快速阅读者与慢速阅读者的副中央凹预视效益的眼动研究
发布时间：2018-12-17 03:28
【摘要】：随着科技的发展,社会的进步,现代人的生活节奏日益加快,人们的联系越来越紧密,信息沟通次数越来越多,越来越顺畅,导致信息量以惊人的速度增长着,在每天面对浩如烟海的信息资料中,快速的寻找到自己所需要的那一部分信息,对现代人来说非常的重要。近百年来,研究者对读者阅读过程的研究始终保持着高热度,但对于快速阅读的研究较少,国内关于快速阅读的研究大部分也仅仅在中小学生快速阅读训练上,对快速阅读的心理机制的研究少之又少。本文利用眼动分析法进行研究,通过副中央凹预视实验来考察快速阅读者和慢速阅读者的预视效益。首先采用区分预实验来筛选出快速阅读者和慢速阅读者,筛选的方式为纸笔阅读速度测验(使用e-prime 2.0呈现),纸笔阅读速度测验采用自编150个常识性实验句子,读者一眼就能判断句子的正误(与常识相同的如:"一个星期有七天";明显与常识相悖的如:"体重仪可以测量人的身高"),让被试在三分钟的时间内判断这些句子,依据被试在规定时间内判断的句子数量排序,取前10%的被试作为快速阅读者,取后10%的被试作为慢速阅读者。两者之间阅读句子数量的差异显著(p0.00)。副中央凹预视效益实验采用2阅读速度(快速阅读者和慢速阅读者)×2预视条件(一致预视和假词预视)×2中央凹负荷(高频词和低频词)的混合实验设计,其中不同阅读速度的读者是组间设计,不同预视条件和不同中央凹负荷是组内设计。使用EyeLink 1000来记录被试的眼动轨迹,通过变化中央凹词频(高、低)来操纵中央凹负荷(低、高),同时操纵了副中央凹预视条件(一致和假词),采用边界范式,利用中央凹负荷来考察快速阅读者和慢速阅读者的副中央凹预视效益。综合以上实验结果,得出以下结论:(1)慢速阅读者的副中央凹预视效益大于快速阅读者,说明读者在阅读过程中信息的加工是平行加工,所以慢速阅读有更充分的时间加工副中央凹的预视信息。(2)本研究支持了 SWIFT平行加工理论。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology and the progress of society, the pace of life of modern people is accelerating day by day, people's contact is getting closer and closer, the times of information communication is more and more, more and more smooth, resulting in the amount of information increasing at an astonishing speed. It is very important for modern people to find the part of information they need quickly in the face of the vast amount of information. In the past hundred years, the research on the reader's reading process has always maintained a high degree of heat, but the research on the fast reading is less, and most of the domestic research on the fast reading is only on the fast reading training of the primary and middle school students. There is little research on the psychological mechanism of fast reading. In this paper, eye movement analysis is used to study the previewing effect of fast readers and slow readers through the paracentric fovea previewing experiment. First of all, the paper and pen reading speed test (presented with e-prime 2.0) was used to screen fast readers and slow readers, and 150 common sense experimental sentences were used to test the reading speed of paper and pen. The reader can judge the correct and wrong sentences at a glance (as in common sense: "there are seven days a week"; Obviously contrary to common sense, such as "the weight meter can measure the height of a person"), the subjects were asked to judge the sentences in three minutes, according to the number of sentences judged within the specified time. The top 10% of the subjects were regarded as fast readers, and 10% of the latter were slow readers. There was a significant difference in the number of sentences read between the two groups (p0.00). The paracentric fovea previewing effect experiment was designed with 2 reading speed (fast reader and slow reader) 脳 2 previewing condition (uniform preview and false word preview) 脳 2 central fovea load (high frequency word and low frequency word). The readers of different reading speed are intergroup design, different previewing conditions and different central concave load are intra-group design. EyeLink 1000 was used to record the eye movement track of the subjects. The central concave load (low and high) was manipulated by changing the word frequency of the central fovea (high and low), and the paracentric fovea previewing conditions (consistent and false words) were manipulated at the same time, and the boundary paradigm was used. The central fovea load is used to study the pre-viewing efficiency of fast and slow readers. Based on the above experimental results, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) the sub-central fovea previewing efficiency of slow readers is greater than that of fast readers, which indicates that the information processing of readers is parallel processing in the process of reading. Therefore, slow reading has more sufficient preset information of subcentral concave processing. (2) this study supports SWIFT parallel processing theory.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
本文编号：2383575
