基于病人行为的预约调度优化模型
发布时间:2021-08-23 14:55
本文研究了医疗门诊的预约调度中考虑病人行为的优化问题。预约调度指的是在提供医疗服务之前,为病人决定一个期望的服务时间,而病人的行为包括不进行预约、爽约以及病人的偏好等。本文从理论或实践出发,研究了以下几个重要问题。第一,文献中关于预约调度的研究通过数值实验发现,当对每个病人的服务时长为独立同分布时,最优的调度呈现“屋顶”形状。为了分析类似“屋顶”形状调度策略的理论性质及性能,本文深入研究了一个简单但有效的调度策略--平稳调度策略。该策略对每一个预约者设置相等的服务间隔时长。在服务时长独立同分布的条件下,本文估计了最优调度与平稳调度策略之间的性能差距,并证明了该差距随着预约病人数量的增加而减少。基于此结论,本文证明了平稳调度策略随着预约病人数量的增加是渐近最优的。本文也将这一渐近最优性质扩展到多种服务时长类型(即分段独立同分布)的情景,并证明了在这种情况下分段平稳调度策略仍然是渐近最优的。第二,本文考虑了一个实际的预约调度问题:其中有一部分病人事先不进行预约(即Walk-ins病人)。对于存在不预约病人的预约调度问题,本文把预约病人和不预约病人分为两种类型,并根据实际情况对他们给予不同的...
【文章来源】:上海交通大学上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】:142 页
【学位级别】:博士
【文章目录】:
摘要
abstract
Chapter1 Introduction
1.1 OR in Health Care
1.2 Appointment Scheduling in Health Care
1.3 Incorporating Patients behavior to Appointment Scheduling
1.3.1 Appointment Scheduling with Walk-ins and No-shows
1.3.2 Walk-in patients Dominating Scheduled Patients
1.4 Framework of Thesis
Chapter2 Performance Bounds of Constant Job-Allowance Policies forAppointment Scheduling
2.1 Literature Review
2.2 Problem Formulation
2.3 The Plateau Policy
2.3.1 Statement of Theorem2.3.1 and Discussion
2.3.2 Proof of Theorem2.3.1
2.3.3 When Patients Have No-Shows
2.4 Multiple Types of Appointments:The Piecewise Plateau Policy
2.4.1 Statement of Theorem2.4.1 and Discussion
2.4.2 Proof of Theorem2.4.1
2.5 Computational Results:Performance of the Plateau and PiecewisePlateau Policies
2.5.1 Homogeneous Customers:I.I.D.Service Durations
2.5.2 Multiple Customers Types:Piecewise I.I.D.Service Dura-tions
2.6 Summary
Chapter3 Managing Appointment Scheduling with Walk-ins underTwo-agent Perspective
3.1 Literature Review
3.2 Problem Formulation
3.3 Without No-shows
3.3.1 Structural Properties
3.3.2 MILP Reformulation
3.4 Incorporating No-shows
3.4.1 Structural Properties
3.4.2 MILP Reformulation
3.5 Computational Experiments
3.5.1 No Hole Structure of Optimal Schedule
3.5.2 Optimal Schedule Analysis When Incorporating No-shows
3.6 Summary
Chapter4 Managing Time-window based Appointment Services underPatient Preferences and in the Presence of Walk-in Patients
4.1 Literature Review
4.2 Preemptive Case:Problem Formulations and Solutions
4.2.1 Problem Description and Formulation
4.2.2 Equivalent Formulation
4.2.3 Second Order Cone Programming(SOCP)
4.2.4 Deterministic Allocation Policy
4.3 Non-Preemptive Case
4.3.1 Dynamic Programming
4.3.2 Heuristic Algorithm
4.4 Computational Experiments
4.5 Summary
Chapter5 Conclusion
5.1 Main Contributions of Thesis
5.2 Future Work
References
Acknowledgements
Research Papers
Projects
本文编号:3358079
【文章来源】:上海交通大学上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】:142 页
【学位级别】:博士
【文章目录】:
摘要
abstract
Chapter1 Introduction
1.1 OR in Health Care
1.2 Appointment Scheduling in Health Care
1.3 Incorporating Patients behavior to Appointment Scheduling
1.3.1 Appointment Scheduling with Walk-ins and No-shows
1.3.2 Walk-in patients Dominating Scheduled Patients
1.4 Framework of Thesis
Chapter2 Performance Bounds of Constant Job-Allowance Policies forAppointment Scheduling
2.1 Literature Review
2.2 Problem Formulation
2.3 The Plateau Policy
2.3.1 Statement of Theorem2.3.1 and Discussion
2.3.2 Proof of Theorem2.3.1
2.3.3 When Patients Have No-Shows
2.4 Multiple Types of Appointments:The Piecewise Plateau Policy
2.4.1 Statement of Theorem2.4.1 and Discussion
2.4.2 Proof of Theorem2.4.1
2.5 Computational Results:Performance of the Plateau and PiecewisePlateau Policies
2.5.1 Homogeneous Customers:I.I.D.Service Durations
2.5.2 Multiple Customers Types:Piecewise I.I.D.Service Dura-tions
2.6 Summary
Chapter3 Managing Appointment Scheduling with Walk-ins underTwo-agent Perspective
3.1 Literature Review
3.2 Problem Formulation
3.3 Without No-shows
3.3.1 Structural Properties
3.3.2 MILP Reformulation
3.4 Incorporating No-shows
3.4.1 Structural Properties
3.4.2 MILP Reformulation
3.5 Computational Experiments
3.5.1 No Hole Structure of Optimal Schedule
3.5.2 Optimal Schedule Analysis When Incorporating No-shows
3.6 Summary
Chapter4 Managing Time-window based Appointment Services underPatient Preferences and in the Presence of Walk-in Patients
4.1 Literature Review
4.2 Preemptive Case:Problem Formulations and Solutions
4.2.1 Problem Description and Formulation
4.2.2 Equivalent Formulation
4.2.3 Second Order Cone Programming(SOCP)
4.2.4 Deterministic Allocation Policy
4.3 Non-Preemptive Case
4.3.1 Dynamic Programming
4.3.2 Heuristic Algorithm
4.4 Computational Experiments
4.5 Summary
Chapter5 Conclusion
5.1 Main Contributions of Thesis
5.2 Future Work
References
Acknowledgements
Research Papers
Projects
本文编号:3358079
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/yxlbs/3358079.html
教材专著