战略对接对崛起国家海权发展成败的影响研究

发布时间：2017-12-27 15:34

  本文关键词：战略对接对崛起国家海权发展成败的影响研究　出处：《天津师范大学》2017年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

  更多相关文章： 崛起国家 战略对接 海权 系统能量传送力

【摘要】：本文的研究主题来源于现实情况与历史问题相结合所导致的困惑。一方面,当下中国自提出"一带一路"倡议后,积极构建与一些重要国家的战略对接关系,同时作为崛起大国,中国的海权事业也在蓬勃发展,那么在复杂的国际环境下,中国对外构建战略对接的行为对海权领域的发展会起到推动作用还是阻碍作用?另一方面,为什么在19世纪末至第二次世界大战期间,美国和德国作为崛起国家都在发展海权,且这种行为都挑战了英国的海洋霸主地位,但是最终美国胜利了而德国却失败了?基于上述困惑,并结合当下时事,本文采用了一个新的角度,即从战略对接的视角来研究海权。因此,本文要研究的核心问题是:国家间构建的战略对接如何影响崛起国家海权发展成败?并进一步提出了本文的核心假设:不同战略对接的选择会通过系统能量传送力影响崛起国家海权发展成败。本文的核心观点是:建立战略对接的两国作为国际系统之下的子系统,会在系统能量传送力的作用下对其中一国内部某一具体领域的发展产生影响。为了论证这一观点及验证研究假设,本文采用了诠释法、模型分析法和案例法。基本思路是将国家间建立的战略对接关系视为国际系统之下的"子系统",它具有系统的属性和功能,由两个国家构成,但真正起推动作用的是国家内部的各个发展领域。在本文中,国家被定义为一级单元,国内的发展领域被定义为二级单元。本文研究的重点就是子系统与二级单元之间的关系。因此,本文中提出了一个重要概念,即"系统能量传送力",它是连接子系统到二级单元之间的重要纽带,是能量在系统内进行转移和传送的重要机制,它发挥作用·需要依托供需关系的平衡、战略对接模式、战略对接国和战略对接领域的选择。有了这一机制,就能够解释"子系统"是如何对二级单元的发展施加影响,从而为战略对接对海权的影响提供解释力。接下来,本文采用了案例验证的方法,使用美国和德国海权发展成败这一正一反两个案例对研究假设进行验证。为了使两个案例具有统一性,案例的时间范围都控制在自1890年至1945年这长达半个世纪的时间段内。在经过两个历史案例验证后,本文又以系统理论为指导,对案例验证得出的基本结论进行理论上的提炼和升华,进而得出四点结论:第一,战略对接建立与维持的基本原则是两国供需关系的平衡;第二,战略对接对海权的影响取决于对接模式、对接国和对接领域的选择;第三,系统能量传送力是战略对接得以跨层次影响海权发展的关键机制;第四,国家间体系与国家内部发展领域之间存在双向建构关系。根据以上四点结论,本文给出的政策建议是:首先,中国在进行战略对接时必须要仔细权衡本国的战略需求程度和战略供给能力,避免"供需失衡"情况的出现;其次,中国在构建战略对接时要基于本国海权等重点发展领域的需求,对战略对接模式、战略对接国和战略对接领域进行慎重的选择;最后,国家应尽量建立海权领域的直接战略对接,如果在其他领域进行对接,也应通过合理的规划与调整,使在非海权领域的战略对接能够起到反哺海权的作用。最终实现战略对接与海权领域相互促进,协同发展。
[Abstract]:The research topic of this article comes from the confusion caused by the combination of the reality and the historical problems. On the one hand, the current China since the introduction of The Belt and Road "initiative, and actively build the strategic docking relationship of some important countries, at the same time as a rising power, China sea power business is also booming, so in the complex international environment, the development of foreign Chinese constructing strategic docking behavior of sea power in the field of play to promote or hinder? On the other hand, why during the late nineteenth Century to the Second World War, the United States and Germany as emerging countries in the development of sea power, and this behavior have challenged the British marine hegemony, but the final victory of the United States and Germany failed? Based on the above problems, combined with the current current, this paper adopts a new angle, namely from a strategic perspective to study the docking of sea power. Therefore, the core issue of this article is: the national strategic docking construction how to influence the rise of state of sea power development success? And further puts forward the core hypothesis of the thesis: different strategic choice through the docking system of energy transfer effect rise of state of sea power development success. The core point of this paper is to establish a strategic docking of two countries as subsystems under the international system, which will have an impact on the development of one specific part of the domestic sector under the action of the system's energy transmission force. In order to prove this point of view and to verify the hypothesis, this paper adopts the interpretation method, the model analysis method and the case method. The basic idea is to regard the strategic docking relationship between countries as a sub system under the international system. It has system attributes and functions, consisting of two countries, but what really promotes is the various development fields within the country. In this article, the state is defined as a first level unit, and the development of the country is defined as a two level unit. The focus of this paper is the relationship between the subsystem and the two level unit. Therefore, this paper proposes an important concept, namely "energy transfer system", it is connected to the system and an important link between two units, is an important mechanism of energy transfer and transfer within the system, it can play a role, need to rely on the relationship of supply and demand balance, strategic docking mode, strategic docking in China and the choice of strategic docking. With this mechanism, it will be able to explain how the "subsystem" affects the development of the two level unit, thus providing an explanation for the impact of strategic docking on sea rights. Then, this paper uses a case study to verify the research hypothesis using the two cases of the success or failure of the development of the American and German sea rights. In order to make the two cases unified, the time range of the case is controlled in the half century period from 1890 to 1945. After two historical cases after verification, this paper is guided by the system theory, the basic conclusion of the case verify that the refining and sublimation of the theory, and then draw four conclusions: first, establish the basic principles and maintain strategic docking between the two countries is the relationship between supply and demand balance; second, strategic docking effect on sea power depending on the docking mode, docking and docking areas; third, the system energy transfer force is the key mechanism of strategic docking to influence the development of sea power and cross level; fourth, there is a two-way relationship between national construction system and national development within the area. According to the above four conclusions, policy recommendations in this paper are: first, China must carefully weigh their strategic docking strategy and strategic demand supply capacity, to avoid "the imbalance of supply and demand situation; secondly, China to based on their sea power needs of key development areas in the construction of strategic docking. By careful choice of strategic docking mode, strategic docking and strategic docking areas; finally, countries should try to establish a direct docking strategy of sea power field, if the docking in other areas, should be through the planning and reasonable adjustment, make strategic docking in the field of non sea power can play the role of nurturing sea power. The final realization of the strategic docking and the field of sea power to promote each other, coordinated development.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D815
，

本文编号：1342305