中国人人际责任感问卷的研制

发布时间：2018-05-14 09:44

本文选题：人际责任感 + 人际责任感问卷　；参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年05期

【摘要】：目的:编制适合当代中国人的人际责任感测量工具,并进行信效度检验。方法:立足中国的传统文化,在文献分析基础上结合开放式调查,经内容分析后初步建构了中国人人际责任感的理论结构;根据结构构想,编制了中国人人际责任感问卷,在全国多省市成人样本中进行多次施测,进行测量学指标检验。结果:(1)中国人人际责任感问卷包含六个维度,分别是尊重呵护、关爱体贴、助人担当、重情有义、不为难损伤、可靠守信,共29个项目;(2)总量表与各维度的内部一致性信度α系数在0.698~0.933之间,对105名大学生在一周后进行再次施测,总量表与各维度的重测信度系数在0.633~0.859之间;(3)问卷各维度与量表总分的相关系数在0.517~0.878之间,验证性因素分析表明六因素模型拟合良好;(4)人际责任感各维度及总量表与尽责性、宜人性以及共情的3个子维度有正相关,与自我中心的1个子维度有负相关,与社会联结感及亲社会倾向有正相关。结论:中国人人际责任感问卷信度和效度良好,符合心理测量学指标,可在进一步的研究中使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop a interpersonal responsibility measurement tool for contemporary Chinese and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: based on the traditional Chinese culture, based on the literature analysis and open investigation, the theoretical structure of Chinese interpersonal responsibility was preliminarily constructed, and the Chinese interpersonal responsibility questionnaire was compiled according to the concept of structure. A number of tests were carried out in adult samples from many provinces and cities in China, and the measurement indexes were tested. Results 1) the Chinese interpersonal responsibility questionnaire contains six dimensions, namely, respect and care, caring and considerate, helping others, caring and righteousness, not embarrassing damage, reliable and trustworthy. The reliability of internal consistency between the total scale and each dimension was between 0.698 and 0.933. 105 college students were tested again one week later. The correlation coefficient between each dimension and the total score of the scale was between 0.517 and 0.878. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the six-factor model fitted well with each dimension of interpersonal responsibility and the total scale with due diligence. There was a positive correlation between the three subdimensions of amenity and empathy, a negative correlation with one subdimension of self-centeredness, and a positive correlation with the sense of social connection and pro-social tendency. Conclusion: the reliability and validity of Chinese interpersonal responsibility questionnaire are good, which can be used in further research.
【作者单位】：西南大学心理学部;
【基金】：重庆市哲学社会科学规划重大课题委托项目“城市幸福指数研究”(2010CQZDW07)
【分类号】：B841.7

【相似文献】