大学新生孤独感现状及巴林特小组对其孤独感的作用

发布时间：2018-07-01 08:36

本文选题：孤独感 + 大学新生　；参考：《皖南医学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的:调查芜湖市某高校大学新生孤独感现状,研究巴林特小组对于大学新生孤独感水平的改善效果,为探索巴林特小组在其他领域的应用提供依据。方法:采用方便整群随机抽样的方法,运用UCLA孤独感量表调查了600名大学新生孤独感现状。筛选了孤独感量表分数28分的32名大学新生,经知情同意后其中16人入实验组,16人入对照组。实验组开展十次活动巴林特小组团体辅导,对照组开展十次定期交流聚会,并测量实验组与对照组干预前后的结果。结果:大学新生孤独感水平的调查研究结果显示,孤独感水平较高的学生占调查人数的35.50%,孤独感水平一般的占调查人数的56.83%,孤独感水平低或没有孤独感的学生占调查人数的7.67%。经过两独立样本t检验及单因素方差分析各人口学资料对于孤独感水平高低的影响后得出:在单亲(P=0.024)与母亲受教育程度(P=0.032)两个变量上,大学新生孤独感水平差异有统计学意义,其余差异均无统计学意义。巴林特小组干预前,对照组和实验组的各量表分数差异均无统计学意义。实验组经过巴林特小组干预后,以下几个量表前后测得分差异有统计学意义:1.孤独感量表,前测48.06±2.31,后测44.56±2.47,P=0.019;2.安全感量表的人际安全感因子得分,前测25.50±1.10,后测27.50±1.13,P=0.009;3.人际信任量表,前测77.94±2.26,后测79.67±2.12,P=0.027;4.社交回避及苦恼量表的回苦恼分量表得分,前测20.28±0.86,后测21.50±0.05,P=0.033;社交回避及苦恼量表总分,前测41.33±1.45,后测43.11±1.43,P=0.043。结论:1.百分之九十的大学新生中普遍存在孤独感,其中部分大学新生的孤独感水平较高;2.单亲与母亲受教育程度是影响孤独感水平的重要的人口学因素;3.巴林特小组活动可以有效改善大学新生孤独感水平;4.巴林特小组活动能够有效提高大学新生安全感、人际信任感,改善其社交回避状态。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the current situation of loneliness of freshmen in a university in Wuhu city, and to study the effect of Balint group on the improvement of college freshmen's loneliness level, so as to provide the basis for exploring the application of Balint group in other fields. Methods: 600 freshmen were investigated with UCLA loneliness scale by using the convenient cluster random sampling method. Thirty-two freshmen with 28 scores of loneliness scale were selected and 16 of them were enrolled in the experimental group and 16 in the control group after informed consent. The experimental group conducted 10 Balint group counseling activities, the control group conducted 10 regular communication meetings, and the results before and after intervention between the experimental group and the control group were measured. Results: the results of the investigation on the loneliness level of freshmen showed that the students with higher loneliness level accounted for 35.50 percent of the survey population, the average loneliness level accounted for 56.833 percent of the survey population, and the students with low or no loneliness level accounted for 7.67 percent of the survey population. After t test of two independent samples and the effect of demographic data of univariate ANOVA on loneliness level, it was concluded that there was significant difference in loneliness level between single parent (P0. 024) and maternal education (P0. 032). The other differences were not statistically significant. Before Balint intervention, there was no significant difference in scores between the control group and the experimental group. After the intervention of Balint group, there were significant differences in the scores of the following scales before and after the intervention: 1: 1 in the experimental group. The loneliness scale was 48.06 卤2.31 before and 44.56 卤2.47 P0.019 / 2 respectively. The scores of interpersonal security factor in the scale were 25.50 卤1.10 before and 27.50 卤1.13 P0. 009 respectively. Interpersonal trust scale, 77.94 卤2.26, 79.67 卤2.12, 0.027, 4respectively. The scores of social avoidance and distress scale were 20.28 卤0.86, 21.50 卤0.05, 41.33 卤1.45 and 43.11 卤1.43 respectively. Conclusion 1. Loneliness is prevalent in 90% of the freshmen, some of whom have higher levels of loneliness. The educational level of single parent and mother is an important demographic factor affecting loneliness level. Balint group activities can effectively improve college freshmen's loneliness level. Balint group activities can improve college freshmen's sense of security, interpersonal trust and social avoidance.
【学位授予单位】：皖南医学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6

【参考文献】