神经质水平对负性情绪面孔所致注意瞬脱的影响研究

发布时间：2019-01-20 20:12

【摘要】：目的:本研究使用RSVP范式,分别以T1和T2为负性面孔,考察高低神经质个体对负性面孔在时间维度上的注意瞬脱是否有不同。对象:利用艾森克人格量表施测并对E因素进行匹配控制后的被试30人,依据其神经质得分将被试分为高、低神经质两组。方法:实验一采用RSVP双任务范式,探讨当T1是不同情绪类型时,高、低神经质组被试的的注意瞬脱特点。实验二采用RSVP双任务范式,探讨T2是不同情绪类型时,在缺乏注意资源的条件下,高、低神经质组被试对情绪刺激的有意捕获。结果:实验一发现,对T1任务统计分析中,情绪主效应显著,F(1,28)=41.25,p0.01,表明负性情绪阻碍被试对性别识别。对T2任务统计分析中,情绪主效应显著,F(1,28)=43.25,p0.01,表明相比中性面孔,负性面孔为T1造成T2更难识别。高低神经质组主效应显著,F(l,28)=6.11,p0.05,表明高神经质对T2正确率显著低于低神经质。三阶交互作用显著,F(1,28)=8.03,p0.01,进一步分析发现:对高神经质,T1为负性面孔时被试对T2正确反应率无论是在短延迟或长延迟,都明显比中性面孔时低(p0.01)。实验二发现,情绪主效应显著,F(1,27)=24.17,p0.01,表明相比中性面孔,T2为负性面孔时,被试注意瞬脱对抗效应显著。高低神经质组主效应显著,F(1,27)=5.13,p0.05,表明高神经质对T2反应正确率显著低于低神经质。结论:1、高神经质被试对T2识别正确率整体上低于低神经质被试。T1负性情绪面孔明显增加了高低神经质被试的注意瞬脱效应。2、高神经质被试对负性信息的解脱困难是其产生注意瞬脱的内在机制。T2负性情绪面孔使高低神经质被试出现了明显的注意瞬脱对抗效应。
[Abstract]:Aim: in this study, we used RSVP paradigm, T1 and T2 as negative faces, respectively, to investigate whether there were differences in the time dimension of attention blink between high and low neurotic individuals to negative faces. Participants: thirty subjects who were tested by Eysenck Personality scale and controlled by E factor were divided into two groups according to their neuroticism score: high and low neuroticism. Methods: in experiment 1, RSVP double task paradigm was used to explore the characteristics of attention transient in high and low neuroticism groups when T1 was different emotion type. In experiment 2, we used the RSVP double task paradigm to explore the intentional capture of emotional stimulation in the high and low neuroticism groups under the condition of lack of attention resources when T2 was different emotion type. Results: in the statistical analysis of T1 tasks, the main effect of emotion was significantly (, F (_ (1 / 28) = 41.25 (p ~ (0.01), which indicated that negative emotion hindered the subjects' gender recognition. In the statistical analysis of T 2 tasks, the main emotional effect was significantly, F (1 (28) = 43.25 (p 0.01), which indicated that the negative faces of T 1 were more difficult to recognize than those of neutral faces. The main effect of high and low neuroticism group was significantly, F (ln28) = 6.11p 0.05, which indicated that the correct rate of high neuroticism to T2 was significantly lower than that of hyponeuroticism. The third order interaction was significant, F (1m28) = 8.03% p0.01. Further analysis showed that the correct response rate to T2 was no matter in short delay or long delay, when T 1 was a negative face for high neuroticism. Both were significantly lower than neutral faces (p0.01). The second experiment found that the main effect of emotion was significantly, F (_ (1 ~ (27) = 24.17p _ (0.01), which indicated that when T _ 2 was a negative face, the antagonistic effect of instant deactivation was significant when T _ 2 was a negative face. The main effect of high and low neuroticism group was significantly, F (1 / 27) = 5.13 (p = 0.05), which indicated that the correct rate of response of high neuroticism to T2 was significantly lower than that of low neuroticism. Conclusion: 1. The accuracy rate of T 2 recognition in high neurotic subjects was lower than that in low neurotic subjects. T1 negative emotional faces significantly increased the attention instant effect of high and low neurotic subjects. The difficulty of releasing negative information from hyperneurotic subjects is the intrinsic mechanism of the transient attention, and T2 negative emotional faces make the high and low neurotic subjects have obvious antagonistic effect of instant attention.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.3

【相似文献】