负性情绪对动作速度的影响研究
发布时间：2019-04-26 13:04
【摘要】：竞技比赛是一个动态的发展过程,往往伴随着多种情绪的变化。我们常常看到运动员因为发挥失常而导致比赛的失败,这与运动员当时的情绪状态有着很大的关系,尤其是负性情绪状态。另外,动作速度在整个竞技比赛领域占有非常重要的地位,许多竞技项目获胜的关键是对动作速度的有效调控。因此,探讨负性情绪对动作速度的影响将有助于指导运动员在赛场上有效的调控动作速度,取得最终的胜利。本研究将情绪诱发与提示目标任务范式相结合,从行为和ERP特征两个方面,探讨了负性情绪对动作速度的影响。实验一初步探讨负性情绪对动作速度影响的行为特征。要求被试观看情绪图片(不同效价情绪图片以伪随机方式呈现,保证相同效价的图片最多连续呈现两张),之后在目标刺激的提示下快速完成六次按键动作任务,记录被试完成第一次和第六次动作任务的时间。两因素(情绪效价×按键次序)重复测量方差分析结果表明,情绪效价间主效应不显著(p=0.087),按键次序间主效应显著(p=0.014),两因素交互作用不显著(p=0.271)。实验二着重探讨负性情绪对动作速度影响的行为特征和ERP特征。要求被试观看情绪图片(中性和负性情绪图片整组呈现),之后在目标刺激的提示下快速完成六次按键动作任务,记录第一次和第六次完成动作任务的时间并采集ERP数据。将不同情绪效价组按图片呈现先后顺序分为早中晚三个时期,并分别对三个时期的行为和ERP数据进行统计分析。行为数据结果如下:(1)早期情绪效价间主效应不显著(p=0.103),按键次序间主效应显著(p=0.001),两因素交互作用不显著(p=0.963)。(2)中期情绪效价间主效应不显著(p=0.146),按键次序间主效应显著(p=0.039),两因素交互作用不显著(p=0.469)。(3)晚期情绪效价间主效应显著(p=0.042),负性情绪条件下的动作速度要显著慢于中性条件的动作速度;按键次序间主效应显著(p=0.002);两因素交互作用不显著(p=0.643)。对晚期ERP数据进行两因素重复测量方差分析结果如下:(1)N1波幅:情绪效价间主效应不显著(P=0.350);按键次序间主效显著(P=0.043),第六次按键诱发出更大的N1波幅;两因素交互作用不显著(P=0.324)。(2)N170波幅:情绪效价间主效应显著(P=0.031),负性情绪诱发出更大的N170成分;按键次序间主效不显著(P=0.249);两因素交互作用不显著(P=0.187)。结论:(1)强烈的负性情绪会对动作速度产生显著干扰效应,这种干扰效应可能是由于负性情绪加工占用了更多的认知资源导致的(2)执行动作任务时注意越集中,动作速度越快。
[Abstract]:Competitive competition is a dynamic development process, often accompanied by a variety of emotional changes. We often see the failure of athletes due to abnormal performance, which has a great relationship with the emotional state of the athletes at that time, especially the negative emotional state. In addition, the movement speed plays a very important role in the whole field of competitive competition, and the key to win many sports events is to regulate and control the movement speed effectively. Therefore, discussing the influence of negative emotion on movement speed will be helpful to guide athletes to regulate and control the movement speed effectively on the field and to win the final victory. In this study, the effects of negative emotion on motor speed were discussed from two aspects: behavioral and ERP characteristics, combining emotional induction with task-prompting paradigm. In experiment one, the behavioral characteristics of negative emotion on motor speed were discussed. The subjects were asked to watch emotional pictures (different titer emotional pictures presented in a pseudo-random manner, to ensure that the same titer of the picture presented at most two consecutive), and then at the prompt of the target stimulation to complete the task of pressing the key quickly six times. Record the time of completion of the first and sixth action tasks. The results of ANOVA of two factors (emotional titer 脳 bond order) showed that the main effect between emotional titers was not significant (p < 0.087), but the main effect was significant in bond order (p = 0.014), and the interaction between the two factors was not significant (p = 0.271). The second experiment focused on the behavioral and ERP characteristics of negative emotion on motor speed. The subjects were asked to watch emotional pictures (neutral and negative emotion pictures presented in the whole group), then complete six key-action tasks quickly at the prompt of target stimulation, record the first and sixth time of completing the task, and collect the ERP data. The different emotional titers were divided into three periods according to the order of picture presentation, and the behavior and ERP data of the three periods were statistically analyzed. The results of behavioral data were as follows: (1) the main effect between the early emotional titers was not significant (p < 0. 103), but the main effect was significant in the order of bond (p < 0. 001). The interaction between the two factors was not significant (p < 0. 963). (2). The main effect between the two factors was not significant in the mid-term (p = 0. 146), but in the order of bond was significant (p < 0. 039). The interaction between the two factors was not significant (p < 0. 469). (3). The main effect between the two factors was significant (p < 0. 042) in the late stage of emotional titers, and the speed of movement in negative mood was significantly slower than that in neutral condition. The main effect between the two factors was significant (p < 0.002), but the interaction between the two factors was not significant (p = 0.643). The results of ANOVA were as follows: (1) N1 amplitude: the main effect between mood titers was not significant (P = 0.350); The main effect was significant in the order of keystroke (P0. 043), and a larger N1 amplitude was induced by the sixth keystroke. The interaction between the two factors was not significant (P < 0. 324). (2). The main effect between the two factors was significant (P < 0. 031), and the negative emotion induced a larger N170 component, but the key effect was not significant in the order of pressing the key (P < 0. 249). The interaction between the two factors was not significant (P < 0. 187). Conclusion: (1) strong negative emotion can cause significant disturbance effect on motor speed, which may be due to negative emotion processing taking up more cognitive resources. (2) more attention is paid to the execution of motor tasks. The faster you move.
