动作—语词联结水平对操作学习的影响
发布时间：2018-09-10 07:31
【摘要】：操作效应的加工机制是近年来被人们关注却依然存在很多疑问的一个研究领域。在以往的研究中，人们分别从信息的输入、编码独立性、情景整合等多角度提出了不同的理论假设，但都不能很好的解释操作学习条件下产生的某些记忆特性。有的理论在关注动作编码的独立性时忽略了联结的作用，有的则在强调整合时完全否定独立编码的可能性。本文结合以往研究结论，试图从联结视角出发，剖析现有理论所存争议之处，并进一步探讨操作效应的加工机制。 本研究包含两个实验，实验一旨在探讨动作-语词联结性对操作效应的影响；实验二则进一步探讨造成该影响的原因，即动作-语词联结性如何作用于操作学习的加工机制。 实验一，采取2学习条件(语词学习VT vs.操作学习SPT)×2材料类型(动作-语词联结性好vs.联结性差)被试间设计。通过对比语词条件和操作条件下学习动作-语词联结水平不同的材料时的记忆表现，，研究该联结水平对操作效应的影响。实验一结果表明，在操作学习条件下，对动作-语词联结性好的材料的记忆成绩显著好于对动作-语词联结性差的材料的记忆成绩。同时，在学习动作-语词联结性差的材料时，操作学习并不会带来操作效应。 实验二，采取2材料类型(动作-语词联结性好vs.联结性差)×3提取方式(动作提取vs.语词提取vs.动作语词一起提取)混合设计。通过对比操作学习动作-语词联结水平不同的材料，在提取不同信息时的表现，研究动作-语词联结性如何作用于操作学习的加工机制。实验二结果表明，在操作条件下学习动作-语词联结性好的材料时，对各信息的记忆成绩无差异；在操作条件下学习动作-语词联结性差的材料时，对语词信息的记忆成绩显著好于对动作和语词信息同时记忆的成绩。 研究证实了本文的理论假设，即操作学习中动作-语词信息之间较好的联结是产生操作效应的关键，忽略联结性是导致以往理论存在争议的主要原因。文章最后从联结视角出发，提出操作效应加工机制理论假设：不同记忆系统之间的共同作用是导致操作效应产生的原因。
[Abstract]:The processing mechanism of operation effect is a research field which has been paid more attention to in recent years but still has many questions. In previous studies, different theoretical hypotheses have been put forward from the perspectives of information input, coding independence, scenario integration, etc., but none of them can explain some memory characteristics under operational learning conditions. Some theories ignore the role of association while paying attention to the independence of action coding, while others completely negate the possibility of independent coding while emphasizing integration. Based on the previous research conclusions, this paper attempts to analyze the controversy existing in the existing theories from the angle of connection, and to further explore the processing mechanism of the operational effect. The present study consists of two experiments, one is to explore the effect of action-word connectedness on the operational effect, and the other is to explore the causes of this effect, that is, how action-word connectedness affects the processing mechanism of operational learning. Experiment 1, take 2 learning conditions (word learning VT vs.) Operational Learning SPT) 脳 2 material Type (Action-word Connectivity good vs. Poor connectivity) design between the subjects. By comparing the memory performance of learning materials with different levels of active-word association under the conditions of words and operations, the influence of the level of association on the operational effect was studied. The results of experiment 1 show that under the condition of operational learning, the results of memory of the materials with good connectedness of action words are significantly better than those of materials with poor connectedness of action words. At the same time, operational learning does not bring operational effect when learning action-word connectedness. Experiment two, take 2 material types (Action-word Connectivity good vs.) Poor connectedness) 脳 3 extraction (action extraction vs.) Word extraction vs. Action words are extracted together) mixed design. By comparing the materials with different levels of action-word association in operational learning, this paper studies how the connectedness of action-words affects the processing mechanism of operational learning when extracting different information. The results of experiment 2 show that there is no difference in the memory performance of each information when learning the materials with good connectedness of action words and words under the operation condition, and when learning the materials with poor connectedness of action words and words under the operation conditions, The result of memory of word information is better than that of simultaneous memory of action and word information. The research confirms the theoretical hypothesis that the better connection between action and word information in operational learning is the key to the operation effect, and neglecting connectedness is the main reason for the controversy in previous theories. Finally, from the angle of connection, the paper puts forward the hypothesis of operation effect processing mechanism: the common action among different memory systems is the cause of operation effect.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842
本文编号：2233790
[Abstract]:The processing mechanism of operation effect is a research field which has been paid more attention to in recent years but still has many questions. In previous studies, different theoretical hypotheses have been put forward from the perspectives of information input, coding independence, scenario integration, etc., but none of them can explain some memory characteristics under operational learning conditions. Some theories ignore the role of association while paying attention to the independence of action coding, while others completely negate the possibility of independent coding while emphasizing integration. Based on the previous research conclusions, this paper attempts to analyze the controversy existing in the existing theories from the angle of connection, and to further explore the processing mechanism of the operational effect. The present study consists of two experiments, one is to explore the effect of action-word connectedness on the operational effect, and the other is to explore the causes of this effect, that is, how action-word connectedness affects the processing mechanism of operational learning. Experiment 1, take 2 learning conditions (word learning VT vs.) Operational Learning SPT) 脳 2 material Type (Action-word Connectivity good vs. Poor connectivity) design between the subjects. By comparing the memory performance of learning materials with different levels of active-word association under the conditions of words and operations, the influence of the level of association on the operational effect was studied. The results of experiment 1 show that under the condition of operational learning, the results of memory of the materials with good connectedness of action words are significantly better than those of materials with poor connectedness of action words. At the same time, operational learning does not bring operational effect when learning action-word connectedness. Experiment two, take 2 material types (Action-word Connectivity good vs.) Poor connectedness) 脳 3 extraction (action extraction vs.) Word extraction vs. Action words are extracted together) mixed design. By comparing the materials with different levels of action-word association in operational learning, this paper studies how the connectedness of action-words affects the processing mechanism of operational learning when extracting different information. The results of experiment 2 show that there is no difference in the memory performance of each information when learning the materials with good connectedness of action words and words under the operation condition, and when learning the materials with poor connectedness of action words and words under the operation conditions, The result of memory of word information is better than that of simultaneous memory of action and word information. The research confirms the theoretical hypothesis that the better connection between action and word information in operational learning is the key to the operation effect, and neglecting connectedness is the main reason for the controversy in previous theories. Finally, from the angle of connection, the paper puts forward the hypothesis of operation effect processing mechanism: the common action among different memory systems is the cause of operation effect.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 余晓婷;贺荟中;;国内手语研究综述[J];中国特殊教育;2009年04期
2 李俊宏;丁国盛;;手语和口语理解及产生的脑机制对比[J];心理科学进展;2013年09期
本文编号：2233790
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2233790.html
