情绪和情绪调节对大学生道德判断的影响
发布时间：2019-04-21 19:43
【摘要】：道德判断是道德心理学研究中一个永恒领域。传统的道德判断研究认为认知在道德判断中起重要甚至是唯一的作用,但近年来越来越多的道心理学家主张情绪对道德判断的作用不容忽视。Haidt等人认为道德由伤害／关爱、互惠／公平、内群体、等级／权威和神圣／纯洁五个不同的领域组成,各个领域均有进化的根源、对应的情境和相应的情绪,伤害／关爱领域对应同情、憎恶情绪,互惠／公平领域对应愤怒、内疚等情绪,神圣／纯洁对应厌恶等情绪。 本研究以是非观、价值观处在初步成熟阶段的大学生群体为对象,进行了两个实验。实验一采用电影片段诱发被试产生愤怒、厌恶情绪,考查这两种情绪对大学生伤害／关爱、互惠／公平和神圣／纯洁三个领域道德判断的影响。实验二在实验一的基础上,引发被试产生愤怒、厌恶情绪的同时用指导语引导被试采用评价忽视或表情抑制的情绪调节方式,进一步探讨情绪调节对大学生三个道德领域的道德判断的影响。结果发现： (1)愤怒情绪对伤害／关爱领域道德判断有影响,对互惠／公平领域道德判断无影响。厌恶情绪对神圣／纯洁领域道德判断有影响。 (2)表情抑制情绪调节方式使愤怒、厌恶情绪感受显著提高,表情抑制情绪调节方式使愤、厌恶情绪感受显著降低。 (3)采用表情抑制方式比采用评价忽视方式调节愤怒情绪后,被试对伤害／关爱领域道德美德行为判断更加宽容,对道德违背行为判断更加严厉；采用表情抑制方式比采用评价忽视方式调节厌恶情绪后,被试对神圣／纯洁领域道德美德行为判断更加宽容,对道德违背行为判断更加严厉。两种情绪调节方式对愤怒、厌恶情绪调节之后,被试在互惠／公平领域道德判断上无显著性差异。
[Abstract]:Moral judgment is an eternal field in the study of moral psychology. Traditional studies on moral judgment suggest that cognition plays an important or even unique role in moral judgment. However, in recent years, more and more Taoist psychologists argue that the role of emotion in moral judgment should not be ignored. Haidt and others believe that morality is caused by injury / care. Reciprocity / equity, inner group, hierarchy / authority and sanctity / purity, each of which has its roots in evolution, corresponding situations and corresponding emotions, injury / care in response to compassion and abomination, Reciprocity / fairness corresponds to anger, guilt, etc, and sacred / pure to aversion. In this study, two experiments were conducted on college students with non-view and values in the initial mature stage. In the first experiment, anger and aversion were induced by movie clips, and the effects of these two emotions on moral judgment of college students in three fields: injury / care, reciprocity / fairness and sanctity / purity were examined. In the second experiment, on the basis of experiment one, the subjects were induced to produce anger and disgust, and at the same time, the subjects were guided by guidance to use the emotion regulation mode of evaluation neglect or expression inhibition. The influence of emotional adjustment on moral judgment of college students in three moral fields was further discussed. The results showed that: (1) anger had influence on moral judgment in injury / care field, but not on reciprocal / fair field. Aversion has an impact on moral judgment in the holy / pure realm. (2) the expression inhibition emotion regulation mode makes the anger, the aversion emotion feeling increases, the expression suppresses the emotion regulation mode causes the indignation, the aversion emotion feeling reduces obviously. (3) the subjects were more tolerant of moral virtue behavior judgment and harsher to moral violation behavior judgment in injury / care field after using expression inhibition method than using evaluation and neglect method to regulate anger emotion; The subjects were more tolerant of moral virtue behavior in sacred / pure domain and harsher to moral violation behavior after adjusting aversion by expression inhibition than by evaluation and neglect. After regulating anger and aversion, there was no significant difference in moral judgment in the field of reciprocity / fairness between the two types of emotion regulation.
【学位授予单位】：湖北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.6
本文编号：2462501
[Abstract]:Moral judgment is an eternal field in the study of moral psychology. Traditional studies on moral judgment suggest that cognition plays an important or even unique role in moral judgment. However, in recent years, more and more Taoist psychologists argue that the role of emotion in moral judgment should not be ignored. Haidt and others believe that morality is caused by injury / care. Reciprocity / equity, inner group, hierarchy / authority and sanctity / purity, each of which has its roots in evolution, corresponding situations and corresponding emotions, injury / care in response to compassion and abomination, Reciprocity / fairness corresponds to anger, guilt, etc, and sacred / pure to aversion. In this study, two experiments were conducted on college students with non-view and values in the initial mature stage. In the first experiment, anger and aversion were induced by movie clips, and the effects of these two emotions on moral judgment of college students in three fields: injury / care, reciprocity / fairness and sanctity / purity were examined. In the second experiment, on the basis of experiment one, the subjects were induced to produce anger and disgust, and at the same time, the subjects were guided by guidance to use the emotion regulation mode of evaluation neglect or expression inhibition. The influence of emotional adjustment on moral judgment of college students in three moral fields was further discussed. The results showed that: (1) anger had influence on moral judgment in injury / care field, but not on reciprocal / fair field. Aversion has an impact on moral judgment in the holy / pure realm. (2) the expression inhibition emotion regulation mode makes the anger, the aversion emotion feeling increases, the expression suppresses the emotion regulation mode causes the indignation, the aversion emotion feeling reduces obviously. (3) the subjects were more tolerant of moral virtue behavior judgment and harsher to moral violation behavior judgment in injury / care field after using expression inhibition method than using evaluation and neglect method to regulate anger emotion; The subjects were more tolerant of moral virtue behavior in sacred / pure domain and harsher to moral violation behavior after adjusting aversion by expression inhibition than by evaluation and neglect. After regulating anger and aversion, there was no significant difference in moral judgment in the field of reciprocity / fairness between the two types of emotion regulation.
【学位授予单位】：湖北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李芳;朱昭红;白学军;;高兴和悲伤电影片段诱发情绪的有效性和时间进程[J];心理与行为研究;2009年01期
2 何冬锦;;情绪诱发技术及其应用[J];福建论坛(社科教育版);2008年S1期
3 陈瑞芳;郑莉君;;社会人格取向的成人依恋与情感调节[J];宁波大学学报(教育科学版);2006年06期
4 曾祥岚;崔淼;;情绪调节的过程、策略及其作用[J];宁夏社会科学;2010年02期
5 朱艳新;顾虹;;情绪调节及其相关概念辨析[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年05期
6 王敏;郭文斌;;我国近十年情绪调节研究热点知识图谱[J];心理研究;2011年05期
7 陈建兵;黄富峰;;论道德判断[J];齐鲁学刊;2006年03期
8 董会芹;;情绪调节与个体依恋策略的形成机制[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年01期
9 谭文娇;王志艳;孟维杰;;道德情绪研究十年:回顾与展望[J];心理研究;2012年06期
10 乔建中,饶虹;国外儿童情绪调节研究的现状[J];心理发展与教育;2000年02期
，本文编号：2462501
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2462501.html
