不同距离条件下视觉反应的差异性研究
[Abstract]:In daily life, all animals, led by human beings, will feel all kinds of information from outside, so as to grasp the situation of the outside world, in order to seek advantages and avoid harm. Eighty percent of the information we get comes from the visual channel. Vision is extremely important for human survival. In the study, the individual is used as the research center, and the vision is divided into close vision (the range within the arm centered by the individual) and long distance vision (the visual range outside the arm of the individual). The study found that for two different distances of vision, they are regulated and controlled by different subsystems of the brain. This study is supported by relevant theories and further logical reasoning verification of the leading guidance: 1. Weiss et al believe that the dorsal flow of the brain is involved in the processing of information when the healthy subjects participate in or complete the tasks related to close-vision, while the ventral flow activates greatly when the subjects complete the tasks related to long-range vision. According to Previc's theory, the dorsal flow mainly receives the information from the large cell pathway, which is only sensitive to the information related to brightness, and the ventral flow mainly receives the information from the small cell pathway. This cell pathway plays a role in both brightness changes and color perception. In experiment 1, the white solid dots were used as the target detection task of the subjects, and the subjects were asked to stare closely at the focus points of the center, and click the mouse in time to find out the actual positions in the 32 preset positions around them. Participants were asked to react at close range and long distance (projection screen presentation) at different visual distances. This experiment attempts to detect whether there are differences in the responses of the subjects to the stimuli presented at different distances. The results showed that the response scores of the subjects at close range were better than those of the subjects. This shows that the participants' perception of non-color stimuli is superior (significant level) at close range. Experiment 2 in this study further expands the experiment, using green solid dots as the target detection task of the subjects. The experimental conditions and procedures are similar to that of experiment 1. This paper attempts to test whether the differences in performance between different distances of non-color stimuli can be extended to color stimuli, that is, whether the participants' performance of different distances is different in terms of the perception of the target of color stimulus. The results showed that the performance of the subjects in the close-range condition was much lower than that in the same task at a long distance, and there were also differences in the response scores of the subjects to different experimental stimuli. In the third experiment, the solid spot color of the target is changed to the same color as the background color but the brightness is higher. The experiment tries to explore whether there is still a visual difference reaction at different distances when only the luminance activates the corresponding visual nerve. The results showed that the response score of the subjects to the close-range task was better than that of the long-distance task, and different from the first experiment, the different position of the experimental stimulus also resulted in the difference of the subjects' reaction. Combined with the experimental results of this study, we can see that the human brain for different distances of visual processing is really controlled and regulated by different subsystems, and expanded the existing research, the field of vision has been more accurately divided. It supports the theoretical hypothesis of Weiss et al effectively from the level of behavior experiment.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:B842.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁春阳;IRT:理论与应用[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2001年04期
2 赵向阳,朱滢;互联网——心理学研究的新工具[J];心理科学进展;2002年03期
3 徐英平;外语测试类别之理论探讨[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2004年02期
4 时丽娟;;好的人格测验应考虑的几个问题[J];文教资料;2006年09期
5 蒋玉兰;;从英语阅读考试结果看几个普遍的阅读问题[J];社科纵横(新理论版);2009年04期
6 袁登伟;李德高;;词汇联想及其可操纵性[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2010年10期
7 蒙晓虹;;客观语言测试的优点与局限及对英语各级考试的指导意义[J];上海工程技术大学教育研究;2004年03期
8 张丽红;;非英语专业学生听力焦虑调查研究[J];语文学刊(外语教育与教学);2009年10期
9 刘晓华;郝兴昌;;错误记忆的影响因素[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2011年03期
10 刘小菠;;“主试”与“被试”——马尔克斯《巨翅老人》叙事结构分析[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 上海之通人事测评技术研究所 孙黎明;评价中心的评价形式(一)[N];组织人事报;2002年
2 姜东、张利民;难以拦截:SS-25[N];解放军报;2001年
3 特约主持人 朱琦 实习记者 陈丹凤;人才测评打通人才的瓶颈[N];组织人事报;2002年
4 黄艾禾;科学家:哪些该做,,哪些不该做[N];中华读书报;2002年
5 ;马老师信箱:奇妙的人际知觉效应[N];中国教育报;2002年
6 冯美榕;企业 你进行人才测评了吗[N];光明日报;2002年
7 广西南宁市第五人民医院 王翔南;请正确认识测谎仪[N];健康报;2001年
8 张结海;2002年度诺贝尔经济学奖[N];社会科学报;2002年
9 魏勤;吸烟对人心理的危害[N];中国消费者报;2001年
10 曹谦;天天见硝烟[N];中国质量报;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王睿青;记忆生存加工优势的问题研究[D];西北大学;2014年
2 郑伟;自我相关信息对冲突任务加工的影响[D];西南大学;2014年
3 王熠姝;暴力电子游戏对大学生攻击性和情绪的影响[D];华中师范大学;2014年
4 白璐;5-6岁儿童数字估计能力的干预研究[D];首都师范大学;2014年
5 张潇;不同距离条件下视觉反应的差异性研究[D];西南大学;2014年
6 罗骏章;信任违背对自我—他人重叠的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
7 蒋光玉;维族与汉族的情绪差异:文化、性别和注意的作用[D];西南大学;2014年
8 胡丹;不同冲突水平下手臂动作对延迟选择的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
9 石锋;共情与内隐攻击性的关系研究[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
10 魏文庆;基于EEG的BCI的研究与设计[D];浙江大学;2007年
本文编号:2285481
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2285481.html