挫折感对科学创造力、文学创造力的影响
发布时间：2018-11-28 18:34
【摘要】：情绪和创造力的关系一直受到广泛关注,但是目前相关研究仍充满矛盾结果和未解问题。大多数研究认为正性情绪有利于创造力,也有一些研究支持负性情绪有利于创造力。这种矛盾结果可能是由于情绪在不同领域的创造活动中扮演不同的角色。挫折感是一种常见又对个体具有重要影响的负性情绪。挫折感的反应理论中的挫折--攻击假说和挫折--倒退理论认为挫折感会带来破坏性或回避性的行为,而非建设性的创造行为,挫折--效应理论则认为挫折感会产生高效和创造性的行为。具体到挫折感和创造活动的关系上,有研究认为只有安定的社会环境和正性情绪才有利于科学创造活动,而中国的经典文学命题“穷而后工”认为作为负性情绪的挫折感对文学创造力可能具有促进作用。情绪和创造力关系的理论、挫折感反应理论,挫折感和创作活动关系的理论这三个层次的理论观点暗示着挫折感对科学仓创造力和文学创造力的影响是不一样的。为了研究挫折感对科学创造力、文学创造力的作用,以及这个作用是否受创造力倾向和心理弹性这两个个体特征的影响。本研究采用威廉姆斯创造力倾向量表和Connor-Davidson韧性量表中文版测量了被试的创造力倾向和心理弹性。并将被试分成创造力倾向和心理弹性没有差异的两组,一组作为实验组,一组作为对照组。以“综合认知能力测验”为材料,人为干预测验中的负性反馈来诱发实验组被试的挫折感,利用青少年科学创造力测验测量被试的科学创造力,利用微小说创作任务测量被试的文学创造力。结果表明挫折感诱发任务成功了诱发了实验组被试的挫折感。实验分组和创造力类型的主效应不显著,实验分组和创造力类型的交互作用显著。进一步的简单效应分析表明。在科学创造力任务上,挫折组的表现低于对照组,此外实验分组和创造力倾向的交互作用以及实验分组和心理弹性的交互作用都不显著;在文学创造力任务上,挫折组的表现好于对照组,此外实验分组和创造力倾向的交互作用以及实验分组和心理弹性的交互作用都不显著。在挫折组内部,文学创造力的表现好于科学创造力;而在对照组内部,文学创造力的表现低于科学创造力。研究证明挫折感促进了文学创造力,抑制了科学创造力,这种作用是稳定的,受创造力倾向、心理弹性等个体特征影响较小。挫折感可能是通过提高创造的动机来提高文学创造力的,而挫折感对科学创造力的抑制则是因为注意的广度减小了。
[Abstract]:The relationship between emotion and creativity has been widely concerned, but the related research is still full of contradictory results and unsolved problems. Most studies suggest that positive emotions are good for creativity, while others support negative ones. The paradox may be that emotions play different roles in creative activities in different fields. Frustration is a common negative emotion that has an important impact on individuals. Frustration in the reaction Theory of frustration-aggression hypothesis and frustration Frustration-effect theory suggests that frustration produces efficient and creative behavior. When it comes to the relationship between frustration and creative activities, studies have shown that only a stable social environment and positive emotions are conducive to scientific creative activity. However, the classical Chinese literary proposition "poor and backward" holds that frustration, as a negative emotion, may promote literary creativity. The theory of the relationship between emotion and creativity, the theory of frustration response, the theory of the relationship between frustration and creative activity suggest that the impact of frustration on creativity in science warehouse is different from that in literature. In order to study the effect of frustration on scientific creativity, literary creativity, and whether this role is affected by the two individual characteristics of creativity tendency and psychological elasticity. In this study, the Chinese version of Williams creativity disposition scale and Connor-Davidson resilience scale were used to measure the creativity propensity and mental resilience of the subjects. The subjects were divided into two groups: one as experimental group and one as control group. Taking the Comprehensive Cognitive ability Test as the material, the negative feedback in the artificial intervention test was used to induce the frustration of the subjects in the experimental group, and the scientific creativity of the subjects was measured by the Youth Scientific creativity Test. To measure the literary creativity of the subjects by using the task of micro-fiction creation. The results showed that the task of inducing frustration successfully induced the frustration of the experimental group. The main effect of experiment group and creativity type is not significant, and the interaction between experiment group and creativity type is significant. Further simple effect analysis shows that. In the task of scientific creativity, the performance of frustration group was lower than that of control group, in addition, the interaction between experimental group and creativity tendency and the interaction between experimental group and psychological elasticity were not significant. In the task of literary creativity, the frustration group performed better than the control group, in addition, the interaction between the experimental group and the creativity tendency and the interaction between the experimental group and the psychological elasticity were not significant. In the frustration group, the performance of literary creativity was better than that of scientific creativity, while in the control group, the performance of literary creativity was lower than that of scientific creativity. It has been proved that frustration promotes literary creativity and inhibits scientific creativity, which is stable and less influenced by individual characteristics such as creativity tendency, psychological elasticity and so on. Frustration may increase literary creativity by increasing creative motivation, while frustration inhibits scientific creativity because the breadth of attention is reduced.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
