情绪性质与情绪调节策略对知晓感(FOK)的影响研究
发布时间:2018-05-16 20:35
本文选题:知晓感 + 情绪性质 ; 参考:《浙江师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:知晓感判断是元认知监测判断的最为重要、最具代表性的判断之一,也是元认知领域中最早受到研究者关注的分支。对于当前无法准确回忆出来的信息,个体相信该信息储存在记忆中并能在事后通过某种方式将其提取出来的心理体验就是知晓感(feeling-of-knowing,简称FOK),即相信某种信息能从记忆中提取出来,但目前又提取不出来的一种心理状态。正确的知晓感判断对于个体在学习过程中增强自信以及减少时间的浪费具有相当重要的作用,而作为元认知领域的核心概念,影响知晓感判断及其准确性的因素很多,不仅包括学习材料的特点、学习时间及呈现方式等外在的任务变量,还包括知识经验、动机人格等内在的个体因素,其中情绪作为人类与生俱来的一种心理体验对认知及元认知活动产生重要影响。 本研究以揭示个体情绪性质与情绪调节策略对知晓感的影响为实验目的,设计两个实验。实验一为3(情绪性质)×3(情绪词对)的混合设计,考察不同的情绪状态和不同情绪性质的学习材料对被试的知晓感判断及其准确性的影响。实验结果表明:(1)对于FOK判断值而言,情绪性质的主效应和词对性质的主效应显著;(2)回忆成绩上情绪性质主效应显著,对于再认成绩,情绪性质主效应不显著;(3)在FOK判断准确性指标上,情绪性质的主效应显著,中性情绪条件下被试的FOK判断准确性显著好于正性情绪和负性情绪条件。词对性质的主效应显著,中性词对的FOK判断准确性显著好于积极词对和消极词对。 实验二为单因素被试间设计,只诱发被试的负性情绪,以四种不同的情绪调节策略为变量,目的在于考察负性情绪条件下不同的情绪调节策略对知晓感判断及其准确性的影响。研究结果表明:(1)FOK判断等级:评价忽视策略和表情宣泄策略条件下被试的FOK判断值显著高于评价重视和表达抑制组;(2)FOK判断准确性:评价重视和评价忽视两种调节策略下被试的FOK判断准确性显著高于表情宣泄和表情抑制两组。
[Abstract]:Perception judgment is one of the most important and representative judgments in metacognitive monitoring, and it is also the first branch of metacognitive research. The psychological experience that an individual believes that the information is stored in memory and can be extracted in some way after the event is known as "feeling of knowing", or FOKT, is the belief that some information can be extracted from memory. But at present again cannot extract a kind of psychological state. Correct perception judgment plays an important role in enhancing self-confidence and reducing time waste in learning process. As the core concept of metacognition, there are many factors that affect the judgment and accuracy of knowledge perception. Including not only the characteristics of learning materials, learning time and presentation of external task variables, but also the internal individual factors, such as knowledge, experience, motivational personality, etc. Emotion, as an inherent psychological experience of human beings, has an important impact on cognitive and metacognitive activities. Two experiments were designed to reveal the effects of individual emotional properties and emotion regulation strategies on awareness. The first experiment was a mixed design of 3 (emotional properties) 脳 3 (emotional word pairs) to investigate the effects of different emotional states and different emotional properties on the judgment and accuracy of the subjects' perception of knowledge. The experimental results show that for the FOK judgment value, the main effect of emotional nature and the main effect of word on nature are significant. (2) the main effect of emotional nature is significant in recall scores, and in recognition of scores, the main effect of emotional nature is significant. The main effect of emotional nature was not significant (3) on the accuracy index of FOK, the main effect of emotional nature was significant, and the accuracy of FOK was better than that of positive emotion and negative emotion under neutral emotion condition. The FOK judgment accuracy of neutral word pair is better than that of positive word pair and negative word pair. The second experiment was designed for single factor subjects, which only induced negative emotion. Four different emotion regulation strategies were used as variables. The purpose of experiment 2 was to investigate the influence of different emotion regulation strategies on cognition judgment and accuracy under negative emotion condition. The results showed that the FOK judgment value of the subjects under the condition of neglect strategy and facial expression catharsis strategy was significantly higher than that of the evaluation value and expression inhibition group: the evaluation value and the evaluation neglect of the two adjustment strategies were significantly higher than that of the evaluation value and expression inhibition group. The accuracy of FOK was significantly higher than that of emoji catharsis and emoji suppression.
【学位授予单位】:浙江师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李梅;丁艳云;;FOK(知晓感)的研究现状及未来趋势[J];吉林省教育学院学报;2009年02期
2 隋雪;高淑青;王娟;;情绪影响认知实验研究的进展[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
3 陈珏;江雷;;情绪与词对性质对学习判断影响的实证研究[J];教学研究;2012年04期
4 马伟娜;姚雨佳;桑标;;认知重评和表达抑制在无意识层面对情绪反应的调整作用[J];华东师范大学学报(教育科学版);2012年04期
5 刘倩;;情绪调节策略的对比——认知重评优于表达抑制?[J];剑南文学(经典教苑);2013年01期
6 苏俊;;情绪调节和记忆的关系理论模型[J];通化师范学院学报;2011年03期
7 许远理,郭德俊;情绪与认知关系研究发展概况[J];心理科学;2004年01期
8 沈大为,韩凯;FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J];心理学报;2001年04期
9 李静;卢家楣;;不同情绪调节方式对记忆的影响[J];心理学报;2007年06期
10 卢家楣;孙俊才;刘伟;;诱发负性情绪时人际情绪调节与个体情绪调节对前瞻记忆的影响[J];心理学报;2008年12期
,本文编号:1898305
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1898305.html