重庆市中考英语完形填空题效度研究（2011-2016）

发布时间：2018-01-07 20:01

本文关键词：重庆市中考英语完形填空题效度研究（2011-2016）　出处：《重庆三峡学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：一份试题有效与否意味着这个考试是否考出了它想考的能力。如果考试对它所想测的东西无效,那么考试的分数对它的原始目的来说毫无意义。进行效度研究可以证明一个考试有效与否。本研究通过选取重庆市万州中学初中三年级学生140名和27名英语教师作为样本,对重庆市中考英语完形填空题效度进行测试及问卷调查,分析近6年重庆市中考英语完形填空试题的考点效度、内容效度、结构效度、表面效度,以尝试分析解决以下问题:(1)2011-2016年重庆市中考英语完形填空试题的考点效度如何?(2)2011-2016年重庆市中考英语完形填空试题的内容效度如何?(3)2011-2016年重庆市中考英语完形填空试题的结构效度如何?(4)2011-2016年重庆市中考英语完形填空试题的表面效度如何?研究表明:(1)关于考点效度:2011-2016年考查句子与语篇的试题占较大的比重,均避免了单单看单词就能锁定正确答案的试题。其中,在2015年,句子与语篇的考查占了 100%,对学生的句子、语篇能力作了考查。就语篇这一最高层次来说,除2013年外,其余各试卷均占有相当重的比例,分别为30%、50%、20%、30%、40%、40%,这说明命题人为突破句子层次作出了相应的努力。除2013年外,其余5年试题的焦点因素均避免考查语法。2011-2016年试题均侧重对意义的考查。(2)关于内容效度:纵观2011-2016年文章的体裁,多为应用文和记叙文,可适当增加别的体裁。题材均与学生日常生活息息相关。特别是2016年的文章,通过种花来引导人们拥有热爱生活、发现幸福的人生观,选文具有一定的人文性。2011-2016年完形填空所选材料文本易读度指数分别属于"很容易、容易、很容易、较容易、较容易、很容易"。基本符合《标准》及考试大纲要求,但2011-2016年所选材料的易读度指数略有起伏,这一点可以更好地改善。(3)关于结构效度:学生在做完形填空题过程中,运用与文章相关的背景知识进行猜测与学生测试得分均有很强的正相关(p0.01);得分7-8的会从理解每段话的意思入手;对策略11的使用,得分9-10的显著高于6分及以下的学生。得分9-10分的运用4项策略(分析句与句之间的关系、读完一整段再找答案、运用排除法找出答案和文章太难就靠猜测)要少于7-8分的学生。其余10项策略表现出来的总体规律是,得分越高对策略的使用越多,结构效度有效。(4)关于表面效度:学生对中考英语完形填空试题的总体印象、形式、内容和体裁、考察内容及试题是否需要改进五类效度的观点基本一致,对中考英语完形填空试题效度保持同意和基本同意观点。教师对中考英语完形填空试题的总体印象、形式、内容和体裁、考察内容及试题是否需要改进五类效度的观点基本一致,对中考英语完形填空试题效度保持基本同意和部分同意的观点,无极力反对和不同意观点的存在,表明效度较高。为了保证试题的效度,本研究有以下几方面建议:(一)对试题编制者来说,选材的体裁应更为丰富;在设置试题与选项时要慎重,尽量避免学生使用猜测策略。(二)对教师来说,应尽量为学生提供广泛阅读的机会,不仅注重语言能力的培养,也要注重人文素质的培养。
[Abstract]:A test validity means that the test is taken out of it. If you want to test for it wants to test what is invalid, then the scores of the test of its original purpose is meaningless. The validity study can prove a test is valid or not. This paper selects Chongqing City Middle School of Wanzhou the third grade of junior middle school 140 students and 27 teachers as samples, test and questionnaire survey to the Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination cloze validity analysis in recent 6 years in Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination English Cloze Test Validity, content validity, structure validity, face validity, analysis to try to solve the following problems: (1) how to 2011-2016 years of Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination English Cloze Test validity? (2) to 2011-2016 years in Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination cloze test content validity? (3) 2011-2016 years in the city of Chongqing to test English Cloze How to construct validity to fill in the blank questions? (4) how to face validity 2011-2016 Chongqing City senior high school entrance examination cloze test? Research shows that: (1): 2011-2016 test on test validity of sentences and discourse papers accounted for a larger proportion of avoiding words alone can lock the correct answer to the questions. Among them, in 2015, the sentence and discourse examination accounted for 100% of students, sentence, discourse competence were examined. The discourse is the highest level, except for 2013, the rest of the paper was to occupy very heavy proportion, respectively 30%, 50%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 40%, this shows that the proposition of human breakthrough made corresponding to the sentence level. Except for 2013, the remaining 5 years test focus factors are to avoid the exemption.2011-2016 check the grammar questions focused on the significance of the study. (2) on content validity: the 2011-2016 genre throughout the year, as the application and Ji Xuwen That may be appropriate to increase the other genre. Themes and are closely related to students' daily life. Especially in 2016, to guide people through the flowers have found the love of life, happiness life, selection has certain humanities.2011-2016 cloze materials selected text easy to read index belong to "easy, easy, easy that is easy, easy, easy." < standard > and accord with the syllabus requirements, but 2011-2016 selected material readability index slightly downs, this point can be improved. (3) on the structure validity: students doing cloze test in the process of using, and articles related to background knowledge and students' test scores were guessing is a strong positive correlation (P0.01); 7-8 score will start from the understanding of each sentence meaning; on the 11 strategies used, 9-10 score was significantly higher than that of 6 points and score of 9-10 students. Use of the 4 strategies (the analysis of relationship between sentences and sentences read a paragraph to find the answer, by the method of exclusion, and find out the answer and the article too difficult to guess) less than 7-8 students. General rule of the remaining 10 strategies show that the higher the score strategy use more construct validity. (4) on the surface of validity: students of senior high school entrance examination of English Cloze Test in the overall impression, form, content and style, whether the investigation contents and questions need to be improved five kinds of validity are basically the same point of view, the senior high school entrance examination cloze test validity to maintain agreed and agreed with the teachers of basic English Cloze Tests in senior high school entrance examination. Test the overall impression, form, content and style, whether the investigation contents and questions need to be improved five kinds of validity are basically the same point of view, basically agree on English Cloze Test in senior high school entrance examination validity and part of the agreed point of view, no Do not agree and strongly opposed to the existence of high validity. In order to ensure that the validity of a test, this study has the following suggestions: (a) the test preparation for the selection of the genre should be more rich; we must be cautious in setting questions and options, try to avoid the use of students (two) of the guessing game. The teacher, should try to provide students with extensive reading opportunities, not only pay attention to the cultivation of language ability, also want to pay attention to the cultivation of humanistic quality.

【学位授予单位】：重庆三峡学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G633.41

【参考文献】