本文编号：2363887
[Abstract]:The relationship between emotion and creativity has been widely concerned, but the related research is still full of contradictory results and unsolved problems. Most studies suggest that positive emotions are good for creativity, while others support negative ones. The paradox may be that emotions play different roles in creative activities in different fields. Frustration is a common negative emotion that has an important impact on individuals. Frustration in the reaction Theory of frustration-aggression hypothesis and frustration Frustration-effect theory suggests that frustration produces efficient and creative behavior. When it comes to the relationship between frustration and creative activities, studies have shown that only a stable social environment and positive emotions are conducive to scientific creative activity. However, the classical Chinese literary proposition "poor and backward" holds that frustration, as a negative emotion, may promote literary creativity. The theory of the relationship between emotion and creativity, the theory of frustration response, the theory of the relationship between frustration and creative activity suggest that the impact of frustration on creativity in science warehouse is different from that in literature. In order to study the effect of frustration on scientific creativity, literary creativity, and whether this role is affected by the two individual characteristics of creativity tendency and psychological elasticity. In this study, the Chinese version of Williams creativity disposition scale and Connor-Davidson resilience scale were used to measure the creativity propensity and mental resilience of the subjects. The subjects were divided into two groups: one as experimental group and one as control group. Taking the Comprehensive Cognitive ability Test as the material, the negative feedback in the artificial intervention test was used to induce the frustration of the subjects in the experimental group, and the scientific creativity of the subjects was measured by the Youth Scientific creativity Test. To measure the literary creativity of the subjects by using the task of micro-fiction creation. The results showed that the task of inducing frustration successfully induced the frustration of the experimental group. The main effect of experiment group and creativity type is not significant, and the interaction between experiment group and creativity type is significant. Further simple effect analysis shows that. In the task of scientific creativity, the performance of frustration group was lower than that of control group, in addition, the interaction between experimental group and creativity tendency and the interaction between experimental group and psychological elasticity were not significant. In the task of literary creativity, the frustration group performed better than the control group, in addition, the interaction between the experimental group and the creativity tendency and the interaction between the experimental group and the psychological elasticity were not significant. In the frustration group, the performance of literary creativity was better than that of scientific creativity, while in the control group, the performance of literary creativity was lower than that of scientific creativity. It has been proved that frustration promotes literary creativity and inhibits scientific creativity, which is stable and less influenced by individual characteristics such as creativity tendency, psychological elasticity and so on. Frustration may increase literary creativity by increasing creative motivation, while frustration inhibits scientific creativity because the breadth of attention is reduced.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘晓陵;刘路;邱燕霞;金瑜;周隽;;威廉斯创造力测验的信效度检验[J];基础教育;2016年03期
2 张文娟;常保瑞;钟年;张春妹;;文化与创造力:基于4P模型的探析[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2016年02期
3 李吉品;刘秀丽;;基于创造力内隐理论的艺术创造力结构研究[J];延边大学学报(社会科学版);2015年04期
4 王玉龙;姚明;易明,;;不同心理弹性个体在挫折情境下的注意偏向——积极音乐的作用[J];中国心理卫生杂志;2015年06期
5 李吉品;刘秀丽;;艺术创造力评估研究现状及发展趋势[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年03期
6 王玉龙;钟振;;挫折情境对不同心理弹性个体内隐攻击性的启动[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2015年02期
7 袁加锦;丁南翔;刘莹莹;杨洁敏;;无意识接受策略在挫折情景下的情绪调节效应:行为与生理证据[J];中国科学:生命科学;2015年01期
8 胡卫平;韩葵葵;;青少年科学创造力的理论研究与实践探索[J];心理发展与教育;2015年01期
9 李良敏;罗玲玲;刘武;;客观化创造力测量工具:《中文远距联想测验》编制[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2015年01期
10 王玉龙;姚明;邹淼;;不同心理弹性青少年在挫折情境下的认知特点[J];心理研究;2013年06期
，本文编号：2363887
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2363887.html
