比较研究《蔷薇园》与《求生之路》

发布时间：2018-03-13 22:39

本文选题：蔷薇园　切入点：求生之路　出处：《新疆大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：波斯著名诗人萨迪的著作《蔷薇园》问世于1258年,该作品问世后,知名度不断提高,其手抄本反复地缮写在伊朗,土耳其,埃及,印度以及中亚一些国家。后来以这些手抄本为基础《蔷薇园》在东西方国家一次又一次地出版。因此,《蔷薇园》不仅是个波斯文学史上的一颗明亮而珍贵的宝珠,也是影响世界文学及文化的不朽之作。《蔷薇园》也是对维吾尔文学有深刻影响的经典作品之一,从14世纪到20世纪初,《蔷薇园》一直成为新疆经院学堂里的书生学波斯语的必修课程。从而得知,维吾尔古典文学史上的众多文人在自己的文学创作过程中都接触过此作品。18-19世纪著名的维吾尔古典诗人尼扎里就是深受萨迪及其作品影响的维吾尔族诗人之一。尼扎里的著作《求生之路》问世于1843年,是一部训诲体裁的文学作品。辞文本中,诗人以散文与诗歌的形式体现善与恶、慷慨与自私、善善恶恶、勤奋与懒惰、愚昧与智慧等观念。其文体与思维上的有些特点与《蔷薇园》保持一致。因此,比较研究这两部作品加深维吾尔文学研究起着重要的作用。我以比较文学的研究方法为起点,指出这两位诗人著作中的相同之处与区别,并加以分析造成这种现象的缘由。本论文分为绪论,正文,结论等三大部分,第一部分是第一章,主要对选题目的与意义,以及本题目国内外研究情况等做导入式介绍。正文是由三章构成的,主要对两位诗人的生平与文学遗产、哲学观、社会观、人道主义观、善恶观、信徒的道德与知识观等内容进行系统性挖掘。第三部分是结论。该部分总结两部作品的整体思想,分析两位诗人观点的相同于不同之处,从正文做出了概括性的结论。要提醒的是由于这两位诗人生活的时代背景和社会制度与至今不同,可能在作品中的有一部分思想今天看来,可能已经显得陈旧,不足为奇。但在13世纪与19世纪的人们来说,这些观念颇有积极的社会意义。这需要我们以唯物主义的立场来加以分辨。
[Abstract]:In 1258, the famous Persian poet Sardi's work, Rose Garden, was published. Since its publication, the work has become more and more popular, and its manuscripts have been repeatedly written in Iran, Turkey, Egypt, India and some countries in Central Asia. Based on these manuscripts, Rose Garden was published again and again in Eastern and Western countries. Therefore, Rose Garden is not only a bright and precious pearl in the history of Persian literature. It is also a monumental work that affects world literature and culture. Rose Garden is also one of the classic works that have a profound influence on Uygur literature. From 14th century to the beginning of 20th century, Rose Garden has been a compulsory course for students studying Persian language in the Xinjiang School of Classics. Many scholars in the history of Uygur classical literature have come into contact with this work in their literary creation. Nizari, a famous Uygur classical poet in the 18th and 19th century, is one of the Uighur poets deeply influenced by Saadi and his works. Nizari's book, the way to Survival, was published in 1843. It is a literary work of instruction, in which poets express good and evil in prose and poetry, generosity and selfishness, good and evil, diligence and laziness, The concepts of ignorance and wisdom. Some characteristics of their style and thinking are consistent with "Rose Garden". Therefore, comparative study of these two works plays an important role in deepening the study of Uygur literature. I take the research method of comparative literature as the starting point. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The first part is the first chapter, which is mainly about the purpose and significance of the selected topic. The text is composed of three chapters, which mainly focus on the life and literary heritage of the two poets, philosophy, society, humanitarianism, good and evil. The third part is the conclusion. This part summarizes the whole thought of the two works and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two poets. A general conclusion has been drawn from the text. It should be recalled that since the background and social system of the two poets' lives are different from those of the present day, it is possible that some of the ideas in the works today may have become obsolete. Not surprisingly. But in 13th century and 19th century, these ideas had positive social implications. This requires us to distinguish them from materialistic positions.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I106-03

【相似文献】