“一带一路”的战略方向与实践路径:中美的比较

发布时间：2018-03-13 02:10

本文选题：“一带一路”倡议　切入点：新丝绸之路战略　出处：《东南学术》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：美国2011年提出的"新丝绸之路"倡议和中国2013年正式提出的"一带一路"倡议是推进两国地区性战略实施的标志性方案,在战略实施对象和战略内容上具有一定的相似性。但是,由于中美两国对上述战略的设想不同,所期解决的战略问题不同,所以两国的倡议在战略目标与实践路径上存在较大差异。美国的"丝绸之路倡议"更具有"外生"性质,其试图通过扶持印度势力增长,促进中亚、阿富汗及南亚等地区的经济联系和同步增长,从而保障上述地区长治久安,同时遏制中国、俄罗斯等大国复兴战略的实施。相比之下,中国"一带一路"倡议具有"内生"性质特征,具体表现为在基于更为开放式的理念下,以实现中国与周边国家的共同发展为目标,以经济手段为主要战略实施手段促进中国与周边国家经济均衡增长。从具体实施路径而言,美国主要从市场需求角度实施其丝绸之路战略,在战略实施中侧重于解决上述国家与地区市场需求方面的问题,而中国则更多地从市场供给角度出发,侧重于通过改善当地经济增长条件推动经济发展。
[Abstract]:The "New Silk Road" initiative put forward by the United States on 2011 and the "Belt and Road" initiative formally put forward by China on 2013 are symbolic plans to promote the implementation of the regional strategy between the two countries. There are some similarities in the object and content of the strategy. However, due to the difference of the two countries' ideas on the above strategy, the strategic problems to be solved in the future are different. Therefore, the two countries' initiatives have quite different strategic objectives and practical paths. The "Silk Road Initiative" of the United States is more "exogenous" in nature. It tries to promote Central Asia by supporting the growth of Indian power. Economic links and simultaneous growth in Afghanistan and South Asia, thus ensuring long-term stability in these regions, while containing the implementation of the strategy of renaissance of major countries such as China and Russia. By contrast, The "Belt and Road" initiative of China is characterized by its "endogenetic" nature, which is manifested in its goal of realizing the common development of China and its neighboring countries based on a more open concept. Taking economic means as the main means of strategic implementation to promote balanced economic growth between China and neighboring countries, the United States mainly implements its Silk Road strategy from the point of view of market demand. In the implementation of the strategy, we focus on solving the problems of market demand in the above countries and regions, while China focuses more on promoting economic development through improving local economic growth conditions from the point of view of market supply.
【作者单位】：厦门大学经济学院;
【分类号】：F125;F171.2

【相似文献】