不同动机趋近积极情绪对危机决策质量的影响

发布时间：2019-03-05 10:49

【摘要】：早期对情绪的研究大都以效价为依据将情绪分为积极情绪和消极情绪。近年来对趋近动机情绪理论等具体情绪理论研究的兴起,拓展了情绪研究的范围,丰富了情绪与决策之间的研究。尽管如此,对于情绪对危机决策的作用方面的研究较多从理论方向加以论证,更鲜有研究者在具体情绪方面进行实证研究。本研究借鉴前人对危机决策质量的测量指标的定义,对不同趋近动机的积极情绪下个体面对紧急的突发事件做出的决策质量是否有差异进行了探索性的研究。实验一是单因素被试间实验设计,诱发被试渴望情绪、平静情绪以及中性条件后,要求被试完成危机决策任务材料；实验二中加入解释责任变量,作为一种社会情境对个体的决策起着重要的作用的因素,考查其对危机决策质量的影响,采用3(情绪：渴望、平静、中性条件)x2(解释责任：有、无)的被试间实验设计,要求被试完成危机决策的任务材料。实验一和实验二的结果发现：(1)平静情绪使得个体在危机情境下所做决策的时间短于渴望情绪下和中性条件下的个体；有解释责任使得个体做决策所用的时间比没有解释责任要高。(2)平静情绪下个体对自己所做的危机决策的自信度和满意度都比渴望情绪和中性条件下个体的要高。(3)有解释责任时,平静情绪下个体受解释责任的影响最小；无解释责任时,情绪对个体自身自信度、满意度的影响显著,而有解释责任下情绪对个体自身自信度及满意度的影响不显著。(4)平静情绪下个体所做危机决策的质量最好,解释责任减弱了情绪对危机决策质量的影响。
[Abstract]:Most of the early studies on emotion classified emotion into positive emotion and negative emotion on the basis of potency. In recent years, the rise of specific emotional theories, such as the theory of approaching motivation and emotion, has expanded the scope of emotional research and enriched the study of the relationship between emotion and decision-making. In spite of this, the research on the role of emotion in crisis decision-making is mostly proved from the theoretical direction, and few researchers do empirical research on the specific emotion. Based on the previous definition of the quality of crisis decision-making, this study explores whether there is a difference in the decision-making quality of individuals in the face of emergency emergencies under the positive emotions of different approaching motivations, which is based on the definition of the quality of decision-making of crisis decision-making. The first experiment was designed to induce desire, calm and neutral conditions, and then the participants were asked to complete the crisis decision-making task materials. In experiment 2, the explanatory responsibility variable was added as an important factor of social situation to individual decision-making, and the influence of it on the quality of decision-making in crisis was examined, using 3 (emotion: desire, calm, and so on). Neutral condition) x2 (interpretive responsibility: yes, none) inter-test design requires participants to complete the task material for crisis decision-making. The results of experiment 1 and experiment 2 show that: (1) calm emotion makes the decision-making time shorter in crisis situation than in desire mood and neutral condition; The responsibility to explain causes individuals to spend more time making decisions than they do not. (2) the confidence and satisfaction of individuals in calmness with the crisis decisions they make are higher than those in desire and neutral conditions. To be high. (3) when there is a duty to explain, Under the calm mood, the individual is the least affected by the responsibility of explanation; The influence of emotion on self-confidence and satisfaction is significant when there is no explanation responsibility. (4) the quality of crisis decision-making under calm mood is the best, but the influence of emotion on self-confidence and satisfaction is not significant under the responsibility of explanation. (4) the quality of crisis decision-making is the best under calm emotion. The responsibility to explain weakens the emotional impact on the quality of crisis decision-making.
【学位授予单位】：宁夏大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.6

【参考文献】