, and tyranny and rudeness. 4. Parental rearing styles differ greatly in terms of gender, residence, family type, occupation and culture of the child.
【学位授予单位】：皖南医学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B844

【参考文献】