关系侵犯感知的文化差异及应对技巧

发布时间：2021-06-07 19:19

　　目前的研究涉及在中国的大学里通过多重文化观点,对公开、关系侵犯和受害进行一次综合的调查。结果模型涉及调查的大学生的年龄,种族及性别的差异。来自欧洲,亚洲,美国和非洲的175名男生和124名女生参与这项研究。这项研究有3个目标：（a）调查在中国大学里的青壮年在关系侵害和受害方面性别的差异（b）调查性别、文化及关系侵犯和受害之间的关系（c）探索参与者对于关系和社会受害的反应应对。这项研究旨在调查在学生中社会化进程和这些关于物理及关系、社会受害之间由于性别的不同而产生的跨国文化的差异和相似性。在文化和关系、社会受害两个变量之间是正相关关系。在该处：r=.137,n=300,p=0.17。总体来说,在文化和关系、社会受害之间是强烈的、正相关关系。参与者采取不同的应对反应。其中20%使用规划,从其他得到支持的占28%,40%拒绝,而其他的使用各种各样别的策略。 

【文章来源】：华中师范大学湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：113 页

【学位级别】：博士

【文章目录】：
题词
DEDICATION
摘要
ABSTRACT
CONTENTS
CHAPTER Ⅰ:INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
    1.1 BACKGROUND
    1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
    1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
    1.4 HYPOTHESIS
    1.5 THE PURPOSE OF STUDY
    1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
CHAAPTER 2:LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 AGGRESSION CONTEXT
    2.2 Intent to harm
    2.3 Motivation of the victim
    2.4 DEFINITION:CONCEPT OF AGGRESSION
    2.5 TYPES OF AGGRESSION
    2.6 PREVALENCE OF AGGRESSION
    2.7
        2.7.1 Gender differences in relational aggression
    2.8 SOCIAL STATUS IN RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL AGGRESSION
    2.9 POPULARITY IN RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL AGGRESSION
    2.10 DIFFERENT PARTICIPATION AND ROLES
        2.10.1 The aggressive system
        2.10.2 The aggressor
        2.10.3 Victims relational aggression
        2.10.4 Bullies:the peer context
        2.10.5 Bully-victims and relational aggression
    2.11 SITUATIONAL FACTORS:CAUSES
    2.12 CONSEQUENCES OF VICTIMIZATION
        2.12.1 Repercussion:consequences of Aggression
    2.13 DIFFERENCES IN CONSEQUENCES OF VICTIMIZATION FOR VICTIMS AND BULLY-VICTIMS
    2.15 Suicide ideation and attempts
    2.16 ENVIRONNEMENTAL AND PREVENTION
    2.17 Prevention programs
CHAPTER Ⅲ:THEORTICAL FRAMWORK
    3.1 ETHOLOGY:RELATIONAL AGGRESSION
        3.1.1 interspecific aggression:Species and groups
        3.1.2 Conspecifics:a group
    3.2 EVOLUTIONARY EXPLANATIONS
        3.2.1 Violence and cnflict
        3.2.2 Gender social role
    3.3 GENBTICS PHYSIOLOGY
        3.3.1 Behaviors genetics
        3.3.2 Hormones and aggression
        3.3.3 Brain mechanisms
    3.4 HUMANS AND AGGRESSION
        3.4.1 Culture factor of aggression Cross-cultural
        3.4.2 Media roles in Aggression
        3.4.3 Children
        3.4.4 Gender:relational roles
        3.4.5 Situational factors
        3.4.6 Factors temperatures
        3.4.7 Effects of aggression
    3.5 EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
    3.6 INSTINCT THEORY
    3.7 SOCIO-CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORY
        3.7.1 Social Learning theory
        3.7.2 Observational Learning
CHAPTER Ⅳ:METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
    4.1 Definitions of terms study
    4.2 Quantitative approach
    4.3 Survey design
    4.4 Subjects
    4.5 Sample Size
    4.6 Data collection procedures
    4.7 VALIDITY
        4.7.1 Content validity
        4.7.2 Face validity
    4.8 RELIABILITY
    4.9 Data analysis plan
    4.10 Ethical Issues
    4.11 Measures and Analysis of Data
        4.11.1 Demographic Questionnaire
        4.11.2 Relational aggression Questionnaire
        4.11.3 Coping skills
CHAPTER Ⅴ:RESULTS OF THE STUDY
    5.1 DEMOGRAPHICS
    5.2 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND CULTURE AND RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL VICTIMIZATION
    5.3 GENDER AND CULTURE AS A PREDICTOR OF STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL VICTIMIZATION
    5.4 COPING RESPONSES TO RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL VICTIMIZATION
    5.5. COPING BETWEEN GENDER AND CULTURE DIFFERENCES
    5.6 CORRELATIONS OF COPING AND RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL VICTIMIZATION
    5.7 LINEAR REGRESSION OF COPING AND RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL VICTIMIZATION
CHAPTER Ⅵ:DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
    6.1 DEMOGRAPHIC OF PARTICIPANTS
    6.2 GENDER AND AGGRESSION
    6.3 COPING STRATEGIES AND GENDER
    6.4 RELATIONAL AND SOCIAL VICTIZATION AND COPING
    6.5 CONCLUSION
    6.6 LIMITATIONS
    6.7 RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE RESEARCH
REFERENCES
APPENDIX(C)
ABREVIATIONS
致谢
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS



本文编号：3217155