道德同一性、思维抽象性水平对道德伪善的影响

发布时间：2018-05-16 15:35

本文选题：道德同一性 + 思维抽象性水平　；参考：《宁波大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,随着人们对道德问题的关注度不断提高,道德伪善这一道德现象成为了道德心理研究领域中的热点问题。当前,关于道德伪善的研究也主要是理论探讨和影响因素的相关研究。已有的研究表明,个体因素、情绪、权力等会影响到道德伪善效应。道德同一性和情境因素的思维抽象性水平,作为重要的因素变量,会对道德伪善效应有着重要的影响,但当前鲜有研究涉及。本研究在近年研究的基础上,从道德伪善的行为、“双标准”判断两个层面来考察道德同一性和思维的抽象性水平在道德伪善中的表现和影响。本研究主要从三个部分展开:研究一通过伪善行为实验、模拟情境材料考察作为自我道德核心中的道德同一性与道德伪善的关系和影响。研究二则考察在伪善行为实验和模拟情境材料中思维的抽象性水平对道德伪善的影响,进一步验证和扩展相关研究。研究三则在前两个研究的基础上综合考虑作为个体变量的道德同一性和情境变量的思维抽象性水平是如何影响道德伪善以及变量之间的关系。研究结果发现:(1)低道德同一性被试相比高道德同一性被试在伪善行为实验中产生了更多的伪善行为,有更多的人数选择了绿色任务并且差异显著。道德同一性一定程度上影响了个体的伪善行为。而在模拟情境材料中也发现,不论是作弊情境还是交通违规情境高道德同一性被试对于自己和他人不道德行为接受度的判断分离都小于低道德同一性被试,道德同一性对道德伪善影响明显。(2)启动被试的不同思维抽象性水平发现,抽象思维水平下的被试不论是在伪善行为实验中还是模拟情境材料中的伪善表现都比具体思维水平下的被试表现明显。因此抽象思维水平的启动一定程度上会增加个体的伪善行为和接受度判断的“双标准”分离,从而对道德伪善产生影响。(3)综合道德同一性和思维抽象性水平与道德伪善的关系发现,两者交互影响道德伪善。道德同一性对道德伪善的影响受思维的抽象性水平调节,在低道德同一性个体身上思维水平的调节作用更为明显。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing attention to moral issues, moral hypocrisy has become a hot issue in the field of moral psychology. At present, the research on moral hypocrisy is also a theoretical study and related research of influencing factors. Previous studies have shown that individual factors, emotions, and power influence moral hypocrisy. The level of thinking abstraction of moral identity and situational factors, as important factor variables, will have an important impact on the moral hypocrisy effect. On the basis of recent studies, this study examines the expression and influence of moral identity and the abstract level of thinking in moral hypocrisy from the two aspects of moral hypocrisy and "double criteria". This study is mainly carried out in three parts: first, through hypocritical behavior experiments, the study investigates the relationship and influence between moral identity and moral hypocrisy as the core of self-morality by simulating situational materials. The second study examines the influence of the abstract level of thinking on moral hypocrisy in hypocritical behavior experiments and simulative situational materials, and further validates and expands the relevant research. On the basis of the first two studies, the third study considers how the moral identity of individual variables and the level of thinking abstraction of situational variables affect moral hypocrisy and the relationship between variables. The results showed that the low moral identity subjects had more hypocrisy behavior than the high moral identity subjects, and more people chose the green task and the difference was significant. To some extent, moral identity affects individual hypocrisy. But in the simulation situation material, whether in the cheating situation or the traffic violation situation, the high moral identity subjects were less than the low moral identity subjects in judging the acceptance of their own and others' immoral behavior. The influence of moral identity on moral hypocrisy is obvious. The hypocrisy performance of the subjects in abstract thinking level was more obvious than that in concrete thinking level, either in hypocritical behavior experiment or in simulated situational material. Therefore, to some extent, the initiation of abstract thinking level will increase the individual's hypocrisy behavior and the "double standard" separation of acceptance judgment. Therefore, the relationship between moral identity and the level of abstract thinking and moral hypocrisy can be found that they interact with moral hypocrisy. The influence of moral identity on moral hypocrisy is regulated by the abstract level of thinking.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：B848

【相似文献】