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology and the progress of society, the pace of life of modern people is accelerating day by day, people's contact is getting closer and closer, the times of information communication is more and more, more and more smooth, resulting in the amount of information increasing at an astonishing speed. It is very important for modern people to find the part of information they need quickly in the face of the vast amount of information. In the past hundred years, the research on the reader's reading process has always maintained a high degree of heat, but the research on the fast reading is less, and most of the domestic research on the fast reading is only on the fast reading training of the primary and middle school students. There is little research on the psychological mechanism of fast reading. In this paper, eye movement analysis is used to study the previewing effect of fast readers and slow readers through the paracentric fovea previewing experiment. First of all, the paper and pen reading speed test (presented with e-prime 2.0) was used to screen fast readers and slow readers, and 150 common sense experimental sentences were used to test the reading speed of paper and pen. The reader can judge the correct and wrong sentences at a glance (as in common sense: "there are seven days a week"; Obviously contrary to common sense, such as "the weight meter can measure the height of a person"), the subjects were asked to judge the sentences in three minutes, according to the number of sentences judged within the specified time. The top 10% of the subjects were regarded as fast readers, and 10% of the latter were slow readers. There was a significant difference in the number of sentences read between the two groups (p0.00). The paracentric fovea previewing effect experiment was designed with 2 reading speed (fast reader and slow reader) 脳 2 previewing condition (uniform preview and false word preview) 脳 2 central fovea load (high frequency word and low frequency word). The readers of different reading speed are intergroup design, different previewing conditions and different central concave load are intra-group design. EyeLink 1000 was used to record the eye movement track of the subjects. The central concave load (low and high) was manipulated by changing the word frequency of the central fovea (high and low), and the paracentric fovea previewing conditions (consistent and false words) were manipulated at the same time, and the boundary paradigm was used. The central fovea load is used to study the pre-viewing efficiency of fast and slow readers. Based on the above experimental results, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) the sub-central fovea previewing efficiency of slow readers is greater than that of fast readers, which indicates that the information processing of readers is parallel processing in the process of reading. Therefore, slow reading has more sufficient preset information of subcentral concave processing. (2) this study supports SWIFT parallel processing theory.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 白学军;王永胜;郭志英;高晓雷;闫国利;;汉语阅读中词N+2的预视对高频词N+1加工影响的眼动研究[J];心理学报;2015年02期
2 胡笑羽;方平;白学军;;语义相关性对副中央凹一中央凹效应的影响[J];心理科学;2013年02期
3 胡笑羽;方平;叶理丛;;副中央凹-中央凹效应的发展研究[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版);2013年01期
4 马国杰;李兴珊;;阅读中的注意分配:序列与平行之争[J];心理科学进展;2012年11期
5 贺春英;;大学生快速阅读能力的培养——一项基于视听快速阅读教材的实证研究[J];外语电化教学;2012年05期
6 张茂林;杜晓新;;阅读预期对不同阅读策略特点聋人大学生快速阅读影响的眼动研究[J];中国特殊教育;2012年03期
7 刘妮娜;王娟;闫国利;;快速阅读训练对小学生阅读效果影响的实验研究[J];天津师范大学学报(基础教育版);2012年01期
8 白学军;刘娟;臧传丽;张慢慢;郭晓峰;闫国利;;中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应[J];心理科学进展;2011年12期
9 闫国利;王丽红;巫金根;白学军;;不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究[J];心理学报;2011年03期
10 韦璞;隋雪;;副中央凹研究及其范式[J];吉林省教育学院学报;2011年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张慢慢;中文阅读中词跳读机制的眼动研究[D];天津师范大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 曹璐;情绪影响初中生说明文快速阅读的实验研究[D];山西大学;2007年
，本文编号：2383575
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2383575.html
