关系密切程度以及思维方式和决策风格对风险偏好的影响

发布时间：2019-03-09 17:26

【摘要】：研究目的:探讨救援决策者与被救援者的关系密切程度以及思维方式与决策风格对风险偏好的影响。研究方法:实验一采用3(关系密切程度:高、中、低)×2(思维方式:直觉性、分析性)两因素混合实验设计,被试68名;实验二采用3(关系密切程度:高、中、低)×2(思维方式:直觉性、分析性)×2(决策风格:直觉型、分析型)三因素混合实验设计,被试93名。研究结果:(1)救援决策者与被救援者的关系密切程度越高,风险偏好越高;(2)直觉性和分析性思维方式之间的风险偏好无显著差异;(3)直觉型决策风格的风险偏好显著高于分析型;(4)关系密切程度与思维方式的交互作用显著,具体而言,采用直觉性思维方式时,关系密切程度的效应显著,关系密切程度越高,风险偏好越高;采用分析性思维方式时,关系密切程度的效应不显著。结论:直觉与风险偏好的关系更密切。面对关系亲密的被救援者,决策者采用直觉性思维方式时的风险偏好较高。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between the rescue decision maker and the rescued person and the influence of thinking mode and decision style on risk preference. Methods: in the first experiment, 68 subjects were tested with 3 (close degree: high, middle, low) 脳 2 (mode of thinking: intuitive, analytical) two-factor mixed experiment design; The second experiment was designed with 3 (close degree: high, middle, low) 脳 2 (mode of thinking: intuitive, analytical) 脳 2 (decision-making style: intuitive, analytical) three-factor mixed experimental design, 93 subjects. The results are as follows: (1) the higher the relationship between the rescue decision maker and the rescued person, the higher the risk preference; (2) there is no significant difference in risk preference between intuitive and analytical modes of thinking; (3) the risk preference of intuitive decision-making style was significantly higher than that of analytical decision-making style; (4) the interaction between the degree of closeness and the mode of thinking is significant, specifically, the effect of the degree of closeness is significant when adopting the intuitive mode of thinking, and the higher the degree of closeness is, the higher the risk preference is; When the analytical mode of thinking is adopted, the effect of the degree of close relationship is not significant. Conclusion: intuition is more closely related to risk preference. Decision makers have a higher risk preference when they adopt intuitive thinking mode when faced with the rescuers who are close to each other.
【作者单位】：清华大学心理学系;清华大学深圳研究生院;
【基金】：清华大学自主科研计划课题(2010THZ04)
【分类号】：B842

【参考文献】