多重原则的政治义务理论

发布时间：2018-01-19 13:12

本文关键词： 政治义务公平游戏理论多重原则理论普遍性整全性　出处：《华东师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：政治义务问题研究的是是否存在服从法律的道德理由,而一个令人接受的政治义务理论必须要满足四个标准:[1]义务主体的普遍性;[2]义务效力的有限性;[3]义务范围的整全性;[4]义务的特殊性。本文先论证在以往的政治义务理论中,共同体式的理论不能满足标准[1][2][3];同意理论不能满足标准[1];经典的功利主义不能满足标准[1][2][3];自然责任理论不能满足标准[1][4];经典版本的公平游戏理论不能满足标准[1][3]。它们的共同点就是都不能满足标准[1]。在论证了以往的政治义务理论都是失败的之后,笔者试图继续论证:1、(推定利益版本的)公平游戏理论是如何回应对经典公平游戏理论的同意反驳与限制性反驳以满足标准[1]的;2、对公平游戏理论的新近反驳——证成性裂缝反驳何以是失败的;3、乐善好施原则是如何证成公民有义务支持现代政府的福利职能而公平游戏理论无法解释这一点的;4、联合式政治义务理论是如何给我们更强的理由去支持乐善好施原则,并且很好地与公平游戏理论相容来满足标准[4]的;5、以(推定利益版本的)公平游戏理论为核心的多重原则理论是如何结合乐善好施原则、联合式政治义务理论以及共同善理论以满足标准[3]的。6、笔者试图提出一个"必要性检验"来重新对标准[1][3]进行理解。
[Abstract]:The question of political obligation is whether there is a moral reason to obey the law, and an acceptable theory of political obligation must meet four criteria:. [(1) the universality of the subject of obligation; [(2) the limitation of the validity of the obligation; [(3) the completeness of the scope of the obligation; [4] the particularity of obligation. This paper first proves that in the former theory of political obligation, the community theory can not meet the standard. [1]. [2]. [3]; the consent theory does not meet the criteria. [Classical utilitarianism does not meet the criteria. [1]. [2]. [3]; the theory of natural responsibility does not meet the criteria. [1]. [[4]; the classic version of fair play theory doesn't meet the standard. [1]. [3. What they all have in common is that they do not meet the criteria. [1]. After demonstrating that the previous theories of political obligation have all failed, the author tries to continue to demonstrate the theory of "1: 1". How does Fair Game Theory respond to agreed and restrictive rebuttal of Classical Fair Game Theory in order to meet the criteria. [1]; (2) the new refutation of fair game theory-why the refutation of proved crack is a failure; (3) how the principle of benevolence proves that citizens have the obligation to support the welfare function of modern government, which can not be explained by the theory of fair play; (4) how does the theory of joint political obligation give us a stronger reason to support the principle of charity, and is well compatible with the theory of fair play to meet the criteria? [4 / 5, how to combine the principle of charity, the theory of political obligation and the theory of common good to meet the standard, with fair game theory as the core. [3 / 6, the author tries to propose a "necessity test" to re-evaluate the standard. [1]. [3] understanding.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B82-051

【相似文献】