权威人格、权力感对道德思维方式的影响
发布时间：2019-03-02 18:04
【摘要】：权威人格又称为权力主义人格,它是由一组相互关联的人格特征组成的人格类型。本研究把权力感定义为权力被激发或唤醒的心理状态。最近,研究者开始关注权威人格与权力感的社会影响。随着对权力感和道德思维研究的深入,一些学者开始关注权力感与道德思维方式的关系,发现在不同的权力感条件下,被试会有不同的道德思维方式。本研究以贵州某高校大学生为被试,通过在不同条件下对权力的操作来启动被试的高权力感和低权力感,探讨不同条件下的权力感被外部刺激唤起以后,个体权力感对道德思维的影响,以及在不同的条件下权威人格对道德思维方式的影响。通过四个实验获得如下结论: 1.被试做为非当事人的条件下,不同权威主义分数的被试在不同的道德思维方式的选择上没有显著的差异;高权力感的被试更倾向于规则为导向的道德思维方式,低权力感的被试更倾向于结果为导向的道德思维方式。 2.被试做为当事人的条件下,不同权威主义分数的被试在不同的道德思维方式的选择上没有显著的差异;高权力感的被试和低权力感的被试都更倾向于结果为导向的道德思维方式。 3.被试做为当事人且道德判断关系到其他人的生命的条件下,不同权威主义分数的被试在不同的道德思维方式的选择上没有显著的差异;高权力感的被试更倾向于规则为导向的道德思维方式,低权力感的被试更倾向于结果为导向的道德思维方式。 4.被试做为当事人且道德判断关系自己利益的条件下,不同权威主义分数的被试在不同的道德思维方式的选择上没有显著的差异;高权力感和低权力感的被试都更倾向于结果为导向的道德思维方式。
[Abstract]:Authoritative personality, also called authoritarian personality, is a type of personality composed of a group of interrelated personality characteristics. In this study, the sense of power is defined as the psychological state in which power is stimulated or awakened. Recently, researchers began to focus on the social impact of authoritative personality and sense of power. With the deepening of the research on the sense of power and moral thinking, some scholars began to pay attention to the relationship between the sense of power and the mode of moral thinking, and found that under different conditions of the sense of power, the subjects would have different ways of moral thinking. In this study, a college student in Guizhou province was taken as the subject. Through the operation of power under different conditions, the subjects' sense of high power and low power was initiated, and then the sense of power under different conditions was aroused by external stimuli. The influence of individual sense of power on moral thinking, and the influence of authoritative personality on moral thinking mode under different conditions. The following conclusions were obtained through four experiments: 1. The subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral ways of thinking under the condition that they were non-parties. The subjects with high power sense were more inclined to rule-oriented moral thinking mode, and those with low power sense tended to result-oriented moral thinking mode. 2. The subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral ways of thinking under the condition of being a party. Both high-power and low-power subjects tend to result-oriented moral thinking. 3. Under the condition that subjects are parties and moral judgment is related to the lives of others, there is no significant difference in the choice of different moral thinking modes among subjects with different authoritarianism scores. The subjects with high power sense were more inclined to rule-oriented moral thinking mode, and those with low power sense tended to result-oriented moral thinking mode. 4. Under the condition that subjects were parties and moral judgment related to their own interests, the subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral thinking modes; Both high-power and low-power subjects tended to result-oriented moral thinking.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B848
本文编号：2433322
[Abstract]:Authoritative personality, also called authoritarian personality, is a type of personality composed of a group of interrelated personality characteristics. In this study, the sense of power is defined as the psychological state in which power is stimulated or awakened. Recently, researchers began to focus on the social impact of authoritative personality and sense of power. With the deepening of the research on the sense of power and moral thinking, some scholars began to pay attention to the relationship between the sense of power and the mode of moral thinking, and found that under different conditions of the sense of power, the subjects would have different ways of moral thinking. In this study, a college student in Guizhou province was taken as the subject. Through the operation of power under different conditions, the subjects' sense of high power and low power was initiated, and then the sense of power under different conditions was aroused by external stimuli. The influence of individual sense of power on moral thinking, and the influence of authoritative personality on moral thinking mode under different conditions. The following conclusions were obtained through four experiments: 1. The subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral ways of thinking under the condition that they were non-parties. The subjects with high power sense were more inclined to rule-oriented moral thinking mode, and those with low power sense tended to result-oriented moral thinking mode. 2. The subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral ways of thinking under the condition of being a party. Both high-power and low-power subjects tend to result-oriented moral thinking. 3. Under the condition that subjects are parties and moral judgment is related to the lives of others, there is no significant difference in the choice of different moral thinking modes among subjects with different authoritarianism scores. The subjects with high power sense were more inclined to rule-oriented moral thinking mode, and those with low power sense tended to result-oriented moral thinking mode. 4. Under the condition that subjects were parties and moral judgment related to their own interests, the subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral thinking modes; Both high-power and low-power subjects tended to result-oriented moral thinking.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B848
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 仲兵;刘爱芳;;对我国公务员权威人格的调查分析——以江苏部分公务员为例[J];理论前沿;2009年24期
2 邓善凤;;权威主义人格研究的流觞[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2013年04期
3 许文娟;;权力感对大学生道德思维方式的影响[J];社会心理科学;2013年04期
4 李小平;杨晟宇;李梦遥;;权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响[J];心理学报;2012年07期
5 韦庆旺;俞国良;;权力的社会认知研究述评[J];心理科学进展;2009年06期
6 孙英;权利义务新探[J];中国人民大学学报;1996年01期
7 段锦云;黄彩云;;个人权力感对进谏行为的影响机制:权力认知的视角[J];心理学报;2013年02期
8 郑睦凡;赵俊华;;权力如何影响道德判断行为:情境卷入的效应[J];心理学报;2013年11期
，本文编号：2433322
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2433322.html
