平衡—公平的具身关系

发布时间：2018-06-10 05:28

本文选题：具身认知 + 隐喻　；参考：《华中师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：具身认知受到越来越多关注,社会心理学家认为社会关系与个体水平的认知一样都包含了具身方面,这一问题最直接的解释框架是关系模式理论(Smith,2008)。Fiske认为人类有四种基本关系类型：公共共享(CS)、等级排序(AR)、平等匹配(EM)和市场定价(MP),前三种都是具身的,与不同的具身线索存在联系。公平是平等匹配关系的体现,但还没有关于其具身线索的相关实证研究。本文根据前人的研究和理论提出了一核心假设：公平是具身于平衡的。共设计了四个研究对于这一假设进行考察。研究一,采用问卷调查法,考察是否存在平衡—公平图式,结果发现：(1)对于“公平”,个体倾向于选择平衡图案来匹配,而(2)对于“不公平”,个体倾向于选择平衡图案来匹配。也就是说研究一初步证实了平衡—公平图式。研究二,采用情境故事法,进一步验证平衡—公平这一图式。相对于研究一中平衡、不平衡图案的选择,研究二还引入了平衡和公平的不同程度,操控公平的不同程度,考察是否会影响被试对不同平衡程度图案的选择。结果进一步证实了“平衡—公平”图式。研究三,采用经典的启动范式考察了对于平衡的操纵是否会影响公平的判断过程。研究结果表明：(1)在一致性条件下被试反应更快,正确率更高；(2)在不一致性条件,被试反应更慢,正确率越低。也就是说操纵平衡会影响公平判断过程。研究四,通过情景故事法考察操纵平衡是否会影响公平判断结果。结果发现：平衡组和控制组被试在公平判断结果上显著高于不平衡组被试。总之研究证实了操控平衡会影响公平判断结果。
[Abstract]:More and more attention has been paid to physical cognition. Social psychologists believe that social relations and cognition at individual level both contain physical aspects. The most direct explanatory framework of this problem is the relational model theory Smiths2008.Fiske believes that there are four basic types of human relations: public sharing, ranking, equal matching, and market pricing. The first three are all physical, linked to different physical cues. Fairness is the embodiment of equality matching relationship, but there is no relevant empirical research on its clue. Based on previous studies and theories, this paper puts forward a core hypothesis: equity is balanced. Four studies were designed to investigate this hypothesis. First, a questionnaire survey was used to investigate the existence of a balanced and fair schema. The results showed that: 1) for "fairness", individuals tend to choose a balanced pattern to match. For inequity, individuals tend to choose balanced patterns to match. That is to say, study one preliminarily confirms the balance-fair schema. In the second study, we use the situational story method to further verify the balance-fair schema. Compared with the selection of equilibrium and unbalanced patterns in the first middle school, the second study also introduced the different degrees of balance and fairness, the different degree of manipulation of fairness, and examined whether the choice of patterns of different equilibrium degree would be affected by the participants. The results further confirm the "balance-equity" schemas. Third, the classical priming paradigm is used to examine whether the manipulation of equilibrium affects the process of fairness. The results showed that under the consistency condition, the reaction of the subjects was faster and the correct rate was higher. (2) under the condition of inconsistency, the reaction of the subjects was slower and the correct rate was lower. That is to say, the manipulation balance will affect the process of fair judgment. Fourth, the situation story method is used to investigate whether the manipulation balance will affect the result of fair judgment. The results showed that the balance group and the control group were significantly higher than the unbalanced group in the result of fair judgment. All in all, studies have shown that manipulating the balance affects the outcome of fair judgment.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B848

【参考文献】