情绪与情绪调节策略对不同警觉水平运动员时空知觉的影响

发布时间：2018-05-22 10:47

本文选题：运动员 + 情绪　；参考：《北京体育大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：运动员的时空知觉是运动员专门化知觉的核心,因此运动员时空知觉是运动心理学的研究热点。研究表明,情绪和警觉在个体时空知觉过程中起着重要作用。本研究采用实验法,考察不同情绪状态下不同情绪调节策略对不同警觉水平运动员时间知觉和空间知觉的影响,为运动员心理选材和时空知觉训练,提高运动员专门化知觉能力,指导运动员情绪调控等提供科学参考和实证依据。研究包括四个部分:预研究检验注意网络测验在运动员群体中的适用性。选取56名运动员,结果表明:注意系统中警觉、朝向和执行控制三个网络功能之间相关不显著,表明运动员样本与普通人样本特征一致,从而提示注意网络测验在运动员群体中具有良好的适用性。研究一选取16名运动员和19名普通大学生,利用时空知觉研究范式,考察运动员与普通大学生时空知觉的差异。结果发现:(1)运动员比普通大学生时间估计准确性更高,高、低估时间倾向不存在显著差异。(2)运动员比普通大学生空间知觉反应速度更快,空间位置判断准确率不存在显著差异。研究二选取256名运动员,采用时间知觉研究范式,考察不同情绪状态下,不同情绪调节策略对不同警觉水平运动员时间知觉的影响。结果发现:(1)高警觉水平运动员较低警觉水平运动员的时间估计准确性高且倾向于高估时间。(2)低警觉水平运动员在愤怒情绪状态下较快乐情绪状态下倾向于低估时间,时间估计准确性不存在显著差异;高警觉水平运动员在愤怒和快乐情绪状态下的时间知觉不存在显著差异。(3)在不同情绪状态下,不同情绪调节策略对不同警觉水平运动员时间知觉的影响不显著。研究三选取256名运动员,采用空间知觉研究范式,考察不同情绪状态下,不同情绪调节策略对不同警觉水平运动员空间知觉的影响。结果发现:(1)高警觉水平运动员较低警觉水平运动员空间知觉反应速度快,空间位置判断准确率高;在愤怒情绪状态下高警觉水平运动员的空间位置判断准确率较快乐情绪状态下低。(2)在愤怒情绪状态下运动员采用认知重评策略较采用表达抑制策略和控制组运动员的空间反应速度快,空间位置判断准确率不存在显著差异;在快乐情绪状态下采用不同情绪调节策略的空间知觉不存在显著差异。(3)高警觉水平运动员采用认知重评和表达抑制策略较控制组运动员的空间知觉反应速度快,空间位置判断准确率没有显著差异;低警觉水平运动员采用认知重评策略较采用表达抑制策略和控制组运动员的空间知觉反应速度快,空间位置判断准确率没有显著差异。根据实验结果,得出以下结论:(1)注意网络测验在运动员群体中具有良好的适用性。(2)运动员较普通大学生表现出一定的时空知觉反应优势。(3)警觉对运动员时间知觉具有显著影响,警觉水平越高的运动员的时间知觉反应优势越明显;低警觉水平运动员在愤怒情绪状态下更倾向于低估时间。(4)警觉对运动员空间知觉具有显著影响,警觉水平越高的运动员的空间知觉反应优势越明显;高警觉水平运动员的空间位置判断准确率更容易受到情绪的影响;情绪调节策略对不同警觉水平运动员空间知觉的影响存在显著差异,其中在调节愤怒情绪状态下运动员的空间知觉反应速度促进上,认知重评优于表达抑制。
[Abstract]:The temporal and spatial perception of athletes is the core of athletes' specialized perception, so the spatial and temporal perception of athletes is a hot spot in the research of sports psychology. The research shows that emotion and vigilance play an important role in the process of individual time and space perception. The effect of mobilizing time perception and spatial perception can provide scientific reference and empirical basis for athletes' psychological selection and space-time perception training, to improve the athletes' specialized perception ability and to guide the control of athletes' emotion. The study includes four parts: pre research and inspection to check the applicability of network testing in the athletes group. 56 sports are selected. The results showed that attention was noticed in the system, and the correlation between the three network functions of orientation and execution control was not significant, indicating that the sportsman samples were consistent with the characteristics of the ordinary human samples, suggesting that the network test had a good applicability in the athletes' group. One selected 16 athletes and 19 ordinary college students to use temporal and spatial perception. The research paradigm examines the difference between athletes and ordinary college students in time and space perception. The results are as follows: (1) there is no significant difference in time estimation accuracy between athletes and ordinary college students. (2) the speed of spatial perception of athletes is faster than that of ordinary college students, and there is no significant difference in the accuracy rate of spatial location judgment. Two selected 256 athletes, using the time perception research paradigm, to investigate the influence of different emotional adjustment strategies on the time perception of athletes with different alert levels under different emotional states. The results were as follows: (1) high vigilance level athletes were more accurate and inclined to overestimate time. (2) low vigilance level. In the state of anger, the athletes tend to underestimate the time under the happy mood state, and there is no significant difference in the accuracy of time estimation. There is no significant difference in the time perception of the athletes with high alert level in the state of anger and happiness. (3) under different emotional states, different emotion regulation strategies are on different alerting level athletes. The effect of time perception is not significant. In study three, 256 athletes were selected and the spatial perception research paradigm was used to investigate the influence of different emotional adjustment strategies on the spatial perception of athletes with different alertness level under different emotional states. The results were as follows: (1) high alert level athletes had faster spatial perception response speed than low alert level athletes. The accuracy rate of position judgment is high; the accuracy rate of high alert level athletes in the state of anger is lower than that in the happy mood state. (2) in the state of anger, the cognitive reevaluation strategy is faster than the expression inhibition strategy and the control group, and the accuracy of spatial location judgment is not available. There is no significant difference in the spatial perception of the use of different emotional adjustment strategies in the happy mood state. (3) the high alert level athletes use cognitive reassessment and expression inhibition strategies faster than the control group, and there is no significant difference in the accuracy rate of the spatial position judgment; the low alert level athletes take the level. The cognitive reassessment strategy is faster than the expression inhibition strategy and the control group players' spatial perception response speed, and there is no significant difference in the spatial location accuracy. (1) the following conclusions are obtained: (1) attention network test has good adaptability in the athletes group. (2) the athletes show a certain degree than the ordinary college students. (3) vigilance has a significant influence on Athletes' perception of time, the more vigilant athletes have more obvious advantage of time perception reaction; low alert level athletes tend to underestimate time in anger state. (4) vigilance has significant influence on Athletes' space perception, and the higher the level of vigilance athletes The more obvious advantage of the spatial perception reaction; the accuracy rate of the spatial position judgment of the high alert level athletes is more easily influenced by the emotion; the influence of the emotion regulation strategy on the spatial perception of the athletes at different level of alertness is significantly different. Reevaluation is better than expression inhibition.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6

【相似文献】