期限与调节聚焦对期限效果的影响
发布时间:2018-06-08 15:17
本文选题:期限 + 调节聚焦 ; 参考:《首都师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:期限影响着人们生活的方方面面,同样期限对人们的影响也存在着差异。众多的研究发现,自我调节过程与时间观之间存在着相互的影响。本文引入调节聚焦变量,探讨了期限时长、信息框架对期限效果的影响。本文共包括三项研究,研究一探讨特质性调节聚焦对期限效果的影响;研究探讨情境性调节聚焦与期限时长对期限效果影响的交互作用;研究三探讨情境性调节聚焦、结果框架以及整体效价之间的交互效应对期限效果产生的影响。 研究一采用问卷法和实验法,以61名大学生为被试,施测《调节聚焦问卷》,并完成一个即时的谈判任务,同时让被试对期限效果进行预测和后评。对数据进行配对样本t检验分析和独立样本t检验分析,结果显示:调节聚焦对期限效果存在影响,即对高特质防御聚焦被试而言,他们认为期限效果更强;对于高特质促进聚焦被试而言,他们认为期限效果更弱。 研究二采用问卷法和实验法,以276名大学生为被试,采用迷宫任务诱发情境性调节聚焦,并完成一份认知任务试卷,通过倒计时器控制被试完成任务的期限时长,让被试对期限效果进行后评。对数据进行方差分析,结果显示:情境性调节聚焦与期限时长对期限效果的影响具有交互效应。期限越短,防御聚焦被试认为期限效果更强;期限越长,促进聚焦被试认为期限效果更强。 研究三采用问卷法和实验法,以258名大学生为被试,采用迷宫任务诱发情境性调节聚焦,通过指导语控制被试接受的信息框架,并完成一份认知任务试卷,让被试对期限效果进行后评。对数据进行方差分析,结果显示:情景调节聚焦、结果框架和整体效价对期限效果的影响具有匹配效应,即在收益框架和整体正效价的框架条件下,促进聚焦个体认为期限效果最强。 总的来讲,个体预测期限会产生阻碍效果,同时个体对期限效果的后评也是阻碍作用;防御聚焦个体认为期限的阻碍更大,而促进聚焦个体则认为期限的阻碍更小;此外,期限时长会影响期限效果,当期限越短,个体认为期限效果越大,当期限越长,个体认为期限效果越小;情境性调节聚焦与期限时长对期限效果的影响存在交互效应,其中,期限越短,防御聚焦个体认为期限效果更大,期限越长,促进聚焦个体认为期限效果更大;最后,情境性调节聚焦、结果框架、整体效价对期限效果的影响存在交互效应,其中,在收益框架和整体正效价的框架条件下,促进聚焦个体认为期限效果最大。本文从新的视角对期限进行了研究,有助于进一步理解期限与调节聚焦之间复杂的关系,对我们如何看待期限带来的影响具有启发意义。
[Abstract]:Duration affects every aspect of people's life, and the influence of duration on people is also different. Many studies have found that there is a mutual influence between self-regulation process and time view. In this paper, we introduce the variable of adjusting focus, and discuss the influence of duration and information frame on the effect of deadline. This paper consists of three studies, one is to explore the effect of idiosyncratic regulation focusing on deadline effect; the other is to explore the interaction between situational regulation focus and duration effect on deadline effect; third, to explore situational regulation focus. Results the effect of the framework and the interaction between the whole titer on the deadline effect was studied. In the first study, 61 college students were tested by questionnaire and experiment, and a task of immediate negotiation was completed. At the same time, the participants were asked to predict and evaluate the term effect. The data were analyzed by paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test. The results showed that adjusting focus had influence on the duration effect, that is, for high-trait defense focused subjects, they thought that the duration effect was stronger; For the subjects with high trait promoting focus, they thought that the duration effect was weaker. In the second study, 276 college students were tested by questionnaire and experiment, and a cognitive task was completed by using labyrinth task to induce situational adjustment and focus. The duration of the task was controlled by the countdown timer, and the effect of the deadline was evaluated. The results of variance analysis show that the effect of situational adjustment focusing and duration on duration effect is interactive. The shorter the duration, the stronger the duration, and the longer the duration, the stronger the duration. In the third study, 258 college students were selected as subjects. The maze task was used to induce situational adjustment focus, the information frame of the subjects was controlled by the guidance language, and a cognitive task test was completed. The results of variance analysis of the data show that: scenario adjustment focusing, the effect of result framework and overall titer on the effect of maturity has a matching effect, that is, under the framework of income framework and overall positive titer, In general, the individual prediction of the duration will have an obstructing effect, and the individual's post-evaluation of the term effect is also a hindrance; the defensive focus individual thinks that the limitation of the deadline is even greater. In addition, the duration of the term will affect the effect of the term, the shorter the period, the greater the effect of the term, and the longer the duration, the smaller the effect of the term. There are interactive effects between situational adjustment focusing and duration, among which, the shorter the duration, the longer the duration and the longer the duration. Finally, the shorter the duration, the longer the duration. The effect of situational adjustment focusing, result framework and overall titer on the term effect is interactive, among which, under the frame of income frame and overall positive price, the focused individual thinks that the term effect is the most effective. This paper studies the term from a new angle of view, which is helpful to further understand the complex relationship between the duration and the regulating focus, and has enlightening significance to how we view the influence of the deadline.
【学位授予单位】:首都师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李丹;尹华站;李祚山;;时间解释水平理论研究述评[J];重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版);2010年04期
2 朱丽叶;卢泰宏;;调节聚焦原理:动机理论的重大突破[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2010年01期
3 邹开军;试论商务谈判成功的评价标准[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年04期
4 钟毅平;申娟;吴坤;;风险决策任务中时间距离对框架效应的影响[J];心理科学;2009年04期
5 林晖芸;汪玲;;调节性匹配理论述评[J];心理科学进展;2007年05期
6 李雁晨;周庭锐;周t;;解释水平理论:从时间距离到心理距离[J];心理科学进展;2009年04期
7 姚琦;乐国安;;动机理论的新发展:调节定向理论[J];心理科学进展;2009年06期
8 陈瑞君;秦启文;;乐观偏差研究概况[J];心理科学进展;2010年11期
9 王沛;康琳;;任务无关积极情绪与时间限制对大学生风险决策的影响[J];心理学探新;2008年01期
,本文编号:1996244
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1996244.html