职业选拔情境下人格测验中作假的认知模式研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 13:03

本文选题：人格测验 + 作假　；参考：《西北大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：通过有效的职业选拔,可以达到良好的人岗匹配,增进社会各方面的效益。人格测验作为一种有效的测评工具,不仅信息丰富,而且操作简单易行,在企业中人才选拔中应用非常广泛。但是在职业选拔中使用的人格测验多为自陈式量表,应聘者回答的真实性受到各方面的质疑。应聘者为了表现出一个有力的自我表征,而故意对人格测验进行歪曲反应的趋势就是作假。虽然,目前大多数的研究表明作假不会显著影响人格测验的预测效度和结构效度,但是作假却改变了应聘者的高端排名,影响录用决策,会导致优秀应聘者的落选。作假对人格测验的负面影响也并没有被完全揭示出来。为了解决这个问题,.研究者们开发了各种工具去识别作假,采用了各种方法去控制作假,反应时识别技术是其中存在争议的一种方法。作假的认知反应过程到底是怎样的,决定了反应时技术的是否有效。本研究通过巧妙的实验设计和高级的统计方法,检验了在我国文化背景下,大学生群体中,三种作假认知模型的适用性以及被试在诚实反应时的反应时分布模型,研究结果表明： (1)在我国文化背景下,被试诚实回答人格测验时,被试的认知反应过程与西方存在差异,被试的反应时分布没有出现“倒U”效应,被试对量表两端选项的反应时与量表中间选项的反应时没有显著差异。 (2)在我国大学生群体中,被试作假的认知模式为改编图式模式。当被试试图表现出一个好的印象或者某种工作需要的人格特质时,被试参照的图式是理想回答者,理想回答者图式是经过加工改编而形成的。 (3)被试的反应时及其分布不能用于侦察或者筛选作假者,研究者们应该转向开发其他的直接测量的工具来识别作假。
[Abstract]:Through effective professional selection, we can achieve a good match between people and posts, and improve the social benefits. As an effective tool, personality test is not only rich in information, but also easy to operate. It is widely used in the selection of talents in enterprises. However, most of the personality tests used in professional selection are self-recorded scale, and the truthfulness of the candidates' answers is questioned by all aspects. In order to show a strong self-representation, the tendency to deliberately distort personality tests is false. Although the majority of current studies show that fraud does not significantly affect the predictive validity and structural validity of personality tests, fraud can change the high ranking of candidates, affect employment decisions, and lead to the failure of good candidates. The negative effects of fraud on personality tests have not been fully revealed. In order to solve the problem. Researchers have developed a variety of tools to identify fraud and adopt a variety of methods to control fraud. Reaction time recognition is one of the controversial methods. The process of false cognitive response determines the effectiveness of the reaction-time technology. Through clever experimental design and advanced statistical methods, this study examined the applicability of three kinds of false cognitive models and the response time distribution model of the participants in the honest reaction under the cultural background of our country. The results show that: (1) under the cultural background of our country, the cognitive reaction process of the subjects was different from that of the West when answering the personality test honestly, and there was no "inverted U" effect in the distribution of the reaction time. There was no significant difference between the reaction time of the two sides of the scale and the reaction time of the middle option of the scale. 2) among the college students in China, the cognitive model of falsehood is the schema adaptation model. When the subjects try to show a good impression or some kind of personality traits required for work, the schemas referred to by the subjects are the ideal responders, and the ideal answers schemata are formed through the processing and adaptation. The participants' response time and their distribution should not be used to detect or screen forgeries, and researchers should turn to developing other direct measurement tools to identify falsehood.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B848

【参考文献】