疾病威胁在内团体贬低形成中的作用初探
发布时间：2018-08-26 09:54
【摘要】：目的： 探讨个体疾病易感程度和外在疾病线索与内团体贬低水平之间的关系,对疾病威胁在内团体贬低形成过程中所起的作用进行初步研究。 研究方法： 采用最小团体范式对被试的分组进行操作,而后完成偏好选择任务,具体为： 实验1：采用最小团体范式对被试身份进行分组,之后两组被试完成对目标身份即人脸面孔的偏好选择任务和自身对疾病易感程度的量表,以探讨个体疾病易感程度与内团体贬低水平之间的关系。 实验2：采用最小团体范式对被试身份进行分组,之后两组被试在不同环境下完成对目标身份的偏好选择任务,以探讨外在疾病线索与内团体贬低水平之间的关系。 结果： 实验1：目标身份主效应显著,F(1,58)=4.44,p0.05,η2=0.07(内团体：M=3.82,SD=1.18；外团体：M=4.17,SD=1.12)。被试身份主效应不显著,F(1,58)=0.32,p0.05,η2=0.006。两者的交互作用不显著,F(1,58)=0.001,p0.05,η2=0.000。PVD量表总分与被试的内团体贬低的程度相关极显著,r=0.33,p0.01；因子1是对疾病感染性的感知,它与被试的内团体贬低的程度相关极显著,r=0.39,p0.01；因子2是细菌厌恶,它与被试的内团体贬低的程度相关极显著,r=0.39,p0.01。 实验2：被试身份的主效应不显著,F(1,76)=2.81,p0.05,η2=0.04。疾病线索的主效应极显著,F(1,76)=7.31,p0.01,η2=0.09。疾病环境条件下的被试的内团体贬低程度(M=0.79,SD=0.69)大于控制环境下的被试的内团体贬低程度(M=0.79,SD=0.69)。两者交互作用不显著,F(1,76)=1.23,p0.05,η2=0.02。 结论： 1、当个体对自身感染疾病的担忧程度越大时,内团体贬低现象越明显。 2、当个体处于一个容易感染疾病的环境中时,内团体贬低现象越明显。 3、内团体贬低与内团成员带来过高的疾病威胁水平有关。疾病威胁在内团体贬低的形成中起到了一定的作用,存在疾病威胁时,内团体贬低现象越明显。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between individual disease susceptibility, external disease cues and internal group denigration, and to study the role of disease threat in the process of degrade formation. Methods: using the minimal group paradigm to operate the participants' groups, and then completing the preference selection task. Experiment 1: using the minimum group paradigm to group the participants' identity. Then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity i.e. face and the scale of their susceptibility to disease to explore the relationship between the degree of individual disease susceptibility and the level of internal group denigration. Experiment 2: the participants were divided into two groups using the minimal group paradigm, and then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity in different environments to explore the relationship between the external disease cues and the level of internal group degrade. Results: in experiment 1, the main effect of target identity was significant: F (1: 58) (4.44, p 0.05, 畏 _ (2) 0.07 (inner group: M = 3.82, SD1. 18; external group: 1. 17, SD1. 12). Results: the main effect of target identity was significant (F (1 / 58) P = 4.44, p = 0.05, 畏 _ 2 = 0.07). The main effect of identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 58) P _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) 0.006). The interaction between the two was not significant. The total score of 畏 2=0.000.PVD scale was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 1 was a perception of disease infection, and it was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 2 was bacterial disgust, and factor 2 was bacterial disgust. It was significantly correlated with the degree of deprecation of the inner-group in the subjects. Experiment 2: the main effect of subjects' identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) ~ (2.81) p _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) = 0.04). The main effect of disease cues is extremely significant: F _ (1 / 76) ~ (7.31) p _ (0.01), 畏 _ 2 ~ (0.09). The degree of inner-group debasement (M0. 79) was higher than that in control environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69) under the condition of disease environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69), and that in control environment was 0. 69% (M0. 79% SD0. 69). The interaction between the two was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) 1.23 (p 0.05) and 畏 _ (2) (0.02). Conclusion: 1, when the individual is more worried about the disease of his own infection, the phenomenon of internal group debasement is more obvious. 2. When the individual is in an environment prone to infection with the disease, The more obvious the phenomenon of inner-group debasement. 3, the inner-group denigration is related to the high level of disease threat brought by the inner group members. The formation of the disease threat plays a certain role in the formation of the deprecation of the group, and when there is the disease threat, the phenomenon of the internal group denigration is more obvious.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B848;R395
本文编号：2204496
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between individual disease susceptibility, external disease cues and internal group denigration, and to study the role of disease threat in the process of degrade formation. Methods: using the minimal group paradigm to operate the participants' groups, and then completing the preference selection task. Experiment 1: using the minimum group paradigm to group the participants' identity. Then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity i.e. face and the scale of their susceptibility to disease to explore the relationship between the degree of individual disease susceptibility and the level of internal group denigration. Experiment 2: the participants were divided into two groups using the minimal group paradigm, and then the two groups completed the task of preference selection of the target identity in different environments to explore the relationship between the external disease cues and the level of internal group degrade. Results: in experiment 1, the main effect of target identity was significant: F (1: 58) (4.44, p 0.05, 畏 _ (2) 0.07 (inner group: M = 3.82, SD1. 18; external group: 1. 17, SD1. 12). Results: the main effect of target identity was significant (F (1 / 58) P = 4.44, p = 0.05, 畏 _ 2 = 0.07). The main effect of identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 58) P _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) 0.006). The interaction between the two was not significant. The total score of 畏 2=0.000.PVD scale was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 1 was a perception of disease infection, and it was significantly correlated with the degree of debasement of the inner-group in the subjects. Factor 2 was bacterial disgust, and factor 2 was bacterial disgust. It was significantly correlated with the degree of deprecation of the inner-group in the subjects. Experiment 2: the main effect of subjects' identity was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) ~ (2.81) p _ (0.05), 畏 _ (2) = 0.04). The main effect of disease cues is extremely significant: F _ (1 / 76) ~ (7.31) p _ (0.01), 畏 _ 2 ~ (0.09). The degree of inner-group debasement (M0. 79) was higher than that in control environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69) under the condition of disease environment (M0. 79% SDT 0. 69), and that in control environment was 0. 69% (M0. 79% SD0. 69). The interaction between the two was not significant (F _ (1 / 76) 1.23 (p 0.05) and 畏 _ (2) (0.02). Conclusion: 1, when the individual is more worried about the disease of his own infection, the phenomenon of internal group debasement is more obvious. 2. When the individual is in an environment prone to infection with the disease, The more obvious the phenomenon of inner-group debasement. 3, the inner-group denigration is related to the high level of disease threat brought by the inner group members. The formation of the disease threat plays a certain role in the formation of the deprecation of the group, and when there is the disease threat, the phenomenon of the internal group denigration is more obvious.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B848;R395
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吴宝沛;张雷;;疾病的心理防御:人类如何应对病菌威胁[J];心理科学进展;2011年03期
，本文编号：2204496
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2204496.html
