类别归纳中具体与一般结论任务的ERP特征比较
发布时间：2018-09-06 09:17
【摘要】：研究采用事件相关电位技术(ERPs),比较了具体结论类别归纳推理(例如,前提条件:苹果X1,推论结论条件:梨子X1?,即梨子是否也具有属性X1)与一般结论类别归纳推理(例如,前提条件:苹果X1,推论结论条件:水果X1?,即水果是否也具有属性X1)的ERP特征差异.实验结果显示:与基线条件相比(例如,前提条件:苹果X1,推论结论条件:苹果X1?),具体和一般条件诱发了更大的P2,反映了具体与一般结论增加的汉字正字法的表征分析过程;同时具体和一般结论条件比基线条件诱发了更大的N2成分,反映了知觉匹配.另外,具体结论条件比一般结论条件诱发了更小的P3b成分,反映了具体结论条件比一般结论条件需要更多的工作记忆或有更低水平的推理预期满意程度.最后,具体结论条件比一般结论条件诱发了更大的N400成分,表明具体结论条件比一般结论条件需要更多的认知努力整合信息.这些发现表明,在类别归纳推理中,具体结论与一般结论条件在ERP特征上是存在差异的.
[Abstract]:In this study, event-related potential (ERPs),) technique was used to compare the inductive inference of specific conclusions (for example, apple X 1, inference conclusion condition: pear X1, whether pear also has attribute X1) with general conclusion inductive reasoning (for example, conclusion X1). Precondition: Apple X1, corollary condition: fruit X1, that is, whether the fruit also has the attribute X1, the difference of ERP characteristics. The experimental results showed that compared with the baseline conditions (for example, the precondition: Apple X1, the corollary condition: Apple X1?), the specific and general conditions induced a larger P2s, which reflected the process of characterizing and analyzing the orthography of Chinese characters with the increase of specific and general conclusions. At the same time, the specific and general conditions induce a larger N _ 2 component than baseline conditions, reflecting perceptual matching. In addition, the specific conclusion condition induces a smaller P3b component than the general conclusion condition, which reflects that the concrete conclusion condition requires more working memory than the general conclusion condition or has a lower level of expected satisfaction. Finally, the conclusion condition induces a larger N400 component than the general conclusion condition, which indicates that the concrete conclusion condition requires more cognitive effort to integrate information than the general conclusion condition. These findings indicate that there are differences in ERP characteristics between specific conclusions and general conclusion conditions in category inductive reasoning.
【作者单位】： 重庆市教育评估院;西南大学心理学部;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(31200780)
【分类号】：B842
，
本文编号：2225889
[Abstract]:In this study, event-related potential (ERPs),) technique was used to compare the inductive inference of specific conclusions (for example, apple X 1, inference conclusion condition: pear X1, whether pear also has attribute X1) with general conclusion inductive reasoning (for example, conclusion X1). Precondition: Apple X1, corollary condition: fruit X1, that is, whether the fruit also has the attribute X1, the difference of ERP characteristics. The experimental results showed that compared with the baseline conditions (for example, the precondition: Apple X1, the corollary condition: Apple X1?), the specific and general conditions induced a larger P2s, which reflected the process of characterizing and analyzing the orthography of Chinese characters with the increase of specific and general conclusions. At the same time, the specific and general conditions induce a larger N _ 2 component than baseline conditions, reflecting perceptual matching. In addition, the specific conclusion condition induces a smaller P3b component than the general conclusion condition, which reflects that the concrete conclusion condition requires more working memory than the general conclusion condition or has a lower level of expected satisfaction. Finally, the conclusion condition induces a larger N400 component than the general conclusion condition, which indicates that the concrete conclusion condition requires more cognitive effort to integrate information than the general conclusion condition. These findings indicate that there are differences in ERP characteristics between specific conclusions and general conclusion conditions in category inductive reasoning.
【作者单位】： 重庆市教育评估院;西南大学心理学部;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(31200780)
【分类号】：B842
，
本文编号：2225889
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2225889.html
