中国英语学习者的非宾格动词的选择性石化研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 06:49

本文选题：选择性石化 + 非宾格动词　；参考：《中国海洋大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在第二语言的学习过程中,石化是一种普遍现象,极大地制约着学习者第二语言的发展。石化理论一直是二语习得研究中的核心和热点问题,关于石化理论的争议也越演愈烈。为了避免石化理论的诸多争议,Han(2009)提出了选择性石化理论。选择性石化理论主要就影响中介语石化的两大要素,即第一语言的标记性和第二语言的输入力度,对中介语的石化作出解释和预测。鉴于学习者在二语习得过程中,英语非宾格动词被动化错误较为普遍,本文以此作为研究选择性石化的切入点。本文采用Balcom(1997)的合乎语法性判断测试,将三组不同英语水平学习者习得非宾格动词的结果,与英语为母语的人的结果进行比较。偿试探索三个实验问题：1.英语水平和非宾格动词的习得是否有联系?2.英语为第二语言的中国学习者在习得非宾格动词时,是否发生了选择性石化?3.如果发生了,是何种因素导致?根据SPSS数据处理结果,得出如下结论：随着学习者英语水平的提升,非宾格动词的习得情况也相应好转；非宾格动词的习得速度并非线性上升,而是在学习者接近中等水平前后,习得的速度先下降而后继续上升;即便是接受了至少15年英语教育的高级二语学习者,对非宾格动词的接受程度仍与母语使用者有明显差异,进而证明了非宾格动词的习得发生了选择性石化；语境中的外部事件影响学习者对非宾格动词的使用,其影响并不显著；相对于不可交替性非宾格动词而言,可交替性非宾格动词对学习者造成的困扰更大。结合理论对实验结果进一步分析,探究产生选择性石化的原因。第一语言的无标记性和第二语言的输入强度可能是导致非宾格动词选择性石化的原因之一。此外,其它因素也可导致非宾格动词的选择性石化的发生,如石化的模块性、学习者的认知因素、非宾格动词本身的及物性特征等。本文研究结果可为相关教学实践和理论研究提供的参考。
[Abstract]:In the course of second language learning, fossilization is a common phenomenon, which greatly restricts the development of the second language of the learners. The petrochemical theory has been the core and hot issue in the study of two language acquisition. The controversy over the petrochemical theory has become more and more intense. In order to avoid many disputes in the petrochemical theory, Han (2009) proposed a selective Petrochemical theory. The theory of selective fossilization mainly affects the two major elements of interlanguage fossilization, namely the Markedness of the first language and the intensity of the input of the second language, to explain and predict the fossilization of the interlanguage. In view of the fact that the learners' passive errors in the English Non object verbs are more common in the process of two language acquisition. This is used as a selective stone for the study. By using the grammatical judgment test of Balcom (1997), this paper uses three groups of English learners to acquire the results of the non - object verbs and compare the results of the English - native speakers. To try to explore three experimental questions: 1. is there a connection between the acquisition of 1. English level and the non object verb? 2. English is the second language If Chinese learners acquire non - object verbs, do they have selective fossilization? 3. if it happens, what is the result? According to the results of SPSS data processing, the following conclusions are drawn: with the improvement of the learners' English level, the acquisition of non object verbs is also better; the acquisition speed of non object verbs is and is nonlinear. When the learner is near the middle level, the speed of acquisition first descends first and then continues to rise; even if the senior two language learners who have received at least 15 years of English education, the acceptance of the non - object verbs is still significantly different from the native speakers, which proves that the acquisition of the non - object verbs has been selectively fossilized; The impact of external events on the use of non - object verbs is not significant; in relation to uninterchangeable non - object verbs, alternant unobject verbs have more trouble for learners. The input intensity of the second language may be one of the reasons for the selective fossilization of the non object verbs. In addition, other factors can also lead to the selective fossilization of the non object verbs, such as the modularity of the fossilization, the cognitive factors of the learners, the transitivity of the non object verbs themselves, etc. The results of this paper can be used in the related teaching practice. And the reference of theoretical research.

【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H319

【相似文献】