霍米巴巴后殖民理论视域下莫里森三部小说中的文化身份研究

发布时间:2018-01-19 12:07

  本文关键词: 霍米·巴巴后殖民主 文化身份 模仿 混杂性 出处:《鲁东大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:全球化语境下的少数族裔文化身份认同问题因其复杂的社会性、历史性和政治性逐渐成为近年来人文社科等诸多领域研究的核心议题。后殖民理论作为当下学术研究中直接对话殖民关系的多元文化理论,一直致力于研究西方国家与第三世界散居族裔之间的政治差异与文化冲突。后殖民主义学者霍米·巴巴始终关注并深知文化差异与冲突下少数族裔的身份诉求与重塑困境,其中文化身份建构是其理论的核心关注点,而此议题也是美国非裔女作家诺贝尔文学奖得主托尼·莫里森文学创作一直秉承的重要主题。本文依托霍米·巴巴的后殖民理论,通过对托尼·莫里森《最蓝的眼睛》、《所罗门之歌》、《宠儿》三部小说的文本细读和对比分析,从被殖民者的视角探讨了不同阶层的非裔美国人在不同社会历史背景下文化身份重构方式的延续性和差异性,论证了自我认同、家庭关爱和黑人社区的凝聚力等因素在黑人主体性重塑过程中的相互作用以及非裔美国人如何在巴巴式的第三空间中消解殖民二元对立模式,解构白人文化霸权,重构出一种混杂而更加开放健康的黑人文化身份。本文重点通过横向和纵向对三部小说中三位主人公失败,单一及混杂文化身份重构方式的对比研究,归纳出了影响非裔美国人文化身份重构的多重因素,并得出结论:后殖民语境中的黑人文化身份重构是一种持续变化的流动过程。莫里森通过解构白人文化霸权,挑战恒定、单一的文化身份概念,在霍米·巴巴式的第三空间中重新建立了全新的动态殖民话语机制,重构出了一种异质的、流动的、协商的、混杂的文化身份,实现了被殖民者权力话语的言说。本文将霍米·巴巴后殖民理论与黑人文化身份结合起来,通过解构西方殖民话语悖谬,重新书写殖民话语,重构了非裔美国人的真实形象。本文的研究方法与结论为已有的后殖民研究提供了一定的补充,同时也对其他少数族裔研究具有一定的参考价值。此外,在全球化语境下研究非裔文学能够帮助我们更好的理解当下全球移民问题和多元文化共存时存在的身份焦虑与重塑困境,同时也督促我们自我反省,学会如何求同存异,此研究具有一定的现实意义。
[Abstract]:The problem of cultural identity of ethnic minorities in the context of globalization is due to its complex sociality. In recent years, history and politics have gradually become the core topic of research in humanities, social sciences and other fields. Post-colonial theory is a multicultural theory of direct dialogue and colonial relationship in current academic research. He's been working on political differences and cultural conflicts between Western countries and the third World diaspora. Homi Baba, a postcolonial scholar, has always been concerned and well aware of cultural differences and the identity claims of minorities in conflict. Reshaping the predicament. The construction of cultural identity is the core concern of its theory. This issue is also an important theme that Tony Morrison, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in the United States, has been following. This article relies on Homi Baba's postcolonial theory. By reading and comparing the texts of Tony Morrison's Blue eyes, Song of Solomon, beloved, three novels. From the perspective of the colonized people, this paper discusses the continuity and difference of the cultural identity reconstruction methods of African Americans of different strata in different social and historical backgrounds, and demonstrates their self-identity. The interaction of family care and the cohesion of black communities in the process of remolding the black subjectivity and how African Americans resolve the dualistic pattern of colonial opposition in the third space of Baba style. Deconstructing white cultural hegemony and reconstructing a mixed and more open and healthy black cultural identity this paper focuses on the failure of the three protagonists in the three novels both horizontally and vertically. The contrastive study on the ways of reconstructing the identity of single and mixed cultures induces the multiple factors that affect the reconstruction of the cultural identity of African Americans. It is concluded that the reconstruction of black cultural identity in post-colonial context is a constantly changing process. Morrison challenges the concept of constant and single cultural identity by deconstructing white cultural hegemony. In Homi Baba's third space, the new dynamic colonial discourse mechanism was re-established, reconstructing a heterogeneous, fluid, negotiated, mixed cultural identity. This paper combines Homi Baba's postcolonial theory with black cultural identity and rewrites colonial discourse by deconstructing the paradox of western colonial discourse. Reconstruction of the true image of African Americans. The research methods and conclusions of this paper provide a certain complement to the existing post-colonial research, but also have a certain reference value for other minority research. In the context of globalization, the study of African-American literature can help us to better understand the current global migration problems and multi-cultural coexistence of identity anxiety and remodeling dilemma, but also urge us to reflect on ourselves. Learning how to seek common ground while reserving differences, this research has certain realistic significance.
【学位授予单位】:鲁东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I712.074

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 肖复兴;;门旁凋谢的恶之花——关于莫里森的笔记[J];音乐生活;2010年04期

2 胡艺丹;;近三十年来中国大陆莫里森研究综述[J];常州工学院学报(社科版);2010年06期

3 陈法春;;西方莫里森研究中的几个焦点[J];外国文学动态;2000年05期

4 王改娣;莫里森作品中的“诗情画意”[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2001年06期

5 贺淑娟;;二十年来国内莫里森研究综述[J];安徽文学(下半月);2007年10期

6 黄中梅;;追求两性和谐的莫里森[J];世界文化;2008年02期

7 范良芹;;莫里森研究在美国[J];科技信息(学术研究);2008年02期

8 阳伟;;回归与超越——莫里森笔下黑色灵魂的飞驰[J];小说评论;2008年S2期

9 吴金莲;;回归自然 寻求自我 包容兼爱——莫里森对人类生存发展的思索[J];内蒙古民族大学学报;2008年05期

10 张静;李晶;;从身体社会学来解析莫里森的新作《慈悲》[J];科技信息;2010年10期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 罗晓云;;手中的鸟——析莫里森《宠儿》中的环境描写[A];走向21世纪的探索——回顾·思考·展望[C];1999年

2 王p鷓,

本文编号:1444090


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/1444090.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3f352***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com