区域研究与国际政治学的对话与融合——兼论“一带一路”倡议的智力支持建构

发布时间：2018-04-28 01:45

本文选题：区域研究 + 国际政治学　；参考：《外交评论(外交学院学报)》2017年05期

【摘要】：中国作为一个正在迅速成长的世界性大国,以"一带一路"为代表的战略性外交构想和实践在短时间内催生了巨大的知识需求,急需区域研究和理论研究、学理性研究和实证性研究的有效对话和有机合作。然而,区域和国别研究长期以来存在缺乏理论和学理性视角、重实证轻理论的情况,难以满足上述激增的知识需求。美国的中东研究经验告诉我们,区域研究在与政治学融合的过程中,需要具备理论自信和批判精神以保持研究日程设定的独立性,而不是被主流的政治学结论牵着鼻子走。与美国的情况不同,日本的中国研究则显示出区域研究日程被研究对象的短期动态所左右的现象,多为"描述性分析"而欠缺理论视角。缺乏知识竞争环境影响了日本的中国研究与政治学有机融合的速度和质量,削弱了其政策和社会承认度。在借鉴美日的经验和教训的基础上,中国的区域研究与政治学要努力建立一种相互平等、互敬互利和良性竞争的知识关系,走出一条对话和融合的新路。
[Abstract]:As a rapidly growing world power, China's strategic diplomatic concept and practice, represented by "Belt and Road", has given birth to a huge demand for knowledge in a short period of time and is in urgent need of regional and theoretical research. The effective dialogue and organic cooperation between the scientific rational research and the empirical research. However, for a long time, regional and country studies lack of theoretical and scientific rational perspective and put more emphasis on positivism than theory, so it is difficult to meet the knowledge demand of the surge. American experience in Middle East studies tells us that in the process of merging regional research with political science, we need to have theoretical self-confidence and critical spirit to maintain the independence of the research agenda, rather than being led by the main political conclusions by the nose. In contrast to the situation in the United States, the Chinese studies in Japan show that the regional research agenda is dominated by the short-term dynamics of the subjects, and most of them are "descriptive analysis" and lack a theoretical perspective. The lack of knowledge competitive environment affects the speed and quality of the integration of Chinese research and political science in Japan and weakens its policy and social recognition. On the basis of the experiences and lessons of the United States and Japan, China's regional research and political science should strive to establish a knowledge relationship of mutual equality, mutual respect and mutual benefit and healthy competition, so as to find a new path of dialogue and integration.
【作者单位】：日本国立新o_大学;
【分类号】：D0

【相似文献】