基于CQT原理的行为筛查测验研究:认知负荷与情境因素、人格特质的关系

发布时间：2018-11-22 08:38

【摘要】：目的探究行为筛查测验中情境因素对认知负荷的影响,并分析真实测试情境下认知负荷与人格特质的关系,为提高现场测试精确度提供依据。方法试验a为实验室试验(laboratory test),无情境创设,被试为30名本科生,以反应时为认知负荷指标。现场试验(field test,即试验b)以新一期心理健康调查工作为依托,被试为某单位已通过前期录用选拔的886名职员,并以反应时作为认知负荷指标,分析筛查测验认知负荷与人格特质的关系。结果不同测试情境下行为筛查测验的认知负荷存在差异。试验a中不同题目类别的认知负荷并无差异,但在试验b中不同题目类别的认知负荷存在差异。调查题目(V2和V3)的认知负荷较高。焦虑个性倾向的在无关题目(V1)和调查题目(V2)上反应时长较长,而个性严谨的被试认真严谨,对待测试认真,卷入程度较高,在调查题目(V2和V3)的反应时长较长。同时自我欺骗因子得分较高的被试,行为筛查测验认知负荷较低。结论情境因素影响行为筛查测验的认知负荷,人格特质与认知负荷有关。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the effect of situational factors on cognitive load in behavioral screening test and analyze the relationship between cognitive load and personality traits in real testing situations so as to provide a basis for improving the accuracy of field testing. Methods experiment a was created for laboratory test (laboratory test), without situation, and 30 undergraduates were enrolled in the experiment. The cognitive load index was reaction time. The field test (field test, (test b) was based on the new phase of mental health investigation. The subjects were 886 employees who had passed the early stage of recruitment in a certain unit, and the response time was taken as the cognitive load index. To analyze the relationship between cognitive load and personality trait of screening test. Results the cognitive load of behavioral screening test was different in different test situations. There is no difference in cognitive load among different subject categories in experiment a, but there are differences in cognitive load among different subject categories in experiment b. The subjects (V 2 and V 3) had higher cognitive load. The reaction time of anxiety personality tendency was longer on irrelevant questions (V1) and investigation questions (V2), while the subjects with strict personality were serious and serious, and involved in higher degree of involvement. The reaction time of the subjects (V2 and V3) was longer than that of the subjects under investigation (V2 and V3). At the same time, the subjects with higher score of self-deception had lower cognitive load. Conclusion situational factors affect cognitive load of behavioral screening test and personality traits are related to cognitive load.
【作者单位】：第四军医大学航空航天医学系;中国航天员科研训练中心;
【基金】：十二五重大课题(AWS12J003)
【分类号】：B848

【相似文献】