【学位授予单位】：上海体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6
[Abstract]:Competitive competition is a dynamic development process, often accompanied by a variety of emotional changes. We often see the failure of athletes due to abnormal performance, which has a great relationship with the emotional state of the athletes at that time, especially the negative emotional state. In addition, the movement speed plays a very important role in the whole field of competitive competition, and the key to win many sports events is to regulate and control the movement speed effectively. Therefore, discussing the influence of negative emotion on movement speed will be helpful to guide athletes to regulate and control the movement speed effectively on the field and to win the final victory. In this study, the effects of negative emotion on motor speed were discussed from two aspects: behavioral and ERP characteristics, combining emotional induction with task-prompting paradigm. In experiment one, the behavioral characteristics of negative emotion on motor speed were discussed. The subjects were asked to watch emotional pictures (different titer emotional pictures presented in a pseudo-random manner, to ensure that the same titer of the picture presented at most two consecutive), and then at the prompt of the target stimulation to complete the task of pressing the key quickly six times. Record the time of completion of the first and sixth action tasks. The results of ANOVA of two factors (emotional titer 脳 bond order) showed that the main effect between emotional titers was not significant (p < 0.087), but the main effect was significant in bond order (p = 0.014), and the interaction between the two factors was not significant (p = 0.271). The second experiment focused on the behavioral and ERP characteristics of negative emotion on motor speed. The subjects were asked to watch emotional pictures (neutral and negative emotion pictures presented in the whole group), then complete six key-action tasks quickly at the prompt of target stimulation, record the first and sixth time of completing the task, and collect the ERP data. The different emotional titers were divided into three periods according to the order of picture presentation, and the behavior and ERP data of the three periods were statistically analyzed. The results of behavioral data were as follows: (1) the main effect between the early emotional titers was not significant (p < 0. 103), but the main effect was significant in the order of bond (p < 0. 001). The interaction between the two factors was not significant (p < 0. 963). (2). The main effect between the two factors was not significant in the mid-term (p = 0. 146), but in the order of bond was significant (p < 0. 039). The interaction between the two factors was not significant (p < 0. 469). (3). The main effect between the two factors was significant (p < 0. 042) in the late stage of emotional titers, and the speed of movement in negative mood was significantly slower than that in neutral condition. The main effect between the two factors was significant (p < 0.002), but the interaction between the two factors was not significant (p = 0.643). The results of ANOVA were as follows: (1) N1 amplitude: the main effect between mood titers was not significant (P = 0.350); The main effect was significant in the order of keystroke (P0. 043), and a larger N1 amplitude was induced by the sixth keystroke. The interaction between the two factors was not significant (P < 0. 324). (2). The main effect between the two factors was significant (P < 0. 031), and the negative emotion induced a larger N170 component, but the key effect was not significant in the order of pressing the key (P < 0. 249). The interaction between the two factors was not significant (P < 0. 187). Conclusion: (1) strong negative emotion can cause significant disturbance effect on motor speed, which may be due to negative emotion processing taking up more cognitive resources. (2) more attention is paid to the execution of motor tasks. The faster you move.
【学位授予单位】：上海体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 杨韵;梁宗保;张光珍;;情绪加工的早期事件相关电位成分的分析比较[J];心理研究;2016年05期
2 张晓雯;yび蠲，
本文编号：2466091
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2466091.html
